Preview

Computers

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1708 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Computers
Computers and Society
Evaluating the Impact of Technology
Chris Brooks Department of Computer Science University of San Francisco

Evaluating Technological Impact
It can be useful to think about the ways in which technology impacts the way we live our lives. Most computer scientists have a pretty positive view of technology. Is that view justified? How do we defend that view to other, more skeptical points of view?

Department of Computer Science — University of San Francisco – p.1/?

Research and scholarship on the Web
Having so much information available on the Web is a double-edged sword. What are some advantages to having the Web as a research tool? What are some disadvantages? What can be done to help address these disadvantages?

Department of Computer Science — University of San Francisco – p.2/?

Research and scholarship on the Web
Research challenges: Google ranks pages by popularity, not correctness There is no external editorial control or means to challenge incorrect information. Authors may have a hidden agenda or motives.

Department of Computer Science — University of San Francisco – p.3/?

Wikipedia
Wikipedia is the best example of the challenges these issues present. Wikipedia has over 15 times as many words as Encyclopedia Brittanica. Vast coverage of a wide variety of issues. Worldwide group of contributors and editors providing expertise.

Department of Computer Science — University of San Francisco – p.4/?

Advantages of Wikipedia
What advantages does the Wikipedia approach provide?

Department of Computer Science — University of San Francisco – p.5/?

Advantages of Wikipedia
What advantages does the Wikipedia approach provide? “Wisdom of crowds” Able to solicit articles on a much wider array of topics. Fast editing and updating Democratizes choice of topic and content.

Department of Computer Science — University of San Francisco – p.6/?

Disadvantages of Wikipedia
What disadvantages does the Wikipedia

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The author’s purpose is to testify about his experience with Wikipedia and persuade the intended audience that Wikipedia is not a credible or…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The main concerns I have while conducting research, is knowing if the information is accurate for one, and does it really help me in my writing. With sites like Wikipedia, you have to assume they are not the only sites of their nature. While a lot of their information is correct, it may not be accurate or properly cited or documented. Others have to be doing the same thing, like urban dictionary among others. It makes me nervous unless I am on a .org or .gov website. Knowing if the information is truly helping my case, instead of hurting me is the other concern. Things can be taken out of context very easily, and either I, or the reader could mis-understand where I was going with something.…

    • 255 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jimmy wales

    • 561 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Main point A: Wikipedia was only a simple dream of Jimmy Wales, to build a “growing-content” encyclopedia. (Jimmy Wales, n.d.)…

    • 561 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    computers

    • 1169 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Summarize the case study, being sure to describe the underlying problem(s) of the collapse of the system…

    • 1169 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ldr/531

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Wikipedia is one of the most sought out information website. Jimmy Wales, founder says this about his website, “Wikipedia is something special…, it is a place we can all go to think, to learn and share our knowledge with others” (Wikipedia, 2012, p1). This resourceful tool has up-to-date news, press releases, and it provides its users with the convenience to various languages. In this paper team C will debate on supporting arguments for Wikipedia and opposing arguments if it is credible and a valid source of information.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Wikipedia is known as an unreliable site due to numerous amount of editorial adjustments on each article by unknown editors that may contain errors. The articles should not be used to make critical decisions, because you don’t know who wrote the information, and the source of the data could be false. Individuals can create malicious entries, and people with agendas have significant editing authority which make the site untrustworthy.…

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wikipedia does not have an apocalyptic view about this because its core audience knows the site very well and it has all the necessary experience to get exactly what they want. The loyal users use internal searches or they head directly to the page they want to see. This somehow works like in the case of the top affiliate networks. People know what they want and where they should go to find it.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Inf 103

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Wikipedia has been a successful source of information.Wikipedia does have a wealth of knowledge. I have used it a lot to find facts about different people, places, and books. It is a convenient way to look up information. It is a temporary solution to research. However when you are doing research Wikipedia is not a credible source nor is it recommended by professors. Anyone can post material on Wikipedia as stated in the disclaimer. So this information does not necessarily have to be the most accurate. This information could be old the facts may not…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wikipedia can be beneficial to the academic student as well as the general researching public. Wikipedia covers an immense variety of topics that is continually maintained and updated, relevant, and non-biased in its presentation of information. Wikipedia possess all the qualities a reliable source would have. Wikipedia’s premise is promoting involvement of the general public for inputting information and continually adding into a comprehensive knowledge base.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philip Lau, writer of the essay, “The Limitations of Wikipedia”, is successful in persuading his readers that the webpage Wikipedia should not be used for college level research. In his essay, Philip states that, “Wikipedia can be a beneficial starting point in gaining general information on a subject but users should be wary of incorrect information”. The essayist’s use of examples, facts and quotes are what makes his argument so convincing.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Mark Wilson’s article “Professors Should Embrace Wikipedia”, Wilson argues that despite the legitimacy of Wikipedia, educators should engage and take part in helping shape the direction of Wikipedia. In a test published in the journal “Nature”, articles in Wikipedia are said to be as revered as those in the “Encyclopedia Britannica.” Since the perceived lack of academic authority, Wilson suggests that those with research specialties should enroll as editors of Wikipedia to add, control, and learn from the information being provided. Wilson describes his own interaction with Wikipedia and how he, his students, and other colleagues have benefitted from the use of it. From becoming a Wikipedia editor and a collaborator with other colleagues, Wilson has “in turn taught some people how to properly reference ideas and information.” Wilson expresses his ideas to involve scholars with Wikipedia to make it more useful to students and the public. Wilson argues that Wikipedia is a source that although warned from, students will go to anyway to start projects, look up terms, and go for general information. If Wikipedia is “the largest coherent store of information and ideas” as stated by Wilson, then “teacher and scholars should have been on this train years ago for the benefit of our students and professions.”…

    • 885 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was interesting to learn their findings in which they found “eight serious errors” in which four came for Wikipedia and four came from Britannica. They also found 162 factual and misleading errors in Wikipedia while only finding 123 in Britannica. Articles chosen for the study varied in subject and were review by field experts; they were not told who wrote the articles. Wales founder of Wikipedia was asked what he thought of these findings and he was pleased with the findings and stated that the “error rate for each encyclopedia was not insignificant, and added that he thinks such numbers demonstrate that broad review of encyclopedia articles is needed” (Terdiman, 2005). The importance of this article was to show that even in a controlled setting there is room for error.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is Wikipedia an Acceptable Source for Academic Writing? Wikipedia is the ultimate source for information. It has articles on nearly every topic and has millions of editors around the world.…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The internet, as Carr agrees, is a time-saving tool. Carr says: “Research that once required days in the stacks or periodical rooms of libraries can now be done in minutes.” In today’s world, people simply do not have the time to spend hours or maybe even days in a library sifting through mountains of books and articles to find a single piece of information that is actually pertinent to what they are searching for if they can even find it. What Google does is grant universal access to thousands of resources including books, articles, encyclopedias, and hundreds of other types of media at the click of a mouse. The ability to access such a vast amount of information in such a prompt manner provides us with the time to discover even more information and deepen our knowledge of the subject much further that what could simply be a line or two in a book.…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Credible sources are always a topic for debate. What is a credible source and what is not a credible source. By definition, credible means “offering reasonable grounds for being believed.” ("Merriam-Webster", 2011) Therefore a credible source is information that is true and believable. One of the sources that we discussed and debated in class is Wikipedia. “Wikipedia is an online open-content collaborative encyclopedia.......” "Wikipedia:general Disclaimer" (2011) So what about Wikipedia does or does not make it a credible source. Below I will discuss the debate outcomes, the arguments between both sides, and my reasoning for choosing the against side.…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays