Preview

Cruel and Unusual Punishment

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2195 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cruel and Unusual Punishment
Cruel Punishment

Just like defining “Law,” cruel punishment has no universally expected definition. The existing legal systems define cruel punishment in terms that best suit the applicability of their legal system as well as considering the expected morals in a particular society. The complexity surrounding definition of cruel and unusual punishment has been made possible by the elasticity of society and therefore flexibility of morals. What is moral in one society is definitely not moral in another society. However, due to the need of conformity and standardization that has been occasioned by globalization, most societies do share the same legal system and as a result they share a common definition as far as cruel and unusual punishment is concerned. This way, it becomes easier for a legal system to define cruel punishment in a way that best suits the applicability of their various laws without arising inconsistencies and repugnancies to justice as well as law and morality of a society. Therefore as discussed above, a legal system has to define cruel punishment according to the moral standards of its society. It has to take into consideration the attitude of the people living in the society into consideration when positing such definition. Additionally, they have to consider the applicability of the definition and its anticipated results. For any law to be effective it has got to be backed by sanctions, therefore a legal system has got to find ways of delivering punishment that is proportionate to the gravity of the crime committed. That way it will succeed in impeding other offenders from such acts and therefore making the society safer. This paper is going to look into the Common Law definition of cruel and unusual punishment. It will also look into the legal precedents that have been set by court cases in the USA in an attempt to define cruel and unusual punishment. Specifically it is going to discuss cruel and unusual punishment from the point of view



References: Brown v. Mayle, 283 F.3d 1019 (9th Cir. 2002) Coker v Enmund v. Florida, 458 U.S. 782, 102 S. Ct. 3368, 73 L. Ed. 2d 1140 (1982) Ford v gregg v. georgia, 428 U.S. 153, 96 S. Ct. 2909, 49 L. Ed. 2d 859 [1976] Hudson v Hope v. Pelzer, 536 U.S. 730, 122 S.Ct. 2508, 153 L. Ed. 2d 666 (2002) Jackson v Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586, 98 S. Ct. 2954, 57 L. Ed. 2d 973 [1978] Lockyer v Miller v. State, 63 So. 3d 676 (Ala. Crim. App. 2010) [2010 BL 199701] Trop v Solem v. Helm, 463 U.S. 277, 103 S. Ct. 3001, 77 L. Ed. 2d 637 (1983)

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    References: Armarcion D. Henderson v. The United States of America, 11-9307 (2011). Retrieved from thecocklebur.com Academic database .…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Tax Research Memo

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages

    | IRC § 6013 (a)IRC § 2 (b)IRC § 152 KNOCHELMANN, JR. v. COMM., (sixth circuit) Cite as 108 AFTR 2d 2011-6011, 08/30/2011 , Code Sec(s) 152; 151; 21; 24; 1; 2…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is still confusion about what is actually constitutes "cruel and unusual punishment." There have been several court cases of interest that have challenged and redefined this concept. In Louisiana ex. Rel. Francis v. Resweber, a convicted murdered was subject to a botched execution, and subsequently argued that a second attempt at execution would be a violation of the Eighth Amendment constituting cruel and unusual punishment. While the Supreme Court rejected this argument, stating that the eighth amendment applies to "cruelty inherent in the method of punishment." I found it interesting that in the Case of Trop v. Dulles the Supreme Court ruled that loss of citizenship did constitute cruel and unusual punishment. The Supreme Courts position was that to revoke citizenship would be "to subject the individual to a fate forbidden by the principles of civilized treatment guaranteed by the Eighth Amendment."…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cruel and unusual punishment is the term used to describe criminal punishment which is considered unacceptable due to the suffering or humiliation it causes on the person. Cruel and unusual punishment has a very long history and is now noted in the constitution. There are several cases that deal with the consequences of cruel and unusual punishment and the constitution also protects people from this being used on them. The government has also put restrictions on the punishment judges can give to people for committing crimes due to the history of cruel and unusual punishment.(2)…

    • 2235 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Polygraph Usage

    • 2190 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Frye v. United States, 54 App. D. C. 46, 293 F. 1013. No. 3968, (1923)…

    • 2190 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Decisions

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized (Fourth Amendment). The text of the Fourth Amendment does not define exactly what “unreasonable search” is. The framers of the constitution left the words “unreasonable search” open in order for the Supreme Court to interpret. Hence, by looking at the text of the Fourth Amendment, the words “unreasonable search” is very ambiguous and it’s the job of the Supreme Court to delineate the ambiguity of the words. In the case Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967), Katz was convicted of illegal wagering based on evidence obtained by attaching a small listening and recording device to the exterior of a public telephone booth that he regularly used for wagering calls (Kanovitz, 2010, p.268). The Supreme Court found that Katz’s Fourth Amendment right was violated by declaring,…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Florida v. Bostick was a felony drug trafficking case which set precedence to the legality of random police searches of passengers aboard public buses and trains pertaining to said passenger’s fourth amendment rights. Shortly after boarding a bus departing from Miami headed for Atlanta, Terrance Bostick was approached by members of the Broward County Sheriffs department acting as part of a drug interception task force and without particularly suspicion was questioned by officers. Broward county sheriff officers advised Mr. Bostick of his right to not consent to a search of his personal belongings and then asked his permission to carry out the search. Terrance Bostick granted sheriffs officers request by consenting to the search which revealed a felonious amount…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Probable cause and Reasonable suspicion are two legal terms used in the United States legal system, in this essay I will be comparing and contrasting the two terms as well as providing examples. Probable cause is the level of facts and evidence required to obtain a warrant for, or as an exception to the warrant requirements for, making an arrest or conducting a personal or property search, etc. when criminal charges are being considered. Courts usually find probable cause when there is a reasonable basis for believing that a crime may have been committed (for an arrest) or when evidence of the crime is present in the place to be searched (for a search). Under exigent circumstances, probable cause can also justify a warrantless search or seizure. Persons arrested without a warrant are required to be brought before a competent authority shortly after the arrest for a prompt judicial determination of probable cause. Reasonable suspicion is the legal standard by which a police officer has the right to briefly detain a suspect for investigatory purposes and frisk the outside of their clothing for weapons, but not drugs. While many factors contribute to a police officer’s level of authority in a given situation, the reasonable suspicion standard requires facts or circumstances that would lead a reasonable person to believe that a suspect has, is, or will commit a crime. While reasonable suspicion does not require hard evidence, it does require more than a hunch. A combination of particular facts, even if each is individually insignificant, can form the basis of reasonable suspicion. For example, police may have reasonable suspicion to detain someone who fits a description of a criminal suspect, a suspect who drops a suspicious object after seeing police, or a suspect in a high crime area who runs after seeing police. Probable cause and reasonable suspicion are both governed by the 4th amendment which states “The right of the people to be secure in their persons,…

    • 772 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    search and seizure

    • 1684 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Legal Information Institute, Cornell University Law School (n.d). Retrieved on January 14, 2014 from http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/437/385…

    • 1684 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gun Free School Zone

    • 1807 Words
    • 8 Pages

    References: Cornell University Law School, United States v. Lopez (93-1260), 514 U.S. 549 (1995) Retrieved from http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/93-1260.ZO.html on March 28, 2010.…

    • 1807 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to determine whether the death penalty is to be considered cruel and unusual punishment, it is necessary to first define each word in order to get full understanding of the issue being assessed. According to the Merriam-Webster collegiate dictionary, cruel is defined as: "disposed to inflict pain or suffering devoid of humane feelings." Unusual is defined as: "not usual, uncommon, or rare." Punishment is defined as: "suffering pain or loss that serves as retribution." Should capital punishment be viewed as retribution used to cause pain or suffering without humane feelings, and is it uncommon?The message that is sent out by killing a murderer is ‘If you kill, we kill.' Punishment by death is the ultimate punishment and one that cannot…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There is no concept so central to philosophy than Reason. It is reason that is the very focal point of all discovery and knowledge, for a philosopher to achieve any kind of enlightenment without the use of reason is impossible. Reason is, arguably, that which separates man from beast, that consciousness and ability to analyze and comprehend. It has been through reason that societies and governments have been created: our own through the reasoning of our founders utilizing the reasoning of John Locke and other liberal thinkers of the "Enlightened" period.…

    • 4175 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Civil Law V. Criminal Law

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Bibliography: Barry K. Brown v. Richard Kay. (n.d.). Retrieved March 3, 2012, from Find A Case: http://ks.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.20120209_0000131.sny.htm/qx…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “He who imitates must have a care that what he writes be similar, not identical”- Petrach, Le familiari, XXIII (14thc)…

    • 2030 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    shame

    • 895 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Several international organizations have commented on various methods of execution, condoning them or calling for more humane treatment where the death penalty is used. The Safeguards Guaranteeing Protection of the Rights of Those Facing the Death Penalty provides that “where capital punishment occurs, it shall be carried out so as to inflict the minimum possible suffering.” Moreover, in its General Comment 20, the Committee recognized that when the death penalty is imposed, it must be carried out in a manner to cause “the least possible physical and mental suffering.” Nonetheless, human rights bodies have generally avoided deciding whether specific methods of execution constitute cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment. One exception is the Human Rights Committee, which held in Ng v. Canada, Communication No. 469/1991, para. 16.4, that execution by gas asphyxiation amounted to cruel and inhuman treatment. The United Nations Human Rights Commission also noted that execution by stoning was a “particularly cruel or inhuman means of execution” (Resolution 2005/29: The Question of the Death Penalty, para. 7(i)).…

    • 895 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays