Preview

Compare and Contrast Public Goods, Private Goods, Common Resources, and Natural Monopolies

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
494 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare and Contrast Public Goods, Private Goods, Common Resources, and Natural Monopolies
Compare and contrast public goods, private goods, common resources, and natural monopolies

Public goods is a product that an individual can consume without decreasing its accessibility to another individual and without segregation. Economists refer to public goods as "non-rivalrous" and "non-excludable". National defense, sewer systems, public parks and basic television and radio broadcasts all fall into consideration for public goods. One problem with public goods is the free-rider problem that benefits from the product without paying for it. For example, if a person fails to pay his taxes, he still receive the same benefits as his paying neighbors.
Private goods is an item of consumption is used by one party and not available for others to use; things like food and clothing are intended for only one party. A private good IS rival and excludable. Another example of a private good is a neighbor’s house. A manufacture or builder may have three design style of homes to build in any given community and cannot afford to supply a house to everyone in the population to own one. This will also grant each owner excludable meaning he or she does not have to allow anyone else to occupy or live in the home.
Common resources is a resource freely accessible to all members of the public who wish to obtain benefits from it. Examples are nature-made, like forests, rivers, and lakes, while others are made by humans as in canals and reservoirs. Common resource are difficult to limit its access to the public and are vulnerable to overuse.
The greediness of a few individuals can ruin the resource for the community at large. An example using a public fishing ponds would fit if one person caught more fish than the law allowed or stated was the maximum limit then it would lead to harming everyone's a change to benefit from that pond’s fish products. This is also reflective to government bans on off seasonal hunting and fishing to keep the products population levels fair for all

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Chap 16 Govt 2302

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages

    13. Something that must be supplied by the government because it cannot be provided by the marketplace is called a 2. public good.…

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The tragedy of commons is when people share a common resource they tend to deplete is because of self-interest and for a short term profit.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eco405

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    References: Kling, A. (2008, August). Public Goods, Externalities, and Education. Retrieved Aug 8, 2012 from website:http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2008/08/public_goods_ex.html…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. What is a common resource? Water would be a great example here. For a common resource is a natural or human made resource that others can still benefit off of. Such as water let’s just say you and the family want to go canoeing, but the in order to do so you have to pay in order to have the right to the water.…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    One distinction that must be made is between real and pecuniary costs. Real costs represent a withdrawal of resources from other potential uses- they represent a subtraction from society’s total welfare. Pecuniary costs represent costs borne by some members of the community but which are exactly matched by benefits received by others. For example, assume that…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Xeco Week 4 Checkpont

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Public goods can be used by anyone in the public for free and private goods have to be paid for and are impossible for someone else to benefit from once used…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Three Economic Stances

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. What are three economic stances that a government may have? Describe each of these stances. The three economic stances that a government is one neutral which is a neutral stance indicate a balance economy leads to more tax revenue for the government. Second one is expansionary which is describing by spending more money than it collect. The last one is Contractionary which means the government is collecting more money than spending it or uses it.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Government: Governments has limited resource that it can use for community wants eg) constructing a new motor-way, at the expense of a new school.…

    • 1955 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    From an individual’s limited perspective, abuse of the resource may have little to no negative effect on him or people around him, but can be of great personal benefit. The rationality intrinsically present in abusing a public resource is known as The Free Rider Problem, and is one of the most challenging issues faced in preserving public goods. Due to the limited damage done to the public good by the free rider, as well as the benefits the individual gains from said abuse, the decision to abuse a resource may be seen as maximizing utility. Thus, from a limited perspective, the decision to abuse the resource is not only the rational decision, but, in a utilitarian framework, abuse becomes the moral decision. The problem inherent in this line of reasoning is that if enough people make this decision, the resource is destroyed in what is known as The Tragedy of the Commons. The challenge posed by the free rider problem is therefore a significant hurdle for utilitarianism as an individual moral framework to…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A public good is defined as, “a good that is available for everyone to consume, regardless of who pays and who doesn’t, a good that is nonrival in consumption and nonexcludable”. With this type of good it is unpractical to keep the people that did not pay for the good from enjoying it the same way as those who had paid. Some examples of public good’s are, public defense, streetlights, police service, children play parks, and the fireworks. Most of these services are supported by taxes, but if someone does pay their taxes they still can benefit from the services that others are paying for. The people that do not pay for these types or goods or services are called free riders.…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Because a public good is a good or service in this case whose consumption by one person does not exclude consumption by others. This means that in this case the fourth of July fireworks are a public good because is not going to end because of how many people see them. In my own opinion I think that everybody should pay for their own goods just like private goods. Is really not fair for people who spend their money pay for them but in other hand how can we manage to separate the people who pay with the ones who doesn’t.…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nevertheless private property eliminates the incentive for people to share. This disadvantage leads to people becoming more indulgent in themselves and themselves only. Stopping sharing is the gateway for individuals to become more self-oriented and selfish. This would lead to the disruption of the law of nature, because people will in fact take more than what they need from the…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Deer Hunting Tragedy

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Page

    The tragedy of the commons explain how a resource or resources are shared by many individuals but there is no particular person that has access to claim any part of the resource, other than for personal gain. Because the resources are open to the public, it’s considered to be “fair game”. A good example of what would be considered the tragedy of the commons would be deer hunting. Deer hunting is a lucrative hobby. Many people today deer hunt for a hobby but the economical side of it has increased as well, as more and more restaurants and stores are selling deer meat. Because the forests and other heavily populated areas that house deers are not privately owned, this allows for more people to chime in on this low-key money making trait, making…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Principles of Economics

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In Economics, market goods in four different categories grouped by characteristics of being excludable or rival in consumption. Excludable basically means one person can prevent the use by another person. A rival in consumption means the use of a good by one person eliminates the opportunity for another person to use that same good. The four different groups of goods are private goods, public goods, common resources, and natural monopolies. Private goods are goods that private firms produce for profit available to people but not available to all people. Examples of private good are food, clothing, toys, furniture, and cars. According to Mankiw (2007), private goods are excludable and rival in consumption because someone can prevent some from obtaining a good and the use of a good prevents others from obtaining the same exact good. Natural monopolies are goods which are excludable but can be used without limitations. For example, a cable company can exclude people from accessing cable by charging for cable, but there is no limit on the consumption. Public goods are the exact opposite of private goods. Public goods are free, available to everyone, and there is no decrease in the availability by use of others; therefore public goods are neither excludable or rivals in consumption (Mankiw, 2007). Air is an example of a public good. In general, the intake of air by one individual does not decrease the supply of air to other…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A marginal social benefit is a marginal benefit enjoyed by a household (or business) in actually consuming (or producing) a…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays