Preview

Corruption in International Arbitration

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4689 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Corruption in International Arbitration
Authored by: Pavan K Rao Polkampally
For 4th Government Law College
International Law Summit, Mumbai

Authored by: Pavan K Rao Polkampally
For 4th Government Law College
International Law Summit, Mumbai | Corruption in International Arbitration | | |

| Corruption in International Arbitration | | |

Introduction
This paper is the result of the research work done by Pavan K Rao Polkampally studying 1st Yr. of BA.LLB. at Damodaram Sanjivayya National Law University, Vizag for the 4th Government Law College International Law Summit.
Corruption in International Arbitration presents an in-brief access to the present Arbitration proceedings related to corruption. It shows us how corruption is dealt in the International Arbitration Arena, the International Laws, if any to deal with it and also its nature.
Arbitration, as known has been one of the best forms of ADR ( Alternate Dispute Resolution ). It is basically a tribunal, not necessarily a group of people who gives the award upon the complete hearing of the case which does not take a prolonged period unlike the normal cases in courts. As said by a eminent legal personality “Commercial arbitration must have existed since the dawn of commerce.”
Corruption on the other hand is a very rapidly growing menace which has to be tackled mainly in the International Arena. Arbitration relating to corruption comes into action when there are cases of Corruption trans-nationally and which needs speedy disbursal of reward, which involves very big amounts at stake. There have been many a laws and a few treaties to stop the crime of corruption which mainly draws its shape into bribing of foreign federal officials. And in the very recent years only, there has been a growing importance for the need of International Laws that can restrain corruption from growing. There has been attention drawn in from as many as 60 nations regarding the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    influence of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act will also be discussed. The paper will be…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions and Related Documents, 2011,…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Arbitration is a relatively fast way to arrive upon a decision when two parties are in a dispute. Arbitration has definite benefits such as being flexible and not as formal as a traditional courthouse. Usually, arbitration can be scheduled quicker and with less working parts than a trial. In rare instances, if all parties involved come to an agreement, arbitrators can sometimes create rulings that judges are not allowed to decide. In arbitration, both sides present all evidence to an arbitrator in efforts to prove each side’s case. The arbitrator reaches a final verdict and decides whom the winners and losers are. An arbitrator does the job that a traditional judge or jury would normally do in court if the matter escalated to that point (Hill…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The fact is that domestic law has nothing to do with international law and companies should be ready to face any issue that could appear. The second week material offered more information on how to handle international issues. The forum selection is the most important thing to do when trying to avoid future conflicts of law. Litigation and arbitration are the best options for organizations involved in international disputes. Legal advice or counseling is a useful resource that could help avoid confusions and setbacks in the future; it is always better to be…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR) offers all the advantages of the federal judicial system and then some. Along with fixed rules and the possibility of appeal, it allows for speed, confidentiality, cost efficiency, customized resolutions, and enforceability. These make ADR a good arbitration option for a whole range of complex commercial cases like securities, professional malpractice, patent litigation, personal injury litigation and bankruptcy mediation.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some of the most popular forms of non-traditional ADR are Arbitration, Mediation and Negotiation. Arbitration is a legal technique where the parties to a dispute refer it to one or more persons, the arbitrators, by whose decision they agree to be bound. ("Arbitration," 2012) Some of the advantages of arbitration over traditional litigation is usually must faster to come to an agreement, it cost less money and usually the proceedings and terms of the agreement do not make it to the public. In contrast a traditional trial can last quite a long time and can become very expensive, as the judge and jury come to a conclusion, not to mention the media attention that the case could potentially get bringing both parties into the spot light.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Going to trial is not the best option to resolve disputes. The majority of people use Alternative Dispute Resolutions or ADR, these procedures are less formal and controversial than going to trial to attain an agreement. Besides going to court people has the possibility to use other procedures, the most commonly used are mediation and arbitration.…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    An effective judiciary has to be an advocate against corruption and assure fairness in legal procedures. Unfortunately, people’s experiences in court are often far from fair. Judges can also bribe or be bribed, or they can suffer pressure from above. If politicians abuse their power, they can influence decisions and mislead courts’ lawful procedures by bribing justices. Judicial corruption endures as a serious barrier to citizen’s right and undermines basic human rights issues such as right to fair trial. In this paper, I am going to look at corruption among white-collar employees (government officials) and how it violates basic human rights. We are going to see how in the Unites States, a country that has checks and balances, corruption is…

    • 1890 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Credit Card Companies

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In arbitration, a dispute is handled by a "neutral" third party that hears both sides and makes a decision. Just about any type of dispute, whether it's between a worker and an employer, a retailer and a customer, or an insurance company and a policyholder, can be arbitrated. Attorneys agree that arbitration has its advantages. For one, it's faster. The American Bar Association estimates it takes two years for the average court case to be resolved, compared with 8.6 months for arbitration. Expediency can save thousands in legal costs.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Geographical Indications

    • 8885 Words
    • 36 Pages

    With Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) increasingly influencing trades both at the national and international level; harnessing trade benefits depends on the degree of protection…

    • 8885 Words
    • 36 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The similarities to traditional litigation system with the nontraditional forms of ADR are, they both reach to a resolution, but the methods they approach are different. In a traditional litigation system a complaint is filed with a court and a plaintiff will respond to the complaint in a certain wait period or in the order it was received. On response from plaintiff, each party is allowed to present their case in a pre-trial and further followed by a trial. The final decision will be issued by a judge or a jury based on the evidence from each party. “The most common form of ADR is arbitration. Other forms of ADR are negotiation, mediation, conciliation, mini-trial, fact-finding and using a judicial referee” (Cheeseman, 2010). ADR has different approaches to resolve a dispute. It is believed that negotiation is a simplest form of ADR. Negotiation is a method, when the parties involved in a lawsuit, meet to find an alternative resolution such as compromise or agreeable resolution related to the dispute prior to the trial. Negotiation is flexible and parties may choose this method before and after filing the lawsuit. Further it can be applied before other forms of ADR’s are engaged in. Arbitration is a method, when the parties involved in a lawsuit, choose a third party who is impartial and neutral to resolve the dispute. The third party is referred as Arbitrators. Arbitrators can make final decisions. This method is normally used in consumer and employment matters…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    grievance

    • 2615 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Arbitration in United States law is a form of alternative dispute resolution; a legal alternative to litigation whereby the parties involved in a dispute agree to submit their respective positions through an agreement or a hearing held in front of a neutral third party often known as an arbitrator for a resolution to the disagreement. In general, arbitration is used as a substitute too the legal systems, particularly when legal processes are viewed as slow, expensive or biased. Arbitration is also used by communities that may lack formal law. Arbitration can also serve a distinct purpose: such as an alternative to strikes and lockouts as a means of resolving labor disputes. Labor arbitration comes in two varieties: interest arbitration, which provides a method for resolving disputes about the terms to be included in a new contract when the parties are unable to agree and grievance arbitration which provides a method for resolving disputes over the interpretation and application of a collective bargaining agreement (SECLaw.com) 2000.…

    • 2615 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In 1969, a series of disputes had come upon the attention of the International Court of Justice and they had been known as The North Sea Continental Shelf cases. The parties involved in the disputes were Denmark, Germany and the Netherlands and were in relation to the delimitation or creation of boundary lines of areas which were rich in oil and gas in the continental shelf in the North Sea.…

    • 1506 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before I answer the question, we better cite the existing situation we have regarding the AFP corruption and analyze this situation. Carlos Garcia of Armed forces of the Philippines was accused of plunder. The appearance of witness Heidi Mendoza of Commission on Audit became a big help in investigation. They proved that Garcia is guilty. But Ombudsman Gutierrez believed that the allegation to Garcia is weak, or that there's no enough evidence. She and the special prosecutors proposed a plea bargain agreement with Garcia. The bargain asserts that Garcia will return P135 million of the P300 million that he took. The plea bargain deal was a tacit admission that Garcia was guilty of plunder.…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Doctrine of Competence

    • 2160 Words
    • 9 Pages

    When deciding if whether the arbitral tribunal is empowered to rule on its own jurisdiction, the judge should look into the contract between the parties. Firstly is…

    • 2160 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics