The Multiple Faces of Conflict in Organizations Author(s): Deborah M. Kolb and Linda L. Putnam Source: Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 13, No. 3, Special Issue: Conflict and Negotiation in Organizations: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives (May, 1992), pp. 311324 Published by: John Wiley & Sons Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2488478 Accessed: 23/05/2009 16:09 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=jwiley. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.
John Wiley & Sons is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Organizational Behavior.
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, VOL. 13, 311-324 (1992)
The multiple faces of conflict in organizations'
DEBORAH M. KOLB
Simmons College, U.S.A.
AND LINDA L. PUTNAM
Purdue University, U.S.A.
Conflict is a stubborn fact of organizational life. Although conflict is a familiar part of our experience in organizations, its value and centrality to organizational theory and functioning has waxed and waned; these changes have followed the changing winds of managerial ideology and social theory. Early social theorists, such as Marx and Weber, viewed group conflict as an inevitable outgrowth of social class and organization hierarchy. Threads of conflict and its management were woven into early managerial thought, particularly in the well known tenets of the 'classical' management and human relations theories (see Lewicki, Weiss and Lewin, this issue). These latter works provided the foil for what followed them because, rather than stress the inevitability and desirability of conflict, they emphasized harmony and cooperation in the workplace as desired and achievable ends. After several decades of dormancy, the theme of conflict resurfaced in the late 1960s as a major area of organizational research. Eschewing the cooperative, small group-oriented stance of earlier work, this scholarship focused on the structural sources of conflict, particularly that which occurred between various functional departments, between organized interest groups, and across different levels in an organization. Works by Pondy (1967), Walton and McKersie (1965), and Thomas (1976), among others, contributed to a changing view of conflict in organizations. No longer seen as dysfunctional, conflict was now a healthy process, but one that needed to be managed and contained through negotiation, structural adaptation and other forms of intervention. During the late 1980s and early 1990s, we are experiencing another significant turn in the development of conflict theory and practice (e.g. Kolb and Bartunek, 1992). This work suggests that the scope of conflict and its manifestation, as enacted in organizations, extends beyond previously existing models. Organizational conflicts are not always or even typically dramatic confrontations that achieve high visibility and publicity, such as strikes,...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document