Preview

Criminal Law 4th November 2014

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
256 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Criminal Law 4th November 2014
Criminal Law – 4th November 2014

Diminished Responsibility

Genealogy of Diminished responsibility

Ireland Infanticide Act 1949

AG v O shea . Jury wanted to add rider to verdict. Rejected by court at time.

Doyle v Wicklow CC 1974. Person doesn’t have will power to say no. Not accepted in England but accepted in Ireland.

DPP v Joseph o mahony. 1985 . Argument denied by court.

Henchy Committee 1978- recommendation.

Criminal law (insanity) act 2006. Not guilty by insanity but their sentence is substantially diminished.

Consequences of DR verdict.

Anything from a fine to life. Should generally be shorted than life.

Mental Health (criminal law ) review board. Doesn’t mean they have to have it on the time of the trial. Just when the crime was commited.

DPP v Leigh Crowe 2009- applicant shouldn’t be treated as a person fully responsible. Should be something short of a life sentence. Was reduced to 20 years.

Important Cases- important outcomes.

DPP v O’Dwyer 2007- depersonalization disorder. Weak. He didn’t feel connected to his actions and thoughts. He was given a light sentence. 6 year sentence. More serious the mental disorder does not have a huge impact on their sentence.

DPP v Crowe 2009- shot victim at party. Post traumatic Stress Disorder. Not considered in court. 20 year sentence.

DPP v Egan. 2009- D beat to death cellmate in Mountjoy. Very serious disorder and not given his medication. He killed his cellmate. He was life sentence. No ‘short of’ in this instance.

DPP v Burke 2010 – Killed husband. Severe drinking problem and depression. Given 5 year sentence very light.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Legt 1710 Assignment 1

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The hearing of this case was held in the Court of Appeal of the New South Wales Supreme Court.…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    HISTORY: At bench trial the District Court ruled for defendant, finding as a matter of law that…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The history of the case (Who won at trial court? Who won at the lower appellate level? Who won in this decision?)…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 2011 Lafler V. Cooper was a case where Cooper was being charged with assault with intent to murder and three other offenses for shooting a woman in the thigh and buttocks after missing a shot in her head. In criminal court they offered to dismiss two of the charges and to recommend a 51-85 month sentence on the other two in exchange for a guilty plea. After entering the guilty plea, he then rejected the offer after his lawyer told him that the prosecution would be unable to establish intent to murder because the victim had been shot below the waist. Criminal…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    R Vs Robert

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Roberts was “convicted by Keenen J., sitting without a jury, of aggravated assault and possession of a weapon for a dangerous purpose.” (R v. Roberts, p 5) The sentence was postponed, however, from 2001 to 2004, because of a pending application submitted by the Crown. The application was to submit Roberts to psychiatric testing to determine if he would be convicted as a dangerous offender under section 753 of the Criminal Code or a long-term offender under section 753.1 of the Criminal Code. The application was approved and the assessment of Roberts proceeded. The sentencing judge, LaForme J., found that Roberts never fit the criteria to be a dangerous or long-term offender as described in the Criminal Code and he found that Roberts would not be sentenced as such. Roberts was sentenced to “two years less a day plus three years probation on terms requiring submission to psychiatric treatment, medication treatment, drug and alcohol treatment, plus testing and other rehabilitative conditions.” (R v. Roberts, p…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    He had another evaluation, being court ordered before his trial. The evaluation was at the Center…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Legal Prep Course

    • 4449 Words
    • 21 Pages

    his conviction of attempted murder and two of his convictions of confinement as Class B…

    • 4449 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paralegal Studies

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The next case I reviewed was Walker verses State. A hit a run took place where a witness gave a description of a vehicle and the direction the vehicle had been heading. Two officers, driving separately, went in the direction and found the car. Walker, the car owner, started to the door. As the screen door began to shut, Officer Hoffman, race to open the door. Between the tugging of the two men the door flexed causing the window to break. The evidence proved the case showed violent resistance against Walker, as recorded in Spangler v. State (1993). The State succeeded in a conviction of a Class D felony, but the Class A misdemeanor was ruled insufficient by means of Double Jeopardy. They cannot use the same evidence to convict Walker twice as a result of Richardson v. State, 717 N.E.2d 32, 49 (Ind. 1999)[->0] "No person shall be put in jeopardy twice for the same offense." Two or more offenses are the same offense for double jeopardy purposes if, "with respect to either the statutory…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Criminal Law Paper

    • 1806 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The case of Miller v. Alabama (2012) is the result of Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals case No. 10-9646, which involves a 14-year-old named Evan Miller who was convicted of aggravated murder, and sentenced by the Alabama state court to a mandatory term of life in prison without parole. Miller and a friend assaulted Miller 's neighbor, and set fire to his home after spending the evening drinking alcohol and using drugs. As a result of his actions, the neighbor died. Miller was originally charged as an adult; however, his case was removed to adult court, and he was charged with murder and arson. During the trial, the jury found Miller guilty of the crime, and he was sentenced to a punishment of life without parole as statutorily mandated (Supreme Court of the United States, 2011).…

    • 1806 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Legal

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages

    HEARING DATE {S): 19 February 2002 to 22 February 2002, 25 February 2002 to 28 February 2002 & 12 April 2002.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Insanity Defense

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It has called for a new definition of the word “insanity” and has caused many new standards to be put in place. A new standard, for example, is the competency test. All jurisdictions require that criminals must be competent to stand trial, meaning that the accused knows the nature of their actions and understand that what they did was wrong, if they cannot do that they will be found to be mentally incompetent to stand the trial (FindLaw). This, however, does not mean that the person is immediately found not guilty or innocent. The person will receive treatment until they are competent enough to stand trial. The insanity defense also called for a reform act in 1984, stating that the defendant must be unable to understand the “nature and quality of the wrongfulness of his acts” (FindLaw). It also states that a mental disease does not constitute as an argument. Lastly, the insanity defense has called for a test that decides if the criminal is mentally ill, however, guilty. The guilty but mentally ill verdict allows criminals who are mentally ill to be found liable for their actions and receive treatment while in jail or be sent to a mental hospital. Once they are seen to be well enough, they will be sent to prison to serve their…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Emtala

    • 3841 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Bitterman, R. A., & Fish, M. B. (2009). Sixth circuit: Admission to the hospital does not…

    • 3841 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Chatterton v. Gearson (1981) 3 WLR 1003. Document No: C11260, From LawtelDatabaseDepartment of Health and Welsh Office (1994) Code of Practice; Mental Health Act (1983). London. HSMO.…

    • 3773 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    [ 14 ]. Abebe v Commonwealth (1999) 197 CLR 510, 531 [41] by Gleeson CJ & Mchugh J.…

    • 4001 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Court Report

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Australian judicial system comprises of different levels of court which hear criminal and civil matters in order to protect and promote human rights through a transparent and efficient justice system and by upholding the rule of law(cite) . The aforementioned notion was challenged upon observations made during visits to the Downing Centres' Magistrate and district court and the Supreme court of NSW. This paper will provide a reflective discussion analysing my experience and observations of court proceedings…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays