Preview

Comparison of King Lear and Gloucester

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
865 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparison of King Lear and Gloucester
English IV

January 31, 2012

"Love, and be silent"

As one of Shakespeare 's most famous tragedies, the story of King Lear reflects the two extremes of human nature--love and loyalty, lies and betrayal. In such a complex world, Shakespeare ironically contrasts the physical qualities to the deeper meanings of blindness and sight throughout the tragic lives of the King and Gloucester. Their lack of insight cause their hearts to be blinded by their aberrant understandings of love and trust at the early stages where they can still physically see; but it is also such blindness that helps King Lear and Gloucester to find their clear visions back to determine the reality after deep self-realizations when the blindness reaches to its extreme.

Both being fathers and noble men, King Lear and Gloucester are fooled by the flattering words which they are used to and banish the children who devote true love to them. It is unfair to say that they do not love those children, but their wrong social values caused by their special social status have developed a false understanding of real love and loyalty within their minds. As Lear says in front of all his people, "[he] loves [Cordelia] most and thought to set [his] rest/ On her kind nursery" (1.1.124-25), but when his pride takes over his senses, such strong love turns out to be exceeding expectations of apparent and inane flattery from Cordelia. Physically being able to see all the praises and loyalties people has devoted to him, Lear yet has been truly blinded in heart by his lack of insight. Living in his own world which full of lies and pretenses, the King loses his clear vision to determine what the reality is. Also misjudging the truth, Gloucester shows his weakness from believing in Edmund, the bastard, so easily without even sufficient evidence. As an adulterer, he must not understand what love is, for not caring about Edmund 's feelings by introducing Edmund is the bastard in front of Kent, and for saying he "so tenderly



Cited: Shakespeare, William, Tucker Brooke, and William Lyon Phelps. _The Tragedy of King Lear_. New Haven: Yale UP, 1947. Print.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Cited: “King Lear.” The Norton Anthology of English Literature. 8th ed. Ed. David Alfred and James…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    King Lear's Dementia

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Cited: Shakespeare, William, and Russell A. Fraser. The Tragedy of King Lear. New York: New American Library, 1986. Print.…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    I find it quite ironic how Gloucester finally ‘sees’ and understands his world until he loses his vision. I believe Shakespeare most likely did this to create tension. As a reader, I find it truly amazing how Shakespeare made Gloucester ‘mentally’ blind by not realizing his son’s loyalties by then making him physically blind and making him ‘see,’ ironically, how Edmund had deceived him. I also found it quite ironic how King Lear decides to divide the land between Goneril and Regan and refuses to share the land with the only daughter who truly loves him, Cordelia. I believe King Lear let his pride get to him by not thinking about the consequences. It is safe to say the theme of this play is the inability to see things for what they are. As the story progresses the reader gets to see how King Lear’s stubbornness gets him absolutely nowhere. He had no reason to accuse Cordelia for being ‘unfaithful’. After all, she was the only one who truly loved him. It is also ironic how King Lear banished Kent, his most loyal servant for saying things for what they were for. As a good ‘friend’ Kent decided to let Lear know that what he did was wrong and unnecessary. Because of this Lear’s pride was hurt and this caused him to make irrational…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the world of King Lear, being a shakespearean tragedy, suffering, loss, and injustice are all factors often expected before an audience enters the bottomless pit of complicated characters, varying agendas, and Shakespearean english these productions usually employed. However, despite its melancholy undertone and lack of warmer lighting gels on stage, King Lear is not without hope.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    He asks Lear to rethink his decision, calling it rash,, and that Cordelia does not love him the least. This ends poorly for Kent, as he is then banished from the kingdom, while Cordelia, although she is now disowned, still marries the King of France, and goes to live with him. Lear’s decision to disown Cordelia turns out to be a horrible one, as she was the only one truthful about her love to her father. Without Cordelia, Lear is forced to live with one of Goneril or Regan. However, both Goneril and Regan are plotting against Lear, and end up leaving him stripped of his power and integrity. Cordelia was the only to be honest, and although it is generally a good trait to have, her honesty towards Lear is what causes her to be disowned. This shows Albany’s quote, as the family was fine before, but when Lear was “striving to better,” he made what he already had worse.…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    King Lear

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages

    William Shakespeare’s tragic works are notably characterized by the hamartia of their protagonists. This tragic flaw is a defect in character that brings about an error in action, eventually leading to the characters imminent downfall. In Shakespeare’s King Lear, written in 1606, the King’s hamartia proves to be his extreme rashness, which results in the loss of most everything that he holds dear, including his authority, his affluence and his family. The reasons for his downfall lie within the flaws of his own character, made evident by his insatiable need for flattery and his egotistical fixations.…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Play writers and authors commonly use blindness to symbolize ignorance or the refusal to see the truth, and Shakespeare was no exception. In King Lear, Shakespeare brilliantly uses the blindness of characters to symbolize ignorance. In the play, there are two main characters among the main plot and the subplot; Gloucester and King Lear. Both Gloucester and Lear lead troubling lives, one is a narcissistic king, and the other a bad father, which blinds them to the truth because they somewhat neglect the feelings of others. Eventually, their children simultaneously think of plans to betray their fathers; Lear’s daughters, Regan and Goneril, hope to kick him out of his kingdom and Gloucester’s son, Edmund, attempts to trick him into killing his…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The character of King Lear possesses the fatal flaw of hubris. He is arrogant, self-absorbed, an imperious king who is unbelievably unrealistic. Especially in the division of his kingdom, his title always came first and he had little or no understanding of what it meant to be a father or to love as can be seen in Act One nothing will come of nothing. Speak again. Hence Lears suffering from Act Three onwards is a large part of his journey…

    • 1443 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Anger and Shakespeare

    • 3375 Words
    • 13 Pages

    New York U P, 1964. 2. Bradley, A. C. Shakespearean Tragedy: Lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, Macbeth. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan, 1905.…

    • 3375 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the play King Lear, both Lear and Gloucester come to realise the mistakes they have made after faced with adversity.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Lear

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages

    William Shakespeare’s King Lear is a timeless play whose textual integrity lends itself to a variety of interpretations and in exploring the human condition the text remains relevant across a wide range of contexts. It is possible to present the text as exploring and affirming the human condition, where humanity is defined as the ability to love and empathise. However, in the same instance, a nihilist perspective, such as Peter Brooke’s 1971 production of King Lear, challenges this by outlining that humanity as an imaginary ideal.…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Isu Journals

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It is evident that several characters throughout the text King Lear written by William Shakespeare move from blindness to a clearer perception. It has been said that King Lear is about a tragedy of “man going sane.” In Shakespearean terms, blind has a different meaning than modern English. Blindness is normally defined as the inability of the eye to see, but according to Shakespeare, blindness is not a physical quality, but a mental quality some people possess as well. Shakespeare’s most dominant theme in his play King Lear is that of blindness. King Lear and Gloucester are two prime examples Shakespeare incorporates this theme into. Each of these character’s blindness was the primary cause of the bad decisions they made; decisions which all of them would eventually come to regret.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    King Lear is a tragedy written by William Shakespeare in the Jacobean period after King James I of England came to the throne. Tragedies, which centre around dysfunctional families or couples such as Euripides’ Medea, focus on human suffering and require a high status protagonist to make a tragic mistake due to a flaw in his character which makes him human. King Lear’s tragic character flaw is arrogance and in some ways gullibility as he believes his daughters, Regan and Goneril, when they flatter him to gain a share of the kingdom. The key element for tragedies is the protagonist has to die shortly after recognising his error. It is typical for the audience to cry, giving them a cathartic experience.…

    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    <br>Lear's feelings in this passage parallel the disorder of the storm. To bring order to the universe, Lear must start by bringing order to himself. This occurs when he becomes lawful and puts his daughters on trial. Soon after, Lear says, "When the rain came to wet me once and the wind to / make me chatter, when the thunder would not peace / at my bidding, there I found ‘em, there I smelt ‘em out" (4, vi, 100-102). Here, Lear explains how the "storm" actually helped him "see" the truth. Soon after this event occurs,…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    King Lear Play vs. Movie

    • 1862 Words
    • 8 Pages

    King Lear by William Shakespeare tells the tragedy of Lear, King of England, who slowly, throughout the course of the play becomes mad and eventually dies. There have been many film adaptations of the play all of which try and remain as close to the original play; however, none appear to keep the same meaning of Shakespeare’s text more than director Richard Eyre’s film version of King Lear (1997). Shakespeare focuses in on each character’s flaws and their contributions to the consequences at the end of the play and although Eyre does the same in his film, he adds minor actions and scenes to the play to give characters of the play a light that emphasizes their nature.…

    • 1862 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays