Compare Missouri Compromise And The Circumstantial Panic Of 1819

The Missouri Compromise was written in the year of 1820 on March 3rd and was also passed on the same day. This compromise approved Missouri to come to America as a slave state, but conserved the correspondence between the North and the South by modeling the land of Maine out of Massachusetts and stopping slavery from territories accomplished in the Louisiana Purchase which is the north of the line of 36 30’ and this is the southern boundary of Missouri. The South and the North was not satisfied with the Missouri Compromise because many southern congressmen balloted to oppose the compromise. They opposed it because the limit on future slavery in the territories was not excessively abusive to the slave owners. It was abusive to them because the
The Missouri Compromise and the circumstantial panic of 1819 should have darkened the constitutional figure in that time period which was President Monroe, but it did not. These bitter events had a discouraging result on the Era of Good Feelings. This caused President Monroe to collect all of the electoral votes except for one in the presidential election of 180. He was the only president to be reelected after one term of being president in which the main business panic began. The Era of Good Feelings was not completely peaceful and also the panic of 1819 and the Missouri Compromise. The lawmaking argument on the Missouri Compromise had awakened those tensions and they were later provoked by a stop of a slave rebellion in Charleston in 1822. All in all, the Missouri Compromise claimed that the majority of the western territories obtained in the Louisiana Purchase were always closed to slavery in the north of the state of Missouri. Senator Stephen A. Douglas’s Kansas-Nebraska scheme absolutely challenged the Missouri Compromise, which had banned slavery in the arranged Nebraska Territory north of the protected 36 30’