Axia College Material
Critical Analysis Forms
Fill out one form for each source.
Source 1 Title and Citation: A U.S. Invasion of Iraq Is Not Justified| Zunes, Stephen. "A U.S. Invasion of Iraq Is Not Justified." The Nation 275 (30 Sept. 2002): 11. Rpt. in Is Military Action Justified Against Nations Thought to Support Terrorism? Ed. James D. Torr. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2003. At Issue. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 20 Mar. 2011. Document URLhttp://ic.galegroup.com.ezproxy.apollolibrary.com/ic/ovic/ViewpointsDetailsPage/ViewpointsDetailsWindow?displayGroupName=Viewpoints&prodId=OVIC&action=e&windowstate=normal&catId=&documentId=GALE%7CEJ3010261209&mode=view&userGroupName=uphoenix&jsid=b56e702e2866e31bd860910b9fe6452c|
1| Identify the principal issue presented by the source.| The principal issue presented by this source is that the United States is not justified in invading Iraq.| 2| Identify any examples of bias presented by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this.| There were no examples of bias presented by the author. Following the eight principle arguments stated by author Stephen Zunes, a rebuttal is given. | 3| Identify any areas that are vague or ambiguous. If none exist, explain how you determined this.| The statement “Iraq’s armed forces are barely one-third their pre-Gulf War strength.” is vague. There is no way to measure the exact strength of the Iraqi armed forces in 2003 because the pre-Gulf War strength is not disclosed. | 4| Do you find the source credible? Explain your reasoning.| I find the source credible. Preceding the article it stated that “Stephen Zunes is an associate professor of politics at the University of San Francisco, Middle East editor of the Foreign Policy in Focus website (www.fpif.org), and the author of Tinder Box: U.S. Middle East Policy and...