Preview

Courtroom Work Groups

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
384 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Courtroom Work Groups
| Courtroom Work Groups | Jaraka Ward | | University of Phoenix | 10/21/2012 |

|

I found several responses to the question of who is included in the courtroom work group. I believe that the criminal prosecutor, defense attorney, and a judicial officer make up the most common courtroom work group. The daily interaction of this group is to make sure that rules are being followed in each individual group but also to make sure it is given in a timely manner. The courtroom work group needs to communicate in order to offer plea bargains and choose jurors. The role of the prosecutor is to protect the government or community’s best interests. This being said the prosecutor must take cases based on the facts of each case and the evidence provided. If the prosecutor did not do this and took every case under less stringent requirements it could leave many cases going to trial with a lack of evidence and lead to a waste of court room time and money for attempting a trial with no evidence to convince a jury. This could also lead to innocent people being convicted on no evidence simply because of a well-spoken lawyer. This being said, if the prosecutors were more stringent about the cases they took and the minimum amount of evidence was greater it may lead to criminals getting away with more crimes and never being brought to trial because of a lack of concrete evidence. The only way I see that the courtroom work group could be improved would be if all parties focused more on the justice and rules side rather than always focusing on the speedy aspect of getting things done. There will always be the criminals let go because of a lack of evidence to convince a jury as well as innocent people who will be convicted without proper concrete evidence, this is why I am a strong believer in the appeal system. I do however feel that these numbers could be reduced if we could slow the system down while still maintaining due process and a speedy trial.



References: Criminal Justice Today: An Introductory Text for the 21st Century, Eleventh Edition, by Frank Schmalleger (2012, 08). Courtroom Workgroups. StudyMode.com. Retrieved 08, 2012, from http://www.studymode.com/essays/Courtroom-Workgroups-1070144.html

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The prosecutor has a very important role as a member of the courtroom workgroup. The prosecutor may also be known as the district attorney, states attorney, or the commonwealth attorney (Schmalleger, 2011). The prosecutor is responsible for making and presenting the case of the state against the accused. In their own way the prosecutor speaks on behalf of the people, for the law or laws broken by the defendant. The…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    trail of ghenus khan

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In this simulation, I liked that we all worked together as a group, and we each had an important part in the trial. When we work as a group, the work seemed to go faster. For instance, my partner and I were both defensive attorney’s, and when it came to looking for questions…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Courtroom Chart

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages

    | |matters; they don't work with civil cases such as |citizens. This makes the prosecutor's duties somewhat |…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    References: Schmalleger, F. (2011). Criminal Justice Today: An introductory text for the twenty-first century (11th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ. Pearson Prentice Hall…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A. Lawyers who work within the parameters of the courtroom work group receive benefits for their clients, including more case information from prosecutors and perhaps better plea bargains. Lawyers who are less cooperative find that they do not get favorable case-scheduling considerations and get less favorable plea bargains.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Criminal Justice Today: An Introductory Text for the 21st Century, Eleventh Edition, by Frank Schmalleger. Published by Prentice Hall.…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Juvenile Justice System

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Schmalleger, F. (2011). Criminal Justice Today. An Introductory Text for the 21st Century (11th ed.). Retrieved from https://ecampus.phoenix.edu/content/eBookLibrary2/content/eReader.aspx…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Truth in Sentencing

    • 1903 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Schmalleger, F. (2012). Criminal Justice Today: An Introductory Text for the 21st Century, 11th ed. Upper Saddle River: NJ.…

    • 1903 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Courtroom Workgroup

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The courtroom workgroup is a mechanism for prosecutorial discretion. Various techniques are used to convince the defendant that the evidence against him or her is overwhelming. “Charge stacking” is a process by which police and prosecutors create case with numerous charges or numerous instances of the same charge to convince the defendant that the risk of not pleading guilty is intolerable. The defendant may be convinced to plead guilty to a few of the charges in return for not being prosecuted for the remaining charges. Because the courtroom workgroup deviates from the public consensus of how justice works, it has developed a deviant set of virtues to continue its work and facilitate daily life for its participants. ("Courtroom Workgroup", n.d.) This group interacts daily to make sure that rules are being followed in each individual group but also to make sure it is given in a timely manner. The courtroom work group needs to communicate in order to offer plea bargains and choose jurors. The role of the prosecutor is to protect the government or community’s best interests. With that being said, the prosecutor must take cases based on the facts of each case and the evidence provided. If the prosecutor did not do this and took every case under less stringent requirements it could leave many cases going to trial with a…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The judicial branch is responsible for overseeing the local, state, and federal court systems. It explains the meaning of the Constitution and laws passed by the legislative branch and enforced by the executive branch. Now the Supreme Court is ahead of the judicial branch because it is the highest court of the land. The Supreme Court rules if whether or not the issue itself is constitutional. (Dictionary, 2013)…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The courtroom workgroup is made up of people in the criminal justice system such as judges and prosecutors. They decide what happens in every case that is presented in the system and use their discretion on whether to deny or accept a case. The way that cases are identified as serious depends on the evidence that is available. Other factors such as witnesses, prior record, and criminal activity is all taken into account. If the courtroom workgroup decides that there isn’t enough information for the case to go on they drop it because they see no use in wasting their time with it. Walker mentions that most of the cases like rape are what get dropped because of insufficient evidence and people tend to see it as the offender getting off the hook (2015, p. 66). It may be seen as an injustice because those cases don’t go through to have a trial, but too much work is put into cases that the best option is to just put all the effort in the ones that will get a conviction. Those other cases that are seen as more serious because of prior record and the type of crime committed usually have a high going rate. Some crimes like murder are known to have higher going rate because of how…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    With that comes a lot of room for corruption to occur. Also with pressure being put on the public defender and prosecutors because of limited jail space it is hard for justice to be served. I believe that some stronger controls should be entered into the plea bargaining system. The plea bargaining system should be monitored more closely to watch for corruption in the system. Also to help the prosecutor and public defender to serve justice a little better there would need to be more holding facilities so that more criminals that deserved it would end up in…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What if you Were Boss

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The judicial courts is one of the most difficult undertaking out of all the judicial system. Even though law enforcement officers apprehend offenders, it is still up to the prosecutors to retrieve and analyze all evidence from the scene of the crime that the officers collected, so that they can compile a case against the defendant. Then there is the defense also gathering information to make a case to prove the defendant is innocent. Now if I was the boss for the day I would make some changes to help make both sides more successful.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Since their creation in the 1990’s, problem-solving courts have become of much interest to the legal community. Not only are these courts revolutionary in their way of processing cases, but also they are proving to have great success rates. One of the most important aspects of the problem-solving courts is how much more involved a judge is with each case. In traditional courts, a judge will most likely read off the names of the people in the docket, and simply sentence an individual according to what the DA has already negotiated. During a problem-solving court, the judge has the opportunity to get to know each defendant on a more personal level, and be able to help the defendant succeed. While results have shown that the more involved judges are, the more likely it is for a program to succeed, there is much criticism regarding the judge’s attachment to each…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In United States Criminal Justice System, all criminal cases need the Participation of the judge, counsel for the prosecution, and the counsel for the accused. Criminal justice system is incomplete with either of them not being present. Prosecutors value their power to seek justice for an accused person but sometimes they use it dishonestly. Prosecutors have so much power that they sometimes take advantage of and engage in misconduct.…

    • 201 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays