This critical essay will discuss the differences between social Darwinism and Darwin’s theory of evolution. Darwin was naturalist from the 1900s. He is considered the father of biology. Charles’s Darwin’s name is heavily connected to his own theory of natural selection and the manner in which the natural world progressed. This theory was later used by others in a social context resulting in the outcome of a new theory titles Social Darwinism.
Darwin was in 1809 in England. He had for older siblings. He was not considered a diligent student and therefore mistreated his education, this very much created a rift between Charle’s Darwin and his father. It was very clear from an early age that Darwin himself had a great fascination with the study of medicine which furthermore created conflict between his father and himself. It was through this that he became a part of thetravels of the Beagle. It was a ship that travelled for five years around the world. It started in 1831. He grew a great interest in coral reefs as well as South America. He studied these both in detail. He was in fact the very firt person to study and explain how these reefs formed and thought that through this is name would be remembered. Darwin’s theory of evolution was based on descent with modification. These modifications and survival for descending rely on natural selection. This means that the stronger individual will outlive those of the weaker and continue to evolve and modify, passing these stronger genes onto offspring. Natural selection is preceded by evolution.
Social Darwinism suggests the surviving existence of the fittest; it is claim that originates from Darwin’s theory of evolution based on natural selection. The idea of natural selection has been used in the law of society. The original meaning of this theory is applied in the animal kingdom. It stems from the basis of survival of the fittest, which basically means those individual who are strong will survive and therefore...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document