Preview

Compare and contrast the Sophists and S

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
781 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare and contrast the Sophists and S
Kelsey Fenech Spiteri
Compare and contrast the Sophists and Socrates’ moral position.
The Sophists were public speakers, mouths for hire in an oral culture. They were gifted with speech. They were skilled in what is known as Rhetoric. They were respected, feared and hated at the same time. They had a gift and used it in a manner that aroused the ire of many. They challenged, questioned and did not care to arrive at the very best answers.
They cared about winning public speaking contests, debates, and lawsuits and in charging fees to teach others how to do as they did. To be able to speak well meant a great deal at that time. As there was no real paper available, (there was nothing written which could be used as evidence back then) they would need to settle any arguments through a contest of words: one person's words against another's. Whoever presented the best oral case would often win. To speak well was very important. The Sophists were very good speakers. Indeed, they had reputations for being able to convince a crowd that up was down, that day was night, that the wrong answer could be the right answer, that good was bad and bad is good, even that injustice is justice and justice would be made to appear as injustice!
The Sophists taught others how to; win no matter how bad your case is/win friends and influence people/succeed in business without really trying/succeed in life/play to win .
The Sophists held no values other than winning and succeeding. They were not true believers. They were atheists, relativists and cynical about religious beliefs and all traditions. They believed and taught that "might makes right". They put their trust in whatever works to bring about the desired end at whatever the cost. They made a business of education and profited from it.
Their concerns were not with truth but with practical knowledge. They practiced rhetoric in order to persuade and not to discover truth. Their art was to persuade the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Salem Witch Trials

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages

    They believed that the Holy Bible was the law, wanting to purify culture. Arbella Conventant in 1630 once stated in a sermon speaking to the puritan society, “For we must consider that we shall be as a city upon a hill, the eyes of all people upon us. “…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first chapter introduced the reader to the art of rhetoric. He describes how rhetoric works through real life examples. He demonstrates ways that rhetoric persuades us like, argument from strength, and seduction. He tells the reader that the sole purpose of arguing is to persuade the audience. He showed that the chief purpose of arguing is to also achieve consensus, a shared faith in a choice.…

    • 2276 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antigone - 13

    • 1735 Words
    • 7 Pages

    focused on more than the Gods or heavenly concerns. As a result many new ideals and beliefs…

    • 1735 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Apology by Plato

    • 2058 Words
    • 9 Pages

    For the majority of his life, Socrates spent a good deal of his time asking questions of the people of Athens. His goal was to arrive at a set of political and ethical truths. Contrary to many people at the time, Socrates did not lecture about the things he knew; he actually claimed to be rather ignorant. He claimed he was wise only because he recognized his ignorance and did not claim to know what he did not know (Grube 26). The questions Socrates asked forced his audiences to think through a problem and arrive at a logical conclusion. At times, the answers seemed so obvious his opponents often looked foolish. His “Socratic Method” of questioning as it came to be called later, was adored by Socrates’ followers but despised by others throughout Athens (“Socrates Biography.”).…

    • 2058 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dialectic Vs Rhetoric

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Page

    One more prominent figure in the classical history of rhetoric is Plato (428-347 B.C). Plato believed that the purpose of philosophy was to discover truth that should be independent of any special calculation of interest; he was suspicious of rhetoric because he thought it lacked any concern with a truth that was separate from the speaker’s interest. An opposition therefore developed in the classical period between rhetoric and dialectic (1), dialectic gave equal weight to both sides of an argument, while rhetoric was concerned with persuasion from a particular perspective rather than presenting a balanced point of view. For Plato, rhetoric was deceptive, because it only showed a perspective that fitted with the speaker’s point of view.…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Acting on Emotion

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Sophocles designs his plays to instruct his audience members to behave morally correct. People’s actions are ruled by their emotions (jealousy, suspicion, anger, pride, and love) and it leads to negative effects for them. But when acting in a sage demeanor, it gives evidence to a person’s character. Sophocles writes his characters to be ruled by their emotions and to teach people to behave in a prudent demeanor. Sophocles designs his plays to have the people of authority act in an immorally correct fashion.…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato’s Gorgias

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plato’s primary argument against sophistry is that it is not an art, but only a knack because sophists are not concerned with what is best for a person’s soul, but only concerned with what pleases their audience. The analogy he uses is the true politician is concerned with the soul, as the doctor to the body and a sophist is concerned with the soul, as the pastry chef is concerned with the body. A pastry is not good for the health of the human body and the thoughts and focus of sophists are not in good intentions of a humans soul. Plato does not see them as noble rhetoricians, but instead, sees them as ignoble and the counterfeit part of politics. He describes them as having the least power of all citizens. Sophists also go against Plato’s idea on teachers, that they have a public obligation to teach their students, by accepting pay for their teachings.…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Paine and Patrick Henry were both artist in the field of political speaking. Being able to manipulate and persuade the masses with a snap of the figures and doing it with such grace and power. This happened by the men using pathos, logos, ethos, logical fallacies, and the rhetorical triangle to be able to persuade be people who heard their words and make people listen to a absolute purpose with intelligence and emotion behind…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his essay, When We Can’t Wait on Truth: The Nature of Rhetoric in the Rhetoric of Science, Nathan Crick explores the question, what is the relationship between rhetoric and truth? Crick’s purpose is to inform all readers that rhetoric has a crucial validating role in science. The author references Alan Gross’s published work, The Rhetoric of Science, in which he contributed to the initiation of a controversy concerning the place of rhetoric in science studies, while also arguing for the continued significance of the classical rhetorical tradition. Gross’s main idea of the text was “rhetorically, the creation of knowledge is a task beginning with self-persuasion and ending with the persuasion of others” (Gross, 1996, 3). However, in…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The early Church was birthed through perseverance against intense persecution: (i) physical persecution by the governments of the time which lauded the oppression, imprisonment, torture and death of Christians for their new religious doctrines; and (ii) intellectual persecution by opposing religious sects who sort to denounce the doctrines of Christianity. The Prescription Against Heretics was written in response to the latter – to defend the tenets of Christianity against the false teachings of heretics and religious-based philosophers. Heretics promoted controversial views which were in opposition to those offered by Christian doctrine, with the intention of creating followers of their beliefs. Religio-philosophers were quasi-Christians who promoted the use of intellect and logic to understand Christianity and in doing so, never becoming Christians. Tertullian saw the end of philosophy as heresy and categorizes both as the same. Tertullian defends Christianity by describing heresies as powerless, fallible and only expressive of a lack of faith; he therefore provides a rule of faith as a measure and the authority for Christianity.…

    • 1779 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many writers of philosophy and philosophical history tend to write off this period as not so important, perhaps a sort of learning curve period, not to be taken too seriously. Not so, this Pre-Socratic period laid extremely important foundations on which others were able, effectively, to build. Among them honourable men who, (although today we may consider them to be 'off their trolley,') at least spoke their true thoughts and beliefs, but in the main of course, incorrect because they lacked knowledge. Not all that followed were so honest with their true thought, unlike Socrates, who died for his and although we attach him to the next phase, he was of course of this time. Then again perhaps those that were to follow had more reason to be fearful of the consequences of speaking the truth as they saw it. The basic question at this point in the history of thought was, whether there was any way out of Agnosticism and scepticism. Perhaps and more to the point we might ask ourselves, what is wrong with agnosticism and scepticism, bearing in mind what we know up to this point in time, and how it is to be camouflaged for future generations? We will observe as we progress through these early times, how religions and religious thought is developed and moulded into every-day…

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nietzsche and Saussure show in their articles that the speaker or viewpoint is what leads to the illusions of rhetoric causing misunderstanding to persuade society. Society today lives off these illusions of rhetoric Nietzsche states that “The art of dissimulation reaches its peak in humankind, where deception, flattery, lying and cheating, speaking behind the backs of others, keeping up appearances, living in borrowed finery, wearing masks, the drapery of convention, play-acting for the benefit of others and oneself.” (Nietzsche 142) This shows that society today lives off deceit and have become accustomed to spitting out false news than telling the truth. These lies are what leads to the illusions or misunderstandings in society. The interesting…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Ideology of Consensus

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The church spokesmen and Cambridge Platonists were encouraged morals rather than Dogma. Christian liberals tried to update Christianity by allowing the ideas of Enlightenment. Now it is the age of reason. They tried to tell people that God is great, harmonist and he does not exist only for punishment but is also forgiving. They also affirmed that religious is about charity, it is exists to help people. Bigotry was not required; you should hear the opinions of others. . In addition, they could introduce Aesthetics and Ethics were…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    World History Hw

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Also, Social Darwinism was a belief particular to the age. Many felt that it was their Christian duty to civilize the savage peoples and use the natural resources of the lands to their best advantage.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pls 201

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    sophist: One who teaches promising young men the practical skills to succeed in public life. (realists)…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays