Preview

Constitutional Law and European Integration

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1513 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Constitutional Law and European Integration
There are few cases that rival Factortame in being concurrently substantively clear and decisive, and perplexing as to its full impact. The scope of the change to the UK constitution that has been instigated by it and other European Court of Justice decisions has been conceptualised as ranging from a ‘legal evolution’ to ‘revolution’. Although some theories are more convincing than others, each faces its own weaknesses. However, notwithstanding the conclusion of this particular speculative debate, the processes of European integration has undoubtedly quickened the pace at which UK Parliament and courts as part of a globalised world have had to squarely confront these constitutional changes, especially the departure from Parliament’s stronghold over the constitution. A Diceyan view of the UK constitution is no longer compatible with the current relationship between UK and EU law. It was decided in Factortame and confirmed in Equal Opportunities Commission, that the implications of the European Communities Act 1972 s.2(4) is that EU law has supremacy in the case of clashes between EU and national laws. Within the orthodox view that Parliament is absolutely sovereign, inconsistencies between Acts of Parliament are to be dealt with by applying the doctrine of explicit or implied repeal to give effect to the later Act which is simply another illustration of how no Parliament can bind its successors. It would never have been open to national courts to declare provisions within primary statute incompatible with EC law either temporarily or permanently as it is today. However, so long as UK remains a part of the EU, EU law will prevail when inconsistencies arise and any derogation from this position will have to be done expressly and unequivocally. Therefore, even if the current position of Parliamentary sovereignty cannot clearly be defined, Factortame and EOC alone emphasise the unworkability of a Diceyan view of Parliamentary sovereignty in an European context. A

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The UK’s unwritten constitution, formed of Acts of Parliament [AoP], Royal Prerogative [RP], Constitutional Convention [CC] and Case Law [CL], prompts much debate about the ease of which constitutional change can be introduced. A written constitution is, by definition and practice, hard to alter however it remains to be seen whether it is any easier to change an unwritten constitution. While the natural answer seems to be that it is easier to alter, practical considerations seem to indicate an opposite reality.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Though it has been argued that the supposed supremacy of parliament is eroding due to the development of law such as entering the European Union in 1972 which now oversee and have the ability to override domestic law . The apparent problem with this is that UK legislatures no longer have power to enact legislation without abiding to EU law requirements . According to Sir William Wade, this resulted in what was said to be “constitutionally impossible” to do as the parliament of 1972 were now bounded by future parliaments which ultimately undermines the legal doctrine of parliamentary supremacy. A clear example is in the case of Factortame when it went against the UK’s constitutional practice that the most recent legislation was to prevail as priority, but instead invoked the European Communities Act 1972 over the Merchant Shipping Act which was passed in 1988 on the basis that when entering the European Communities (now known as European Union) the parliament made the agreement of “permanent limitation of their sovereign rights” and that should domestic…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The flexibility of the British constitution is also shown through the constitutional reforms developed by Labour, which not only modernised by also is argued to have strengthened the British constitution. Due to this ability of being flexible and being able to change and adapt, the case for Britain retaining its constitution is in fact ‘extremely strong’.…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    United Kingdom changing radically with Labour’s landslide victory , the greatest since 1945. Led by Tony Blair, the party promised an ambitious programme of constitutional reforms which they themselves claimed would lead to “the most ambitious and far reaching changes to the constitution undertaken by any government in this century” (Hazell, Sinclair, 1999, p42)These reforms were also pioneered by Gordon Brown when he became Blair’s successor in 2007. While some of these amendments were successfully implemented others were abandoned or were watered down greatly. Also, the planned reversal of many of these reforms and other amendments made by the recent coalition Government must also be deliberated , however, as the coalition Government has only been in in power two years it is harder to see if they have had any real effect yet . Therefore this essay will focus on the constitutional reforms made by New Labour and will discuss that while they have made a difference, the impact has been limited and far less radical than they first proposed.…

    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    One factor which can be argued to of had the biggest effect in terms of changing where parliamentary sovereignty resides in recent years is the EU. The UK initially joined the EC in 1973 since then the EC has become the EU and has also become increasingly more powerful over the UK as time has passed, the EU could even be argued to be supreme over UK statues and the UK parliament. This is shown in the factortame case in which EU law took precedent over UK wishes, allowing Spanish fishing boats to fish in UK waters, this was the first time UK law was scrutinized and removed by courts due to EU law contradicting these laws. Furthermore, being part of the EU ultimately is a way of binding the UK governments successors partly due to the fact that if the UK left the EU there could be major…

    • 1577 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A.V Dicey gives an introduction to the doctrine of Parliamentary sovereignty as, “the principle of Parliamentary sovereignty means neither more nor less than this, namely, that Parliament thus defined has, under the English constitution, the right to make or unmake any law whatever; and, further, that no person or body is recognised by the law of England as having the right to override or set aside the legislation of Parliament’. However, there are many discussions as to whether the UK joining with the European Union and adherence to the Human Rights Act 1998 renders sovereignty irrelevant. It will be argued that although following these rules may appear to be contradictory to sovereignty, co-operation is entirely voluntary, necessary, and there are many examples as to why sovereignty is not irrelevant, nor archaic.…

    • 793 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    With reference to case-law, and to the current situation in at least two Member States, explain and critically analyse this statement. What implications would the Member States’ reluctance to incorporate the doctrine of supremacy into their constitutional orders have for the consistency and effectiveness of EU law?…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    One strength of the UK constitution is that it is highly flexible and adaptable due to its uncodified nature, which allows constitutional arrangements to be altered in line with social and political changes. The rules of the constitution are not contained within a single document, unlike the United States’ constitution, which means that the ability to alter or remove statute laws, conventions or works of authority is far greater because no higher constitutional law is more difficult to change than ordinary law. It can evolve to meet the needs of the current times of the country and keep it from becoming dated. This is important since constitution can be changed quickly and efficiently if circumstances demand it. The relatively smooth transition of power from single part government to coalition government in 2010 shows that the constitution is flexible to cope with any form of government. The power of governments isn’t as tightly defined and limited as in countries with codified…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is important to understand the structure of the parliamentary system within which the machinery of government operates. Parliament is known as a bi-cameral legislature where by decision making autonomy resides with the lower house. The House of Commons and the House of Lords exists as a check upon the powers exerted by respective governments thou right it’s debating and ratification functions. In theory, the bi-cameral legislature in British political system exists to ensure that policy and legislation is created democratically and secondly to protect the country from autocracy or the emergence of dictatorships. Although it could be argued that both of these functions of parliament have been apparent in recent history. In this essay I aim to answer the question to what extent is parliament an effective constraint on the executive.…

    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The political landscape of the union of Scotland and England can undergo complex changes if Scotland was ever voted its independence. It can be argued that Scotland’s freedom will allow their government to have total power and control over the Scottish soil. The Scottish have the freedom of right to choose, and it may be that Scotland can be more successful on its own. The Scottish government will be capable of making choices keeping its own nation a priority. Scotland would be capable of adopting policies that benefit themselves, allowing them to maintain decent relations with the European countries (Paquin, 2002). According to the European Constitutional Law Review (2013) many laws enforced…

    • 1781 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Before evaluating whether or not Parliament is sovereign, it’s important to define what sovereignty means. Sovereignty can be split into two; political and legal. Legal sovereignty is the ultimate power to make laws which will be enforced within the state. Members of Parliament and the Prime Minister have ultimate legal power because they propose and enforce legislation. Citizens have no legal sovereignty because they don’t play a role in the legislative function even though pressure group activity may influence decisions. Political sovereignty is where real political power lies, and depending on the situation political sovereignty doesn’t always lie within Parliament. Critics have argued that due to recent changes, Parliament is no longer truly sovereign. This essay will assess the arguments for and against.…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Parliamentary system within the UK is widely regarded as one of the best, most democratic and efficient systems of government within the world. With functions such as legitimacy, representation and scrutiny being carried out on a daily basis, Parliament is the most important and powerful part of the UK political system. However, the effectiveness of Parliament in fulfilling its functions has come in to question for a number of reasons, and many people feel that the UK’s Parliament is in fact no longer successful in properly fulfilling its functions.…

    • 295 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Public Law: Proportionality

    • 2352 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Traditionally, administrative action in the UK has been subject to three grounds of review. Lord Diplock, in the GCHQ case, reiterated these and labelled them ‘procedural impropriety’, ‘illegality’ and ‘irrationality’. The test to establish whether a decision was irrational had been subject to a particularly large amount of litigation and, consequently, debate. Proportionality, a doctrine applied as a ground of review across continental Europe, necessarily grants judiciaries’ wider powers to consider the merits of a decision. The decision made must be proved to have been necessary to meet a legitimate aim, and the most reasonable way of doing so. Consequently it is a far more stringent test for irrationality than Wednesbury. Since the UK joined the European Union in 1973, judges have been required to apply the proportionality test in cases with a European dimension and increasing pressure has been placed upon the judiciary to incorporate the test into domestic administrative law.…

    • 2352 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There is an element of truth in the given statement and this essay will seek to explain UK’s Parliament today does, to a certain degree, lack democratic accountability, and this can be shown in dominance of the (i) Executive, (ii) Unrepresentative, and its (iii) Detachment from citizens.…

    • 2004 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Proportionality exists as a ground for setting aside administrative decisions in most continental legal systems and is recognised in UK cases where issues of European Community law and ECHR is involved, it seems logical that the treatment becomes the standard of substantive review in all cases.…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays