Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Critical Analysis Summary on Ny Times Article "Gay Marriage: a Milestone"

Satisfactory Essays
375 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Critical Analysis Summary on Ny Times Article "Gay Marriage: a Milestone"
“Gay Marriage: A Milestone”, is an article published by the New York Times on June 26, 2011. The author of this article is not stated. This article covers the law that was passed in New York to allow the marriage of two same-sex individuals. Though this is a significant stepping stone, the federal government still does not recognize same-sex marriage; and all other states that have not passed this law, have the right to refuse the recognition of another state’s unions. The author of this article displays some strength but more weaknesses in the writing of this article on gay marriage.
The author respectfully presents both sides of the story. First, they state how same-sex marriage is now legal in New York. Then the author acknowledges there are still opposing conditions that the new law has no rights over; such as the right for certain entities to refuse a wedding or wedding party for same-sex couples. The author shows a tone in which he is for gay marriage. This is evident in his negative tone towards everything that is still wrong with the laws and rights for same-sex marriage. I believe the tone the author uses is a strength considering they are for same-sex marriage.
In this article, the author uses minimal facts, and no quotes or expert opinion to support his writing. The organization of this article is poor, in my opinion. One example of this is how the author went off topic in the second to last paragraph of the article. The author states other laws and bills that were passed during the legislative session. Other than how the author implies that the marriage equality law was the most important of the legislative session, I do not see benefit to bringing this into the article.
Overall, the article was informative and easy to read. The author did an exceptional job at stating what is still wrong with the gay marriage laws. But failed to write much about the positives and how gay marriage is “A Milestone”. I would say the article holds strong effectiveness for the average reader. But for someone who is critically reading the article, it could have been written with more depth.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Marriage and Individuals

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Both authors have some similar perspectives on the same sex marriage topic; one of them being sociological views and the matter of same-sex couples. In addition, both Evan and Andrew believe that family and friends who support and understand gay couples have a major positive on same sex marriage. Both authors discussed that many gay or lesbian children are being raised in a non-gay environment and that has a negative impact on the lives of children. The differences between Wolfson and Sullivan’s viewpoints are that Sullivan emphasizes the individual citizen, and Wolfson emphasize the importance of same-sex marriage. Some people are still ignoring the fact that our society is changing and evolving rapidly. Same-sex couples have been suppressing their voices throughout many decades, and now they are ready to fight for their freedom and the right to be married.…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most controversial topics of today’s matter is whether gay marriage should be legalized or not. There are numerous reactions when this subject comes to discussion and can sometimes lead to a heated debate. Some individuals believe that homosexuality is unethical while people who agree with gay marriage believe to put in consideration that the sexual preference of another human being is necessary. With every conflict comes pros and cons and this topic is like pulling a tight-rope if ever brought up in a debate because you never know who will pull the rope tighter. Gay marriage has a vast influence on the society today, relevant to it becoming legalized, it is bound to impact future generations, and will affect the establishment of marriage later in life.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Article Rebuttal

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The article I decided to do is from the New York Daily News. It is on the topic of Gay Marriage and its title is “Five arguments against gay marriage: Society must brace for corrosive change.” In this article there are different areas of concern that the author talks about. One is religious freedom. The Author Wrote “A recent Newsday editorial said opponents “will be seen by future generations in much the same light as those who opposed school desegregation. Devout Catholics, Orthodox Jews and, ironically, the 70% of African-Americans who oppose gay marriage will become the new Ku Klux Klan?” (Forman, 2011) I disagree with this, there is no such thing as traditional marriage. Given the prevalence of modern and ancient examples of family arrangements based on polygamy, communal child-rearing, the use of concubines and mistresses and the commonality of prostitution, heterosexual monogamy can be considered "unnatural” in evolutionary terms. (Pro & Con Arguments: "Should gay marriage be legal?" 2011) The second argument is the Rights of Children. In the article the author says “More children living in gay homes means more children living lives absent a relationship with at least one biological parent. This will result in some emotional pain and confusion”. A study published in Pediatrics on June 7, 2010 found that children of lesbian mothers were rated higher than children of heterosexual parents in social and academic competence and had fewer social problems. And a July 2010 study found that children of gay fathers were "as well-adjusted as those adopted by heterosexual parents.” (Pro & Con Arguments: "Should gay marriage be legal?" 2011).The third argument concerns traditional marriage. “Eliminating the complementarily of the sexes in marriage changes its essence. It may be old-fashioned to believe women are still necessary to domesticate sexually predatory men. But…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Please read “A Gay Man’s Case Against Gay Marriage” by Michael Bronski on pages 687–690 of your text. Then reply with your analysis of the rhetorical situation of the essay. What is Bronski’s reason for writing? What is his purpose and angle? Who do you think his audience might be? Finally, think about the writing strategies Bronski uses to achieve his overall purpose. Based on our discussions of commentary and argumentative writing, what strategies do you think he relies upon to present his position?…

    • 179 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Who is to say who we can and cannot marry? The main issue is that homosexuals cannot explore the chance of marrying the one the love, while heterosexuals can marry freely. This action of not being allowed to being married is an act of being inferior than others, and dehumanizing. Sullivan and Bennett aren’t the only ones with beliefs on gay marriage; there will always be an opinion of gay marriage. Now that gay marriage is a possibility across America, people have become more open minded, time is changing. Who knows maybe gay marriage will be accepted as straight…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cited: Eskridge, William W Jr. and Darren R Spedale. Gay Marriage: For Better or For Worse. New…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Judging by the title of this article written by Lisa Miller, readers would tend to believe that this would be a piece of work written to support the religious side of the war on gay marriage. However, when reading through just the first paragraph, it becomes apparent that the essay is actually contributing to the discrimination of the Bible. This instantly detracts from the author’s argument because this places a biased predecessor on the information to come. The author places emphasis on the fact that there is no reason why gay marriage should be illegal. Proving her essay to be void of valuable information, this author did not effectively and correctly present the facts on…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gay Marriage

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages

    permitting gays and lesbians to marry threatens the institution of marriage?” This concludes that Katha Pollitt obviously has the mind-set that same-sex marriage is acceptable and should be allowed and, clearly, she does not see a problem with it. Same-sex marriage is something that many people have a strong opinion about. Personally, I find some of her arguments very persuasive, but given that the issue is very complex, it's hard to express one's point of view in a short…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    William Bennett

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The article by William Bennett, “Leave Marriage Alone,” is about how marriage is a sacred tradition. He believes that if you broaden the definition to include gays, that act will totally alter the purpose and meaning of marriage. Bennett also discusses whether or not allowing gays to marry will open the door for more radical ideas, such as polygamy or incest.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Doug Mainwaring’s September 21 editorial for the Washington Post, entitled “Why I oppose Gay Marriage” is a gay marriage opinion piece unlike many others. Mainwaring opens his piece explaining how a past Maryland petition opposing gay marriage has recently been brought back into the spotlight. The names of the people who had signed said petition were released, much to the shock of the general public, who were in awe to see the names of friends, neighbors, and family members in opposition of gay marriage. Mainwaring goes on to argue that because “Only a little more than 53%” of the signers were Republican, and the rest an assortment of parties, gay marriage is a “common, mainstream concern”, to be shared among citizens of all backgrounds.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case for gay Marriagw

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I chose the article THE CASE FOR GAY MARRIAGE written by Michael Nava and Robert Dawidoff. I chose this article to compare because I have similar views of that of the said authors. Since the assignment is not, however; for us to express our views on the topic, I will try my best not to be persuasive in writing.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The legal battle in the fight of gay rights tests the application of the fourteenth amendment’s equal protection clause that states “No state shall …deny any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws (CITE). Our country was founded on the principle that all people should be treated equally. Everyone should be guaranteed the same freedoms and rights no matter what gender, ethnicity or sexual orientation. One group that has historically and continuously been discriminated against is homosexuals. Author Jeff Jordan in his article “Is it Wrong to Discriminate on the Basis of Homosexuality?” defends the claim that there are situations in which it is morally permissible to discriminate against homosexuals. He contends that there is a public dilemma concerning the moral status of homosexuality and, unless a human right is at stake, then the government should refrain from favoring by publicly recognizing same-sex marriage. Jordan was unsuccessful in supporting his thesis; his argument was illogical because it lacks both clarity and empirical evidence. In another article called “Same-Sex Marriage and the Argument from Public Disagreement”, author David Boonin argues directly against Jordan’s argument, challenging the effectiveness of the claims made. While I do believe same-sex marriage should be sanctioned, Boonin’s argument did not convince me more or less on his argument, it too was unsuccessful.…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study Sociology

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This case study focuses on the gay marriages in different states. In Massachusetts the State Supreme court had a ruling that the state constitution did not agree with same-sex marriages. The only way they could grant licenses was if the legislative acted to give same-sex marriages. After this ruling in Massachusetts; in San Francisco, California the mayor ruled that they could not deny same-sex marriages. Many same-sex couples began to apply for marriage licenses and got the marriage license. The gay marriages started to attract the media and many television cameras. Soon after the California State Supreme Court said that the San Francisco mayor had exceeded his power and they told the city to stop issuing these state marriage licenses to gay couples. Courts in other states followed the Massachusetts ruling not allowing same-sex marriages. It then began to report that other foreign countries were allowing same-sex marriages to become legal. This started controversy in the United States because people in America think of marriage in a very sensitive way and that commitment it between two people who love each other. Advocates of gay marriage wanted to know why when two people are in love that they couldn’t be married. This began to raise issues for gay marriage not being legalized. Advocates were speaking out that it not only is about the commitment between the two people but also about the legal rights that the couples would obtain. The gay couples wanted the rights that a couple of a married man and women would get. They wanted to be able to get the medical rights and property rights of other normal married couples. Advocates also argued that they have their freedom also and they have the right to be in love with whomever they choose to be in love with. They just wanted the same equality as everyone else. In others terms they stated that same-sex marriage was…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Murray Lipp’s article, “7 Ways the U.S.A. Benefits From the Legalization of Gay Marriage,” he argues that same-sex marriage has many benefits despite majority thought. Lipp argues points that show how the legalization of same-sex marriage benefits America, from individual well-being to boosting of the economy. Contrary to more popular belief, he argues that there are lots of benefits to the legalization and that every state should be moved to fight for the power it brings to the people and America as a nation. On top of Lipp’s profoundly valid arguments and coverage of the spectrum of benefits, from the most immense to small-scale, he uses ethos, pathos and evidence effectively to move his readers and capture an audience from both sides of the issue.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "By recognizing and extending the definition of marriage to reflect today's greater openness towards, and recognition of, same-sex relationships, the legislation does not weaken the institution of marriage. On the contrary, it takes it forward, it strengthens it. It helps to perpetuate it," she said.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics