Is death penalty against our rights?
An issue that has continuously created tension in today’s society is whether the death penalty serves as a justified and valid form of punishment. Whenever the word “death penalty” comes up people from both sides start yelling out their arguments. One side says disincentive, the other side says there’s a potential of executing an innocent man; one says justice and punishment; the other side says execution is murder. Crime is a big part of society, and everyone is aware something must be done about it. Most people know the threat of crime to their lives, but the question is when it should be dealt with. In several parts of the world, the death penalty has been assigned to those who have committed a variety of crimes from the time of ancient Babylon to present- day America. The Roman Empire freely gave out the death penalty, as did the church of the middle ages. As history tells us, Capital punishment, whose definition is “the use of death as a legally sanctioned punishment,” is an acceptable and efficient way of discouraging crime. Today, the death penalty remains and effective way of punishment for murder and other horrendous crimes.
There is debate over the morals and effectiveness of such a harsh sentence. Most commonly, the people against death penalty say it is a violation of the Eighth Amendment, which says that the U.S. cannot use “cruel and unusual” punishment. Due to the fact that “punishment” is legal suffering, it must be somewhat “cruel.” As for being unusual, it is anything but, because of the long history behind the death penalty. People will steal, take advantage of others, and commit crimes as long as it is in their best interest to do so. The purpose of our entire criminal justice system is to protect the rights of life, liberty, and property for all citizens. To do this, the punishment for crime must be harsh enough to prevent potential criminals. The death penalty makes perfect sense. Here is a...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document