Comparing Truth In Arthur And The Ceo's Story Of King Arthur

Legends are stories that are not always true but stem from some truth. Their conflicts and solutions may not be placed in the same context every time, but their ambiguous messages cause them to be revered as classics throughout the ages. Although Arthur’s tale has not been proven factual, real or not real, it still contains universal truths that can apply to many facets of modern day life. Through the author’s use of setting, the point is significantly furthered in the text provided.
Arthur and the CEO’s stories may have been played out in different locations and time periods, but Arthur’s overarching message still holds truth in both works of literature. Author’s story took place in the mythical land of Camelot (which some believed to be an allusion to England), in the 5th century. He struggles with uniting a kingdom, protecting that kingdom, and finding the ever elusive, mythical Holy Grail. The Holy Grail is said to be the cup that Jesus drank from at The Last Supper and it imbues immortality to any who drink from it . The CEO, on the other hand, is dealing with modern day struggles. In a constantly advancing, technological age of history, CEO’s are constantly fighting to remain on top in their field of business. CEO’s must collect a team of highly skilled professionals, who will ensure the success of the company. In addition, they must be proactive when dealing with issues and can not ignore issues due to its difficulty or complexity. Balzac states that “when you strip away the scenery [Arthur’s and the
However, when looking at the roots of both texts it is easy to see the similarities between them. Resemblances in conflicts, solutions, and central themes are made clear through the removal of the more individualized details, such as setting. Ultimately, even the wildest, most unrealistic tales of history will contain some axiom that can mirrors issues, even of today’s