Preview

Contract Law in Great Britain and the Usa

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
5431 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Contract Law in Great Britain and the Usa
CONTRACT LAW IN GREAT BRITAIN AND THE USA
Key terms and specific concepts

I FORM

Deeds, specialty contracts, contracts under seal (# simple contracts)
Statute of Frauds 1677, s.4
Property Act 1925, s.1, s.40, s.136 ; 1989, s.1(3)(a), s.2(1)
Consumer Credit Act 1974, s.67, s.68
Uniform Commercial Code 2-201 ( 2-202 Parol Evidence Rule)

Jinright v. Russell (1971) Mulford v. Borg-Wagner Acceptance Corp. (1985)

II TERMS

A) TERMS IMPLIED BY STATUTE
Sale of Goods Act 1979, s.12, s.13 s.14, s.15 (1994 : « satisfactory quality »)
UCC 2-314, 2-315

B) TERMS IMPLIED BY THE COMMON LAW (« business efficacy », « officious bystander »)
The Moorcock (1889)
Hillas v. Arcos (1932)
Shirlaw v. Southern Foundries (1939)
Luxor (Eastbourne) v. Cooper (1941)
British Crane Hire v. Ipswich Plant Hire (1975)
Liverpool City Council v. Irwin (1976)
Shell v. Lostock Garage (1977)
Sim v. Rotherham Metroplitan Borough Council (1986)
Bayles v. Barnett (1988)

C) CONDITIONS, WARRANTIES, INNOMINATE TERMS
Sale of Goods Act 1979, s.11, s.53

Poussard v. Spiers and Pond (1876) Bettini v. Gye (1876) Hong Kong Fir Shipping Co. V. Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha (1962) (Mihalis Angelos) Maredelante Compania Naviera SA v. Bergban-Handel (1971) The Hansa Nord (1975) Reardon Smith Line v. Yngvar Hansen-Tangen (1976)

D) EXEMPTION CLAUSES, CONTRA PROFERENTEM RULE
Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977, s.2, s.3
UCC 2-302, 2-316 L’Estrange v. Graucob (1934) Olley v. Marlborough Court Hotel (1949) Curtis v. Chemical Cleaning and Dyeing Co. (1951) Karsales (Harrow), Ltd. v. Wallis (1956) Suisse Atlantique v. N.V. Rotterdamsche Kolen Centrale (1967) Thornton v. Shoe Lane Parking (1971) Hollier v. Rambler Motors (1972) Photo Productions v. Securicor Transports (1980) Ailsa Craig Fishing Co. V. Malvern Fishing Co. (1983) George Mitchell v. Finney Lock Seeds (1983) Gimpel v. Host Enterprise, Inc. (1986) Thompson v. T.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    PASS 2 UNIT 3 A

    • 840 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Sale of Goods act 1979 – All goods must meet the main three criteria. The goods must be as described, of satisfaction quality and fit for purpose. If the seller does not meet the criteria they are breaching the contract and the buyer will have to claim under the Sale of Good Act 1979…

    • 840 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unit 3 - P2

    • 1921 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The sales of goods act 1979 is one of the most important asks which all businesses are obliged to follow. The sales of goods act states that business must only sell goods that are as described in marketing (packaging, advertisements, etc.) This means businesses cannot advertise an Apple iMac and then sell a Pear iMac to their customers. Another part of the sale of goods act which businesses have to follow is the part of the act which states that products must be ‘of satisfactory quality’; this means that businesses can only sell products which are of decent quality and not products which wall fall apart when used on first instance. Businesses must ensure that all of their products are described accurately so that they do not fail to follow this act. If a business’s product is not deemed to pass this regulation then the business must substantiate any claims that are made against their products.…

    • 1921 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business p2 unit 2

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The sales of goods act just implies that the business must ensure all their products are satisfactory and they sell goods to their requirements and it must meet the description.…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Industrial relations exam notes

    • 27230 Words
    • 109 Pages

    18 Terms implied for business efficacy ............................................................................................ 19 Implication due to industry custom practice .............................................................................. 19 2/80 Employment and Industrial Relations Law Notes – S1/2007 Work rules................................................................................................................................... 19 Terms implied at common law ....................................................................................................…

    • 27230 Words
    • 109 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Common Law Contracts

    • 1491 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Course Hero has millions of student submitted documents similar to the one below including study guides, practice problems, reference materials, practice exams, textbook help and tutor support.…

    • 1491 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The sales of goods act requires traders to sell goods that are as the described and advertised. The product must also be of satisfactory quality.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sales of goods act requires traders to sell goods that are as they are described and of satisfactory quality. It also gives customers certain legal rights when they buy goods. This directly affects marketing activity because it means that any product should be described accurately and be able to verify any claims.…

    • 1343 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under this legislation, goods bought from a trader should be: of satisfactory quality, as described, fit for purpose. For JLR this would mean that they have to ensure that they comply with this act in order to keep customer satisfaction. If they do not manage to do this, it may result in loss of customers and sales.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this document I will be discussing business law. I will be comparing and contrasting…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Contract Law

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “To create a binding agreement the acceptance must occur, and that ‘acceptance’ must be final and absolutely unconditional. This is clear under Australian contract law.”…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under the Sales of Goods Act 1979 a company has to follow rules and regulations by law; this gives customers certain legal rights such as the right to return an item that may be faulty, if they want a refund or if they want to exchange the item for something else.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Customers ought to additionally stay informed concerning the quality of the merchandise they buy, and be alarm for any changes in quality between the recently bought item and one obtained previously. Low-quality merchandise ought to be accounted for to the genuine maker or a suitable regulatory office to figure out if or not they are…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this essay I will outline the remedies available in cases of defective goods from the Sale of Goods Act 1979 and the criteria that constitutes a material breach. I will then go on to outline the other remedies available in supply of goods cases such as hire purchase and hire etc., using the Supply of Goods (Implied Terms) Act 1973 and the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982. After discussing all the remedies available, I will then evaluate the adequacy of the law relating to these remedies through case examples and decide whether this law can be considered satisfactory.…

    • 3633 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Breach of contract

    • 992 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Under the Sale of Goods Act (1979), there are strict rules that a seller/ retailer must abide by once they have entered into a contract. The goods must be as described (section 13), of satisfactory quality (section 14 [2]) and fit for purpose (section 14 [3]). Both section 13 and 14 have strict liability attached to them. The court will not investigate into the mind of the seller at the time or observe how much they tried but all they will look for is if there is a breach in the contract and if there is, the seller is liable.…

    • 992 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    LAW416

    • 367 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Explain the meaning of "goods" according to the Sale of Goods Act 1957 and discuss…

    • 367 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays