2. Which of the two court is superior in the impeachment case the Supreme Court or the Impeachment Court
3. Cold Neutrality of Impartial Judges
First and foremost regarding the SALN of Chief Justice Corona the prosecution claims that CJ Corona has 45 properties. However they were able to present only 21 properties which in his account named after him and his family. According to a key member of the President Aquino’s Cabinet the government has evidence to prove that Chief Justice Renato Corona has ill-gotten wealth that could not have been acquired with his salary in the judiciary, and the evidence would be presented by the House prosecution team in the impeachment trial. Followed by the Presidential adviser on political affairs Ronald Llamas saying that “The House prosecution panel obtained documents that would show that Corona may have amassed ill-gotten wealth, including at least four multimillion-peso real estate properties,” . Meanwhile Corona says “Many of those in the list are not ours. They are owned by people I don’t even know; some by parents of our children-in-law,”. Still the House prosecution panel will ask the Senate impeachment court to subpoena Corona’s statement of assets, liabilities and net worth (SALN) for 2010. The prosecution is saying that “They are refusing to release the SALN despite our repeated appeal. We have no option but to ask the impeachment court to subpoena it during the trial,” . IBP reacts on the release of the SALN saying that the prosecution’s matching Corona’s income tax returns (ITRs) with his statements of assets, liabilities and net worth (SALNs) has not established prima facie presumption of guilt to warrant Corona’s conviction. Emphasizing also that 1379, or the law stipulating the handling of properties found to have been unlawfully acquired by public officers or employees. The lawyers’ group said RA 1379 states that prima facie guilt can be established “only if the public officer during his incumbency acquired an amount of property manifestly out of proportion to his salary as such public officer or employee and to his other lawful income and income from legitimately acquired property.”. Addition to this the IBP adds that “The prosecution therefore needs to show not only CJ’s salary, but also the fact the CJ does not have any ‘other lawful income’ and ‘income from legitimately acquired property’ before it can claim that it has prima facie proven that CJ is guilty of graft and corruption,” a lawyer named Romulo Macalintal questioned the prosecution panel’s justification for presenting the ITRs of the Chief Justice and his wife Cristina during hearings the hearings. Macalintal explained that showing the discrepancy between Corona’s income and assets through the testimony of Commissioner Henares – a member of President Aquino’s Cabinet – would not suffice to establish proof that several assets of the Coronas were ill-gotten. He believes the Chief Justice can afford to purchase millions worth of properties because he has been getting some P2.4 million per year from tax-exempt allowances for his being a member of the Presidential Electoral Tribunal, Senate Electoral Tribunal and House of Representatives Electoral Tribunal. He debunked the claim of Henares that Corona only receives an average of P600,000 per year based on the alpha list of taxpayers from the Supreme Court. Prosecution panel spokesman Marikina Rep. Miro Quimbo told a news conference Prosecutors want to find out if Corona made a “proper declaration” of the 300-square-meter penthouse unit at the Bellagio Tower in Bonifacio Global City in Taguig, which the Chief Justice and his wife acquired in 2009 for P14.5 million. “We want to ask him how they purchased the property, if they had the legal means to acquire it. We will prove that they did not have such means,” he said. But according to law said by IBP spokesman and Northern Luzon governor Dennis Habawel “Under the...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document