Preview

Comparing Political Philosophies

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
606 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing Political Philosophies
Comparing Political Philosophy Theories

PHI/105
04/26/2013
Daniel Chadwick
Comparing Political Philosophy Theories
Write a 350- to 500-word paper describing three of the following political philosophy theories:

Social contract or contractarian (use at least two philosophers in your description)
Classic liberalism or libertarianism (use at least two philosophers in your description)
Marxism (use at least one philosopher in your description)
Communitarians (use at least one philosopher in your description)
Capabilities approach (use at least one philosopher in your description)

Follow your descriptions with a conclusion answering the following questions:

How are these theories similar to one another?
How are they different from one another?
Do you find one philosophy more compelling than the others? If so, why?

Contractarianism The social contract or political contract is a theory or model, originating during the Age of Enlightenment, that typically addresses the questions of the origin of society and the legitimacy of the authority of the state over the individual. Social contract arguments typically posit that individuals have consented, either explicitly or tacitly, to surrender some of their freedoms and submit to the authority of the ruler or magistrate (or to the decision of a majority), in exchange for protection of their remaining rights. The question of the relation between natural and legal rights, therefore, is often an aspect of social contract theory.The most important contemporary political social contract theorist is John Rawls, who effectively resurrected social contract theory in the second half of the 20th century, along with David Gauthier, who is primarily a moral contractarian.
Marxism
Under Marxism, outdated class structures were supposed to be overthrown with force instead of being replaced through patient modification. It held that as capitalism has succeeded feudalism, it too will be removed by a



References: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_contract http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_liberalism http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/Marxism.html Philosophy: The Power of Ideas (8th ed.) (Moore and Bruder)

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx believed that society is based upon a conflict between Bourgeoisies (Ruling class, Upper class) and Proletariat (Working class). Marx believed that the ruling class were exploiting the working class.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    hobbes and kant

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The first humans on earth were primative clans that stuck together. As time developed so did the mind of the human. As the minds of humans started to expand, society developed and so did its many other aspects. One of those aspects is the social contract. A social contract are theories that try to explain the ways in which people form states and/or maintain social order. The notion of the social contract implies that the people give up some rights to a government or other authority in order to receive or maintain social order through the rule of law. It can also be thought of as an agreement by the governed on a set of rules by which they are governed. Two theorists that had very strong views on the social contract were Thomas Hobbes and Immanuel Kant. Although both of these theorists believed in a social contract they both had different views on what it exactly meant.…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marxism is a useful conflict theory in helping us to understand why there was obedience, particularly in the past in society. Marx saw negativity within the economy; he believed that the functioning and running of society was based upon the economy. Because of this, Marx states why there is a divide between the proletariat (working class who have only their skills to sell) and the bourgeoisie (the ruling class who own the means of production). The bourgeoisie cannot operate without the proletariat, as they cannot produce products, and similarly the proletariat cannot operate without the bourgeoisie, as they need them so they can be paid a wage and feed their families. On the other hand, this can be viewed from a different perspective. However it can be argued that these people may have not left their jobs is because they could have been in a state of false consciousness, whereby they were unaware of their exploitation by the bourgeoisie. This helps us to understand society as the Marxism theory provides reasoning on how the bourgeoisie were able to exploit the proletariat, which in turn powered capitalism and allowed the ruling elite to maintain their profits. It is also relevant to today’s society, as it helps to explain why many people who are in a low paid job (e.g. Factory workers) do not leave, despite hating their job, and this is because they need the money to survive. On the other hand radical social change would be inevitable according to Marx, society would enter a final period- communism. However this can be criticized as capitalism has only…

    • 881 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marxism is an ideology based on the economic and political theories of Karl Marx and Freidrich Engels. Karl Marx who was born in Germany in 1818 was a revolutionary whose ideas on society were the foundation of communism. Under modern capitalism the means of production, such as factories, land, and technology are controlled by a small minority who Marx called the bourgeoisie. Production is carried out by the working class, known as the proletarians who have to sell their labour or face poverty or starvation. Taken together these two classes form the economic base of society, what Marx called the substructure. Marx saw that there was conflict between these two divisions and that this could only be resolved by a revolution, which would lead to a classless society, where the means of production would be held collectively. All Marx’s theories use social class as a starting point for analysis. In this essay we will explore two areas where Marx’s theories have had influence, crime and deviance and education. Marx saw the bourgeoisie as controlling these institutions. Marxists believe that these institutions form part of the superstructure of society with the economy as its base.…

    • 1931 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A social contract is a political philosophy which claims that the government and people are bound under a contract. The government is supposed to protect the people's rights and, in return, the people allow the government to rule. The theory had a huge impact on the ideals of the Founding Fathers, especially Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. This can be observed in the Declaration of Independence when it is written: “[T]hat to secure these rights, Government are are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent governed...” It is clearly a direct interpretation of Locke’s understanding of the social contract theory.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: Moore, B. N., & Bruder, K. (2011) Philosophy: The power of ideas. (8th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marxists therefore believe that political power reflects class interests and that the state is a bourgeois state that is based on the capital. Reasons in which there is a need for a overthrow of the bourgeois state by political revolution is because Revolutionary Socialists understand that change by political reform and gradual change which is supported by evolutionary socialist are clearly misleading as the ideas of universal suffrage and regular and competitive elections are simply a disguise of the actual reality of unequal classes and to mislead the political energies of the working class. Hence the need for the class-conscious proletariat to…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Social Contract Theory

    • 10806 Words
    • 44 Pages

    Social contract theory, nearly as old as philosophy itself, is the view that persons’ moral and/or political obligations are dependent upon a contract or agreement among them to form the society in which they live. Socrates uses something quite like a social contract argument to explain to Crito why he must remain in prison and accept the death penalty. However, social contract theory is rightly associated with modern moral and political theory and is given its first full exposition and defense by Thomas Hobbes. After Hobbes, John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau are the best known proponents of this enormously influential theory, which has been one of the most dominant theories within moral and political theory throughout the history of the modern West. In the twentieth century, moral and political theory regained philosophical momentum as a result of John Rawls’ Kantian version of social contract theory, and was followed by new analyses of the subject by David Gauthier and others. More recently, philosophers from different perspectives have offered new criticisms of social contract theory. In particular, feminists and race-conscious philosophers have argued that social contract theory is at least an incomplete picture of our moral and political lives, and may in fact camouflage some of the ways in which the contract is itself parasitical upon the subjugations of classes of persons.…

    • 10806 Words
    • 44 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Flaws of Marxism

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages

    At the turn of the 19th century, an unprecedented amount of change had because of the Industrial Revolution. The concept of slavery in its typical terms had been abolished. Society itself had drastically changed. The population had more than doubled in Europe. Due to the Enlightenment era, philosophers had reduced God to a realm that does not describe the way our world works, and rationalism had taken its place. The dynamic between the peasant and the landowner had transitioned to the worker and the factory owner. Some of the same abuses continued to occur. Wealth and money, because of the system known as capitalism, became the means of all work. Realism had taken the place of the romantic, idealist philosophers, and the more contemporary philosophers of the 18th and 19th century defined the way our world operates through the realities in which they perceived. One philosopher in particular, Karl Marx, saw the system of capitalism as the root of evil in our world and as a hindrance of individual life and creativity. Although humans are producers, and capitalism is created through the production of labor for wealth. In our period of history, capitalism has alienated the human being. Although he rejected idealism, Marx, ironically, created an ideology that can only realistically exist in theory and not in true practice. Marx’s ideology is, and during his time in history, implausible because of the nature of human beings. Marxism is inherently flawed because of an imaginary struggle he views as inevitable, which in actuality is avoidable. In order for one to see the implausibility of Marx’s ideology, we must examine certain aspects of Marxism to note its problem areas.…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 1800s arranged the foundation for today 's world and witnessed the growth of big business, government development, advancement of new technologies and formation of novel philosophies about social order. Karl Marx, a German philosopher and politician made it his life’s work to logically understand capitalism and nurture revolutionary groups during this industrializing period. The idea of capitalism is one where there is private ownership over any product or service. Marx and socialists of the time criticized the new industrial order for dividing society into the new middle class, capitalists who owned all the wealth and the working class who lived in poverty. Marx was a proponent of industrialization for the reason that he assumed it would ultimately bring on the proletarian revolution and certainly instigate the abolition of exploitation, private property, and class society. According to Marx, communists must aim for the “downfall of the bourgeoisie (capitalist class) and the ascendancy of the proletariat (working class), the abolition of the old society based on class conflicts and the foundation of a new society without classes and without private ownership” (Hunt, Martin, Barbara, & Smith, 2010).…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Research and Theories

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The first thing I am going to do is give a generalization of the four types of theories that I have provided. The reason for this is so that there can be a basic understanding of each type.…

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Founded by Karl Marx, Marxism is a school of thought which explores the relationship between the upper and lower classes of society. It was taught through Marxism that the main cause for historical change was disputes between social classes. This social warfare stemmed from the belief that the state, or government, for as long as it has existed, has used its authority to oppress the working masses for the benefit of the wealthy few. The relationship between the proletariats, the working class, and the bourgeoisie, the rich, was posited as one of opposition and conflict. Marx believed that a successful capitalist-run society was impossible and doomed to fail.…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Week 1 Sociology Notes

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Karl Marx’s class conflict theory states that the bourgeoisie (or the capitalists) are locked in conflict with the proletariat (the exploited workers). Marx believed that this conflict could only end when the working class united and violently broke free of the “bondage”. Once this happens, society will be classless and people will work according to their abilities, while receiving goods and services according to their needs. Although Marxism does propose revolution, it should not be confused with communism.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marxism is a theory which sees all society’s institutions as helping to maintain class inequality and capitalism…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Social contract theory is a theory first talked about by Thomas Hobbes and John Locke and then other philosophers such as Rousseau, Paine, and Hume; it is a theory suggesting that without state there is the state of nature, which is essentially the state of anarchy and consent is made by individuals to create a state as a ‘necessary evil’ as Tomas Paine describes the state. There are two points of disagreement in relation to the state. One is the nature of the state- whether it should be coercive or not, whether it is necessary; the other is the state's purpose - whether the state should just provide negative freedoms, or whether it should offer some king of welfare.…

    • 1989 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics