Preview

Crazy Computers

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
454 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Crazy Computers
Crazy Computers Case The question at matter is if CIC reinsures extended warranty contracts with TPI sold by CC, is it appropriate for CC to recognize commission revenue at the time of sale of the extended warranty contracts? I believe you really have to determine who the true obligator is, whether it is still the third party insurer or if it would now be Crazy Computers because of having a wholly owned subsidiary that is reinsuring warranties sold by Crazy Computers. Since customers have the option to buy the warranty from Crazy Computers (CC) and there is an obligation that CIC, the wholly owned subsidiary of CC, could reinsure the extended warranty risk of the third party transaction then I believe that CC is the primary obligor. Now as for how the recognition is handled, ASC 605 talks about accounting for warranties. It states that “sellers of extended warranty or product maintenance contract have an obligation to the buyer to perform services throughout the period of the contract.” Basically this means that revenue should be recognized proportionately over the length of the warranty obligation. In my opinion Crazy Computers is the primary obligor and because of this the recognition of revenue should be deferred and recognized appropriately over the period of obligation.

SolvGen Inc. This case discusses the company Direct Drugs Inc. and their plans to acquire SolvGen Inc. SolvGen Inc. has two material agreements with Careway Pharma Inc. One of the case requirements asks what the deliverables for the arrangement described in the case study were. These being the research and development agreement and a license and distribution agreement. The next requirement asked when the milestone payments received to date by SolvGen were to be recognized as revenue. The nonrefundable milestones include an exclusive negotiation payment of $1 million dollars paid on December 1, 2009, contract signing payment of $2 million paid on January 1, 2010, a commercial

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. Equipment with an estimated market value of $55,000 is offered for sale at $75,000. The equipment is acquired for $20,000 in cash and a note payable of $40,000 due in 30 days. The amount used in the buyer's accounting records to record this acquisition is…

    • 1966 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pharmagen Case Summary

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In this situation I would argue that ASC 730-20 is applicable. Pharmagen is entering into an agreement with PEI (investors) on a contractual basis to provide services and an option to acquire the results of the R&D (FASB 68). Pharmagen retains all ownership rights to the development of X. It also states that in R&D arrangements the entity (in this case Pharmagen) usually has an option to either purchase the partnership’s interest (PEI) or to obtain the exclusive rights to the entire results in return for a lump sum payment or royalty payments to the partnership (in this case PEI). This clearly fits into Pharmagen’s case since PEI is entitled to receive future royalties from Pharmagen in return for contributions (funds) for the development of X.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Trueblood Case 09 2

    • 804 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Issue: Decide how to account for the funding of the R&D and royalty payments. Identify the authoritative literature applicable to this funding arrangement and discuss the appropriate accounting for the agreement in accordance with that guidance.…

    • 804 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the key issues in this case is what are considered deliverables in the arrangement made between…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    case two acc301

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages

    FASB ASC 605-20-25 addresses how revenue and costs from a separately priced extended warranty or product maintenance contract should be recognized.…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pharmagen

    • 508 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. The funding can be seen as a package deal for both X and Y and is said to be for sale of royalty rights of Y and also for future R&D for X. Royalties of Y can be seen as an incentive. Royalties for Y might be expected to receive royalties and conditions are probable because Y is commercialized already as per ASC 730-20-25-5. This is separate from R&D of product X. The entity “essentially completed the project before entering into the arrangement.” (ASC 730-20-25-6). Funding, when it comes to Y, can be seen as an interest in future revenue. It will be a deferred income for the entity and will be capitalized and proportionally used for the defined period.(ASC 470-10-25-1&2) as royalties are paid to the investor. Incremental funding is determined by the progress of product X and that progress is not measured in the case. It could be by development stage, increased marketability,…

    • 508 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ACC 291 Final Exam

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages

    6. S. Lawyer performed legal services for E. Corp. Due to a cash shortage, an agreement was reached whereby E. Corp. would pay S. Lawyer a legal fee of approximately $15,000 by issuing 8,000 shares of its common stock (par $1). The stock trades on a daily basis and the market price of the stock on the day the debt was settled is $1.80 per share. Given this information, the best journal entry for E. Corp. to record for this transaction is…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Besson Freight Company had an agreement with Jay Transportation to purchase their assets for 225 million. In order to finance their purchase, Besson asked a shareholder in Besson, Deltona Lines, to invest 110 million. Deltona agrees with the stipulation that the investment be made into a newly formed subsidiary named Del-Bess Inc. Deltona will own 80 percent of Del-Bess voting preferred stock. Also in Deltona’s agreement, Besson would contribute an amount to be determined by Del-Bess for the remaining 20 percent of the voting preferred stock and all non-voting common stock. Then Del-Bess would be the entity to purchase the assets from Jay Transportation and lease them to Besson Freight Company. The remaining 60 million necessary to fund the purchase would be provided by bank financing.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The complaint alleged that the business plan of Covis enterprise was that it would try to sell itself or its assets soon after developing a market in the pharmaceuticals that it acquired. Based on that description, merger discussions and negotiations were to be expected by Plaintiffs. Therefore, the pendency of merger negotiations thus signaled no more than the Covis enterprise’s continued adherence to its announced corporate…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    FHC entered a written employee contract to provide certain benefits to Winkel. During the period of the contractual agreement, both parties entered into a modified oral agreement of the written contract. The agreement was that FHC would pay a higher salary and give a profit – share bonus. FHC gave Winkel the increase in salary a year later, but did not give in the profit-share.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cash Flows Case

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The agreement includes certain covenants and provides for various events of termination. The agreement also requires that proceeds from securitization be used to pay down Company debt. During the current year, $11 million of receivables generated from sales of the Company’s inventory were sold under the agreement, and, therefore, are not reflected in the accounts receivable balance in the Company’s balance sheet. 3. Acquisition of Property, Plant, and Equipment on…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case 12 04

    • 1915 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Case 12-04 Hemo-Tech Inc. Part I Hemo-Tech Inc. (“Hemo”) manufactures and sells specialized medical equipment and services to physicians and hospitals. The equipment is used to extract and store blood samples from patients. Hemo is currently marketing its latest equipment model, BIO-07, which includes Hemo’s new patented technology that significantly improves sample collection efficiency and reduces contamination risk to a low level. Hemo is the only company in the United States that sells this type of equipment with the next-generation technology. Hemo’s domestic competitors sell equipment that is largely the same as Hemo’s older equipment model, BIO-02. Hemo entered into a contractual arrangement with Extract Co. (“Extract”). Extract operates several hospitals in Region X. Below is a term sheet that summarizes the arrangement, which also includes various excerpts from the sales agreement.…

    • 1915 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    computers

    • 1169 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Summarize the case study, being sure to describe the underlying problem(s) of the collapse of the system…

    • 1169 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. How should the company recognize revenue based upon the two possible FOB contract structures mentioned in the case? Explain.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    On November 29, 1947, the plaintiff entered on a written agreement, Exhibit A, with the defendant, the most important provisions of which are (1) that they shall organize a partnership for the bottling and distribution of Mision soft drinks, plaintiff to act as industrial partner or manager, and the defendant as a capitalist, furnishing the capital necessary therefor; (2) that the defendant was to decide matters of general policy regarding the business, while the plaintiff was to attend to the operation and development of the bottling plant; (3) that the plaintiff was to secure the Mission Soft Drinks franchise for and in behalf of the proposed partnership; and (4) that the plaintiff was to receive 30 per cent of the net profits of the business. The above agreement was arrived at after various conferences and consultations by and between them, with the assistance of their respective attorneys. Prior to entering into this agreement, plaintiff had informed the Mission Dry Corporation of Los Angeles, California, U.S.A., manufacturers of the bases and ingridients of the beverages bearing its name, that he had interested a prominent financier (defendant herein) in the business, who was willing to invest half a million dollars in the bottling and distribution of the said beverages, and requested, in order that he may close the deal with him, that the right to bottle and distribute be granted him for a limited time under the condition that it will finally be transferred to the corporation (Exhibit H). Pursuant for this request, plaintiff was given "a thirty-days" option on exclusive bottling and distribution rights for the Philippines" (Exhibit…

    • 9969 Words
    • 40 Pages
    Powerful Essays