The problem that arises from Brazil's rainforest dilemma is that the various benefits and harms of the development of forest are incommensurable and not easily weighed. They involve the weighing of differences between global and local goods - the benefits of selling lumber and creating ranches for local populations versus the possible global benefits of a potential cure for cancer or a contribution to the reduction of greenhouse gases.
Cutting Down the Rainforest Rids the Land of All Nutrients and Makes it Infertile
The rainforest was cut down by the original pioneers and primarily the ranchers' workforces, and then burnt during the dry season. The ash from the forest was then used to fertilize the crops or fodder they developed. The constraints of the rainforest's soil are pivotal to the much concern that arose from this technique of clearing, burning, and then planting. This technique could render worthwhile crops, but only for a short time - from between 2-3 years to 10-12 years. After this, however, the landowners are compelled to move... [continues]
Cite This Essay
(2005, 04). Cutting Down the Brazilian Rainforest Is Wrong. StudyMode.com. Retrieved 04, 2005, from http://www.studymode.com/essays/Cutting-Down-Brazilian-Rainforest-Wrong-54902.html
"Cutting Down the Brazilian Rainforest Is Wrong" StudyMode.com. 04 2005. 04 2005 <http://www.studymode.com/essays/Cutting-Down-Brazilian-Rainforest-Wrong-54902.html>.
"Cutting Down the Brazilian Rainforest Is Wrong." StudyMode.com. 04, 2005. Accessed 04, 2005. http://www.studymode.com/essays/Cutting-Down-Brazilian-Rainforest-Wrong-54902.html.