Preview

Confederation Adv And Disadv Chart June

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
460 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Confederation Adv And Disadv Chart June
SS 10: Advantages and Disadvantages of Confederation (revised Cullen 2010) The Confederation Debate raged for many years in Canada. Some people called pro- Confederationists were convinced that a union of all the British North American colonies into one nation was the only sensible long-term plan. Anti-confederationists felt that remaining a British colony was a better approach, while a small group of annexationists wanted to become part of the United States. There were many pros and cons to each position, and people’s viewpoints often reflected their ethnic background, wealth, religion, and age. For this activity, you must classify the following list of factors into either a reason to support Confederation and create the country of Canada or a reason to oppose Confederation. Highlight or underline the advantages of Confederation in one of your favorite colours and mark the disadvantages in a colour you don’t like.
1. Canada East (Quebec) residents might lose their language and culture.
2. The British Navy was the most powerful in the world and would no longer be obligated to defend Canada if it gave up its colonial status.
3. An intercontinental railway would improve trade and transportation.
4. Smaller Maritime businesses wouldn’t be able to compete with larger companies from Canada West (Ontario) and Canada East (Quebec).
5. High intercolonial tariffs (import taxes) were hurting trade. These could be eliminated if the colonies united.
6. A larger, united armed forces would be better able to fend off Fenian attacks.
7. One national government would eliminate the problem of double majority, where Canada West and Canada East often disagreed on proposed legislation and would create political deadlock in the legislature.
8. Prince Edward Island had no need for a railway and but would probably have to contribute money for its construction.
9. One unified country could better defend against American manifest destiny.
10. Due to their small

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    SP15 Exam3Rev

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. (6 pts) In what 3 ways was the establishment of oversees colonies consistent with the trade goals of Mercantilism? (4 pts) Explain the trade triangles that developed between the British and the Dutch and their colonies in the New World.…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This listing of rights was very effective in attempting to sway the inhabitants of Quebec to join the colonies, as it provides illicit examples of why the colonies have a great form of government. Upon providing examples of why the colonists felt that their own government would be successful in bettering the province of Quebec, the appeal went on to provide further evidence of why Quebec should join the colonies by addressing the problems with the government that was in control of Quebec at the…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Multinationa Case Study

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1a.) How would Canada and the US be different if the US got what it claimed in 1846…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pro Conscription Dbq

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages

    • It wasn’t necessary. Canada wasn't in any threat of danger, they had already sent many soldiers, and they needed men for their own country in preparations if they ever got attacked.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The War of 1812 played a major role in shaping the thirteen colonies. The contributing…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    By now, most of you have heard that the idea of Confederation is going around the government suggested by both John A.Macdonald and George Brown. I believe that we ought to hear them out in order to save our country from falling into the hands of the Americans. The confederation is the most plausible choice at this very moment in time because there is a very high chance that the Americans will take over Canada because we support the Southern states during the Civil war. The Civil war between the Northern and Southern states was a war focused on whether or not to abolish slavery. The Southern states were against slavery, while the Northern states were for slavery. During the Civil war, Canada has supported the Southern states on not abolishing…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In contrast, there are also factors opposing Confederation, like economic would have on the Maritime Provinces. Many of the population of Canada West argued that “Confederation opens a wide field for industry, experience and and ambition.. most classes of the population will gain from the union and none that I can see, can possibly lose by the union,” (Doc 4.)as said by John MacDonald who was a politician of Canada West in a letter to Prince Edward Islands in an attempt to convince the Maritimes to…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What and why did they create a weak, confederal arrangement? Contrast and explain three important differences between the Articles of Confederation and the current US Constitution. Why do you believe the change occurred? Who were the Anti-Federalists? Who were the Federalists? Pick one contribution for each group that contributed to the development of the modern American political system.…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    that Canada as a whole would lose that part of its history. Quebec does not…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From their landing in the New World in the early 1600s, the British subjects, or colonists, were under the rule of the British King. Some colonies had more power with their own legislatures, but the British King and/or Parliament always had the final rule. Some of the British Kings tended to be more lenient than others, but when the Restoration occurred in 1660, Charles II was restored to power in England and he planned on ruling with a complete monarchy. This would cause further conflict between the colonies and England and eventually in the 1700s, a Revolution. Through this revolution, since the colonies weren't going to be ruled by England, a new, central government had to be drawn up. This new government, however, couldn't be too powerful due to the Americans' fear of tyranny. The Articles of Confederation was the perfect government system for the 11 years that it held America together for. It was too weak, however, to last any longer than that. During the time of Revolution, the Articles of Confederation was the right form of central government for America, but its weaknesses in state control led to its rejection and the creation of the U.S. Constitution because they didn't allow the federal government to control taxation and they were too weak. The Articles of Confederation was satisfying in its' role as the central government in America during the Revolution because it held the states together and it signed the Peace Treaty of Paris, which ended the Revolutionary War. The Articles of Confederation was too weak, however, due to the fact that there was no hard currency and unruly state taxation which caused a group of farmers led by Daniel Shay to rebel against it. This rebellion, deemed Shay's Rebellion, led to the passage of the U.S. Constitution.…

    • 1149 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    My main reason for not joining Confederation is losing our French culture. Do you really want Canada West and Maritime (English Speaking Canadians) provinces to take over our French Culture??? If we join Confederation all of our French Rights would be lost, The Roman Catholic and everything else will be lost. The English Speaking Canadians will slowly take over our culture and our province. Soon it will be gone, Even the French speaking Canadians. Even if their was a Federal government to preserve our culture it would not be any good .The Central government Would be too strong for us and take our culture away from us. If we made French our second (2) main language. It would not be any good everyone would speak French, But Only…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Loyalist debate

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The colonies aren’t prepared to fight a war against the most powerful navy in the world and a massive redcoat army (EK)…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I strongly believe the Canadian Confederation was not bound to happen because if certain issues from the past were dealt differently, the outcome would surely differ from today. First of all if the British hadn't changed their attitude towards the colonies, or in other words they still believed the colonies could incessantly bring wealth to their homes in Great Britain, they would unquestionably oppose the idea of Confederation. Who would want wealth to cease? Since the colonies held their fidelity towards Britain, no further action would be done. Canada would continue to remain as a colony of the vast British Empire. Secondly, the colonies could have decided not to build a railway at all due to the heavy expenses involved. Subsequently, the colonies wouldn't need to merge as a country to share the expenses to prevent bankruptcy. In addition, troops and provisions could not be conveyed between British Columbia and Eastern Canada efficiently without a railway. This in turn will leave the colonies exposed to invasions and attacks from the United States. Manifest Destiny, or in other words the belief that the United States would sooner or later take control of the entire continent might take place. Confederation then, will not be very possible. Finally if no difficulties in trade were encountered, it was extremely unlikely that the British North American colonies would unite. For instance, suppose Britain did not initiate a free trade system in 1846. This would mean that the colonies would always have a guaranteed trading partner, providing them with a stable economy. Taking this into consideration, establishing a free trade amongst themselves would be unnecessary. Therefore, the whole concept of Confederation would be quite pointless, since one of the reasons of Confederation was that the colonies thought forming one country would help expedite their free trade system. The same scheme would apply if the United States didn't terminate…

    • 370 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    TO IMPROVE RAIL TRAVEL CANADA WOULD NEED TO DEVELOP A HIGH-SPEED TRAIN SO THAT TRAVEL BY TRAIN WOULD BE MUCH MORE EFFICIENT AND FASTER. THIS WOULD BE DIFFICULT TO DO BECAUSE THE DEVELOPMENT OF A HIGH-SPEED TRAIN WOULD BE VERY COSTLY.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    3. The current practice of government (in Canada) is significantly different from what the model require {it is not practical}…

    • 2093 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays