Preview

Court Room Particiapants

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
682 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Court Room Particiapants
Courtroom Participants’ Professional Standards
Nidia Allan
CJA/224
10/24/12

Most people like to think that the Just system is perfect and does what is best for the people. In some cases it’s true however that is not always the case; Judges, Prosecutors, and Defense Attorneys are held at a high standard and help to determine the futures of people that commit crimes and provide justice for victims. It is important for everyone to understand that Judges, Prosecutors, and Attorneys are human and make mistakes and bad choices as we all do. I will talk about articles I’ve researched that show Prosecutorial misconduct, Ineffective assistance by criminal defense counsel, and Judicial misconduct. There was an article in CNN Justice that talked about California Prosecutors that committed over 130 instances of misconduct in 2010. The Article does not focus on one particular case it is focused on shedding light on many cases and prosecutorial misconduct that not only occurs here in the state of California but all over the country according to researchers of NCIP (Northern California Innocence Project). Between 1997 and 2010, the project found prosecutorial misconduct in more than 800 state and federal cases in California, and in 202 of them, the misconduct resulted in the setting aside of a conviction or sentence, a mistrial or a barring of evidence, the researchers found. In 614 of them, the misconduct didn't affect the fairness of the trial; the studies found in the more than 800 cases, 107 prosecutors committed misconduct. (cite) Unfortunately there are Prosecutors that cross the line and appear to not care because they probably don’t think they will get caught and that is wrong because they have people’s lives and futures in their hands. Some cases resulted in verdict reversals and the consequences for some attorneys was a slap on the wrist and were just cited for misconduct and others resulted suspension of license anywhere from 30days to four years. In the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Courtroom Chart

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages

    | |matters; they don't work with civil cases such as |citizens. This makes the prosecutor's duties somewhat |…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Court Systems Paper

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The court system was formed to separate the innocent from the guilty when a disparity has surfaced or developed. In the criminal justice system everyone is entitled to a fair and unbiased trial. We will be identifying and describing the distinguishing features of the major court system ranging from state level, superior court and federal district court through the U.S. Supreme Court. Second we will discuss the key players, jurisdiction rules, and interpretation on issues and the effect of evolving technologies on the court proceeding at all levels in the court system.…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Peter Rose Case

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When the people of the United States of America think of justice, depictions come to mind. To some, justice is represented by the Lady Justice standing strong with a long robe and scale in her hand. This scene is enough to represent the balance that is seen in the justice system hoping for a fair distribution of law, with no bias or corruption. Unfortunately as every American strives for justice to prevail, there are cases each year where this is not the case. False convictions have become prevalent in the court of law and should be addressed to be aware of such corruption. In this specific instance, Peter Rose is one of the thousands of cases each year where the accused was found guilty and later exonerated…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Everyone thinks they have it exactly right on TV shows like Law and Order or CSI. Someone commits a crime, is charged and found guilty all in an hour or two. For many crimes this is not the case, the offender may never be found, or someone maybe falsely convicted. It all hinges on a set of people. The judge, the defense attorney and the prosecutor. All of which are not perfect like the US Judicial System, and justice is not always served. Individual rights are violated due to prosecutorial misconduct, ineffective assistance by criminal defense counsel, and judicial misconduct. In some instances, the guilty…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Defense lawyers fail to prepare for trial or to do proper investigations on the crime and the defendant’s background. The result is inability to interrogate the witnesses and experts and as such cases end up in wrongful convictions (Stuntz, 2011).…

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter 5 describes how, within the last century, mounting scholarly evidence has exposed institutional flaws within our judicial and police systems, resulting in the convictions of innocent persons for capital crimes. In some cases, overzealous behavior by police and prosecutors, led to the imprisonment of “factually” innocent defendants. While police sometimes coerced confessions or failed to conduct full investigations, prosectors and judges failed to evidence which might exonerate the defendant. Other judicial violations found through study included failure to follow courtroom procedures related to rule of law. One of the first wrongful conviction initiatives was through a congressional investigation in 1912. Although a noble undertaking for its time, the reports was flawed in its evidentiary compilation. The data was poorly collected and its findings poorly deduced. According to the report, no innocent person had been executed by the Federal government.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Courtroom Observsation

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Xander Barden and Katelyn Lippa are the defendant’s (O’Malley’s Tavern and Patrick Gibbs) representatives they are recommending the Court present an outline verdict to the bartender, John Daniels and O’Malley’s Tavern. There is definite understanding and helpful information defined in the Indiana Dream Shop Act which contains useful knowledge. Mr. Edward Hard did not participate or take on any behavior or actions that provided proof of intoxication. Debora White, the Plaintiff is in search of compensation from the defendants, O’Malley’s Tavern and Patrick Gibbs with the theory that Mr. Patrick Gibbs had concrete awareness of Mr. Edward Hard’s consumption of alcohol. (I.C. 7.1-5-10-15.5, 1996) cites that Mr. Gibbs the defendant have actual knowledge of the person being intoxicated before damages are allowed to be awarded. Practical awareness does not persuade the hindrance nor does individual awareness. Indirect evidence doesn’t support practical awareness only actual knowledge. Individual awareness can sustain the intrusion whereas actual knowledge has to carry through and support the intrusion. Observable dealings with the recognizable events of intoxication are prejudiced according to the 7th Indiana State Circuit Court. In the Supreme Court statue stated prior to the year 1988 common law tolerated practical awareness for intrusions and caused a change in the law for this not to be supported.…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Significance of the Right to Effective Counsel in a Criminal Case and Powell v. Alabama…

    • 1666 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is somewhat an oxymoron to consider yourself a prosecutor and a good person. Paul Butler writes describing the discrepancies with progressive prosecutors who believes they are able to change the “definition” of a prosecutor. Butler defines a prosecutor as someone one who is “more part of the problem than the solution” and a person who is “geared toward punishing people whose lives are already messed up.” Furthermore, Butler qualifies his definition of a prosecutor by saying the job of some prosecutors is to “mitigate the harshness of the system.” This is a failed attempt to mend the system because their principal work applies the criminal laws instead of ameliorating its negative effects.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Frohmann conducted a seventeen month field study. She observed the prosecutorial case screening process of over three hundred cases in the sexual assault units of two separate west coast district attorney (DA) offices in 1989 and 1990 (Frohman,1991). She followed up her case screening with interviews of prosecutors in the sexual assault units and investigating officers to analyze their explanations and rationalizations for case rejections (Spohn, Beichner, & Davis-Frenzel, 2001). Frohmann notes that the DA’s office measures prosecutorial performance by conviction rates, encouraging prosecutors to pursue only winnable cases. Frohmann suggests that taking uncertain cases to trial that may result in not guilty verdicts is discouraged in three ways. First, the DA’s office views too many not-guilty verdicts as prosecutor incompetency. Second, prosecutors are rewarded for rejecting cases because it demonstrates their loyalty to office by reducing the huge case load of an overcrowded court system. Third, judges frown upon prosecutors pursuing cases that…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Michael Becker, a public defender in Orange County visited our class. Public defenders are people who defense for people who cannot afford to hire a lawyer. Public Defenders consider their clients as the most important thing, and they treat their clients with dignity and respect since most of their clients are on the margins of the society, and they are not treated with respect. Even though public defenders receive funding from the government, they do not represent the government. Orange county had public offenders for 70 years, which is longer than the federal public offenders with the history of 50 years. I could tell public defenders disliked the district attorneys by Michael’s description of district attorneys and the way he talks about…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A prosecutor has limited constraints when bringing charges against someone. A prosecutor cannot bring charges vindictively against a person because a defendant successfully appealed a conviction. In the presence of probable cause the prosecutor is not permitted to bring charges for such improper reasons. It would be inappropriate for a prosecutor to bring charges against someone is if he or she knew that the evidence was tampered with, like improper behavior of a cop. If the attorney knew that the evidence given was under false pretense or had been fabricated, filing charges would be inappropriate. Another case would be if the lawyer trust that there is insufficient evidence to convict or if the case is not sufficiently strong to warrant an indictment. A prosecutor choosing that…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are many parts of the courtroom work group professionals who successfully pursuit justice and the process of convicting a criminal. The courtroom work group has a major role in convicting and finalizing a case. In the courtroom work group, there are three groups of people that hold the entire courtroom together. Without the work group, the courtroom would not flow, and coming to a conclusion to the case would not be as easy. The work group is made up of the Judge, the Defense Attorney, Public Defender, Court Recorders, and the Prosecutor Attorney. Which all are part of the courtroom work group which they work together to reach a decision, in the case by interacting among themselves and who’s involved an implicit recognition and rule of civility, cooperation, and sharing their goals. There are many roles in the work group, and if they are not all followed through with then the results could be different than what they should be. In this paper, we will look at the roles of the prosecutor, how the criminal justice funnel effects the courtroom work group and what will help eliminate the funnel and reduce the backlog of cases.…

    • 1422 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Right to Counsel

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The right to counsel is a fundamental right in the United States criminal justice system. As the country has matured, the concept has evolved and expanded significantly to promote due process and confidence in the entire system. The concept has evolved to the point that most successful attorneys elect to use private counsel when they themselves are the subject of criminal proceedings. To develop an appreciation of the right to counsel in the United States, individuals need to take the initiative to examine its historical roots and progress over time.…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The National Federation of Paralegal System (NFPA) is a very well known organization who has comprised paralegal association of individual and throughout the Canada and United States. They have their own job responsibilities that reflecting the diversity if parallel profession. This is also the responsibility of NFPA paralegal association that every individual legal supervisor does not break the law and perform their duties under given considerations (Zoubek, 2012, p. 26). On the other hand, ABA Models Rules settled by America Bar Association (ABA) for setting the rules according to the standards lawyer’s professional responsibilities and legal ethics in United States of America.…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics