Within the article Raskolnikov analyzes the psychology of a criminal before and after the crime. This main portion of the article is not discussed, but it is likely that the psychological explanation that Porfiry gives Raskolnikov later, in the examination, is very similar. During this later examination, Raskolnikov appears resentful, but never disputes what Porfiry tells him, perhaps because it is a regurgitation of Raskolnikov's own thoughts. In the last meeting of the two men, Porfiry admits that he liked the article very much, and actually felt a connection with it. The one part of the main body of the article that is mentioned is "that the perpetration of a crime is always accompanied by illness" (225). Porfiry comments that this idea is very original; Raskolnikov welcomes this praise.
Shortly, Porfiry moves on to the main topic of their discussion, a topic only mentioned briefly in the article, the idea that "certain persons...have a perfect right to commit breaches of morality and crimes" (225). Raskolnikov immediately realizes that Porfiry is intentionally exaggerating the idea, and "decided to take up the challenge" (226). Dostoevsky lets the reader know... [continues]
Cite This Essay
(2013, 05). Crime and Punishment. StudyMode.com. Retrieved 05, 2013, from http://www.studymode.com/essays/Crime-And-Punishment-1676999.html
"Crime and Punishment" StudyMode.com. 05 2013. 2013. 05 2013 <http://www.studymode.com/essays/Crime-And-Punishment-1676999.html>.
- MLA 7
"Crime and Punishment." StudyMode.com. StudyMode.com, 05 2013. Web. 05 2013. <http://www.studymode.com/essays/Crime-And-Punishment-1676999.html>.
"Crime and Punishment." StudyMode.com. 05, 2013. Accessed 05, 2013. http://www.studymode.com/essays/Crime-And-Punishment-1676999.html.