Preview

Corporate Social Responsibility in the Marketplace

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3112 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Corporate Social Responsibility in the Marketplace
In understanding the subject of social responsibility in business, there are many varying views and theories presented. The argument, at the extremes, is one that is purely economic in nature and the other that requires corporation’s responsibility to society. Today society demands social responsiveness of businesses in the marketplace. A businesses’ failure to act socially or ethically responsible, in some cases, could form the foundation for its own peril. My paper attempts to define social responsibility, discuss views and theories, and provide case examples where businesses respond to situations in the global marketplace. The argument that corporation’s responsibility to shareholders to maximize profits as a sole objective is no longer acceptable by society. The purely economic view of the issue will not suffice. Businesses will always seek to maximize profits, but companies are increasingly aware that organizational values and social responsiveness play to the very heart of their goals in the pursuit of profits. “What does it mean for a corporation to be socially responsible? The concept is described by many terms. It has been called, “profit making only”, “going beyond profit making”, “voluntary activities”, “concern for the broader social system”, and “social responsiveness”. “Most focused attention is on the two extremes. On one side, there is the classical-or purely economic view, and on the other side, there is the socioeconomic position” (Robbins/Coulter 100). First, we will explore four theories of social responsibility. The four legal theories surrounding the issue are maximizing profits, moral minimum, stakeholder interest, and corporate citizenship.

Maximizing profits is the traditional or classic view. This view is concerned with maximizing profits for shareholders. “This view, which dominated the nineteenth century, holds that the interests of other constituencies, (e.g., employees, suppliers, residents of communities) are not



Cited: Cheeseman, Henry R., Business Law, Legal, E-Commerce, Ethical, and International Environments, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey; Pearson 2006, 155-160. Robbins, Stephen P, and Mary Coulter, Management, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey; Pearson 2005, 100-106. Baker, Mallen, “Arguments against Corporate Social Responsibility” Mallen Baker .net 22 April 2006 <http://www.mallenbaker.net/csr/CSRfiles/against.html> Nieuwlands, Hans, “Heeding the call: more and more, stakeholders are demanding that corporations live up to their social responsibilities and institute practices that value people, communities, and the environment.”, Internal Auditor, August 2003 Issue,<www.allbusiness.com/periodicals/publications/41446-1-2.html> Ostas, Daniel T., “Cooperate, comply, or evade? A corporate executive 's social responsibilities with regard to law”, American Business Law Journal, Summer 2004 Issue, <www.allbusiness.com/periodicals/article/461803-1.html>

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Corporate social responsibility (CSR) as a topic has received the attention of organisations and managers as a whole. The 1950s marked the start of the modern era of CSR for managers, where Howard R. Bowen (1953) defines social responsibilities in his publication as the businesses’ duty to make decision and follow principles that are acceptable to society. However, Milton Friedman (1970) argued that social responsibilities is for people not businesses, he claims that the only responsibility business managers should have is to use all their resources to maximise profit and increase shareholder’s wealth (Friedman, York Times Magazine, September 13, 1970, pp. 32-34).…

    • 2250 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The different aspects of corporate social responsibility (CSR) have been the topic of considerable debate since the last decades of the twentieth century. Main factor for the increased interest on the part of stakeholders in this topic are the increased public awareness and interest in the corporate social responsibility following the Information Revolution. This essay will assess the dangers and benefits of the business ethics for most of the stakeholders – employees, organizations, society, shareholders and the environment. It will also explore specific examples of corporate social responsibility in different large corporations and will make a comparison between two large companies’ ethical policies. The position that I will defend is that people behind corporations are the ones who can be philanthropic but enterprises themselves can only be driven by the laws of market (which in the modern economic reality in most Western countries demands an increasing attention to business ethics).…

    • 1916 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Corporate Social Responsibility can be defined has an obligation beyond that required law and economics , for a firm to purse long term goals that are good for the society. This entails the continuing commitment by business to behave ethically and contribute to economic development while improving quality of the workforce and their families as well as that of the local community and society at large. Bhatia (2004) defined corporate social responsibility as a tool that encompass good business ethics and encourage enterprises to be involved in social issues such as community improvement, improving underdeveloped working conditions and so on that are outside walls of the enterprise. Aleix Ferrer Duch (2009) views Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) as a continuous commitment by businesses to behave ethically and contribute to economic development while improving the quality of life of society at large. It is about enterprises deciding to go beyond minimum legal requirements and obligations stemming from collective agreements in order to address societal needs. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) does not have one particular definition as evidenced in the above definitions by different authors. Some define it as operating in a manner that meets or exceeds the ethical, legal, commercial and public expectations that society has of business; whereas other define it as doing business in an ethical way that respects people, society and the environment”(NEPALI 2008).…

    • 1723 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    When we place our first step into the world of business, we have heard businessmen speak expressively about the aim of the company is to make profit and not to address social responsibilities. This is only certain truth to this statement as the world we live in now is evolving. People in the current era are more concern about social responsibility especially with corporations and their behaviours and plans. There is an increasing demand on businesses to have a “social conscience” and taking serious responsibility for providing employment, eliminating discrimination, ethical working environment and whatever else is related to having a “social conscience”.…

    • 2824 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The present-day conception of corporate social responsibility (CSR) implies that companies voluntarily integrate social and environmental concerns in their operations and interaction with stakeholders. The European Commission defines it as “a concept whereby companies decide voluntarily to contribute to a better society and a cleaner environment.” (European Commission, 2001, p. 5) It is related to complex issues such as environmental protection, human resources management, health and safety at work, relations with local communities, relations with suppliers and consumers. The notion of CSR is one of ethical and moral issues surrounding corporate decision making and behaviour. Knowing if a company should undertake certain activities or refrain from doing so because they are beneficial or harmful to society is a central question. Social issues deserve moral consideration of their own and should lead managers to consider the social impacts of corporate activities in decision making. Regardless of any stakeholders’ pressures, actions which lead to things such as the conservation of the Earth’s natural resources or bio-diversity preservation, are morally praiseworthy. However, some argue that the contribution of concepts such as CSR is just a reminder that the search for profit should be constrained by social considerations (Valor, 2005, p. 199). Increasingly CSR is analysed as a source of competitive advantage and not as an end in itself (Branco and Rodrigues, 2006). In effect, the concept of CSR has evolved from being regarded as detrimental to a company’s profitability, to being considered as somehow benefiting the company as a whole, at least in the long run (see, for example, Hess et al., 2002; Porter and Kramer, 2002; Smith, 2003).…

    • 11526 Words
    • 33 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Social Responsability

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Social Responsibility is a “business’ obligation to pursue policies, make decisions, and take actions that benefit society”. Under the umbrella of social responsibility there are two models for social responsibility; the shareholder model, and the stakeholder model. Basically, The shareholder model Focus’ on maximizing profit for its shareholder’s. When a company makes profit and meet their production goals they in turn benefit the community. This is made possible through job creation and tax money paid throughout production, sales, and individual taxes for the employee just to name a few. The stakeholder model includes the owners, the customers, the suppliers, the community, and the Government. The stakeholder model is when the business thoughtfully makes decisions giving intentional thought to how the individual groups will be affected. The main difference that stands out is that the shareholder model is indirect, and the stakeholder model is intentionally planned out. Of the two models presented, the most beneficial to society is the stakeholder model. This is due to careful planning out the cause and effect of the business’ decisions and how they will impact the stakeholders.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    ‘Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is a long-term strategy, uniquely relevant to the twenty-first century, in which responsible social change can become a source of innovation and profits rather than added cost‘ (Vogel, David J, 2005, p.19). ‘Those that don't make that effort won't be a problem because ultimately they won't be around.’ (L. Hunter Lovins, 2006, p.26). Obviously, CSR is no longer a new strategy to companies nowadays.…

    • 2685 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Drivers of Csr

    • 5620 Words
    • 23 Pages

    Matthew Haigh, University of Amsterdam Marc T. Jones, Ashridge Business School Abstract The paper criticises the dominant discourse of corporate social responsibility (CSR) by examining six sets of factors conventionally considered as promoting outcomes consistent with core principles of social responsibility: intra-organizational factors, competitive dynamics, institutional investors, end-consumers, government regulators and non-governmental organizations. Each factor is addressed conceptually, empirically, and with respect to its likely future significance in promoting outcomes consistent with CSR. Our overall conclusions are not promising on any of these dimensions. CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND STAKEHOLDERE MANAGEMENT Business ethicists borrow from the works of such as Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau to assert that normative obligations on the firm imposed by the social contract require constructive responses to the needs of owner and non-owner groups (Palmer, 2001). Ethics and responsibility are most often unreflexively presented as atomised problems for individual decision-makers in the firm, solvable through straightforward application of logical rules and codes of conduct. Relevant definitions of responsibility are narrow: “issues of corporate responsibility are of smaller scope than the ethical foundations of capitalism” (Goodpaster, 1983, p. 3). Ethical questions are restricted to external corporate effects such as the means of production, in which relevant questions are held to arise in places such as stockholder and consumer protection and occupational health and safety. Exemplary behaviour is encoded in governance guidelines emanating from organisations such as stock exchanges. Departing from the deference that conventional approaches to CSR show toward corporate interests, Daly (1996) calls for systems thinking on sustainable economic development as a tenable…

    • 5620 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Organizations have many obligations and responsibilities to fulfill, which include economical, legal and ethical responsibilities, to name a few. Those social responsibilities (among others) must be fulfilled in order to satisfy its Stakeholders and guarantee it’s long-term survival. According to Investopedia, the new field of corporate social responsibility (CSR) has encouraged companies to take the interests of all stakeholders into consideration during their decision-making processes instead of making choices based solely upon the interests of shareholders.…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this essay, I am going to prove that a business organization should be socially responsible in a successful or an effective manner which will eventually benefit the company’s owners or shareholders. I will do so through illustrating the different potential effects of a business organization engaging in Corporate Social Responsibility (“CSR”). The effects that will be shown in this essay would be an increase and decrease in the company’s expenses, sustaining and harming the environment, increase and decrease in sales and customers, improve the lives of people inside and outside the company, and the practice of social irresponsibility. I will also be providing actual companies engage in CSR, and its effects on each company. I will be citing several companies such as Petite Four Legs, Panga Organics, Verdigris Group, Cisco, British Petroleum, DLA Piper, PepsiCo, and Enron. All of these companies engage in some kind of social responsibility and may or may not have a positive effect on them.…

    • 2089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The social responsibility of corporations. It pertains to consideration of, and response to, issues beyond the narrow economic, technical, and legal requirements of the firm to accomplish social benefits along with the traditional economic gains that the firm seeks. The corporate responsibility of firms have been put to the side by managers, today the issues are now first on the corporate agenda (Peng, p. 363). A firm’s first responsibility should be first to the stakeholders. Stakeholders are any person that can affect or be affected by the company success or failures. Firms are not obligated to be social agencies but it would be in their best interest to give back to the communities they reside. Many firms are successful due to the people in their communities buying their products and services. When it comes down to the debate weather firms should get involved with CSR is a debate. Milton Friedman, a former University of Chicago economist and Nobel laureates argued “The business of business is business.” Businesses shouldn’t be morally neutral but doing business is a great opportunity to do some good and bring glory to God through its contributions.…

    • 963 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Research Paper

    • 4109 Words
    • 17 Pages

    In today’s changing world, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is a growing area of interest for academics, practitioners and entrepreneurs, in terms of both theory and practice. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is a concept whereby companies integrate social, environmental and health concerns in their business strategy (policy) and operations and in their interactions with stakeholders on a voluntary basis. The social responsibility of business encompasses the economic, legal, ethical, and discretionary expectations that society has of organizations at a given point in time (Carroll, 1979). As the world is shrinking due to globalization the concept of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has acquired an undeniably high degree of relevance and scope in a large number of sectors. Many academicians and practitioners…

    • 4109 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    To give a better view about the problems cited in this work, the researchers gave a review to these related literature and studies. These literature and studies, both local and foreign, summarized and discussed below concerns with the subjects relating to the factors, concepts, and issues regarding corporate social responsibility of business organizations.…

    • 7677 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Corporate social responsibility is a concept that has been around for decades. It emerged as an issue when law makers, stakeholders, and the general public began focusing on ethical and responsible corporate behavior, also referred to as “corporate citizenship” (Carroll, A., 1998). According to Carroll (1998), there are four facets of corporate citizenship. These facets are: 1) corporates fulfilling their economic responsibilities and be profitable, 2) corporates obeying the law, 3) corporates being ethically responsible, and 4) corporates making charitable contributions, however, “defining socially responsible corporate behavior is not a straightforward exercise” (Campbell, J. L., 2007, p. 950).…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We all know that profit an enterprise earns is not only made by itself, but also by a result of the interaction between consumers, politics and the society environment of the enterprise being at. If an enterprise wants to operate in the long run, it needs to be concerned about the problem of its surrounding environment. Also, only a corporation which can shoulder responsibilities of society and obey the rule of ethic deserves to obtain support from the society. In this essay, I am going to discuss about whether if the strategy of Corporate Social Responsibility is relevant. The concept of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), like ethics, is easy to understand: it means distinguish right from wrong, and doing right. It means being a good corporate citizen. The formal definition of social responsibility is management’s obligation to make choices and take actions that will contribute to the welfare and interests of society as well as the organization (Szwajkowski, 1986: Davis et al., 1979). CSR is a kind of philosophic conception, it does not have tangible executive criteria and rules. A lack of the spirit of CSR, we cannot find the meaning and reputation of why this enterprise exists. Companies and people need profounder meaning of exist. Nowadays, CSR strategy is overall acceptable by the managers of every enterprise. However, there are numerous of people have been arguing about their different beliefs, many of the experts debate about CSR. Milton Friedman and others have argued that a corporation's purpose is to maximize returns to its shareholders, and that since (in their view), only people can have social responsibilities, corporations are only responsible to their shareholders and not to society as a whole. Milton Friedman have pointed out this in his book, Capitalism and Freedom: "There is one and only one social responsibility of business - to use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits so long as it stays within the rules of…

    • 815 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays