Preview

Comparative Analysis of Austin & Searle's Speech Act Theories<Tab/>

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3134 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparative Analysis of Austin & Searle's Speech Act Theories<Tab/>
Speech-act theory was elaborated by Austin J. L., a linguist philosopher; this theory was the reaction of Austin and his coworkers in opposition to the so-called logical positivist philosophers of language. Austin in contrasts to logical positivism that could be assessed in terms of 'truth' and 'falsity' ('known as truth conditional semantics'), was keen on the way regular people use language in everyday situations. Moreover, he was persuaded that we do not use language to tell only things, meaning to make statements, but also to do things, that is to perform actions (Thomas, 1995: 28-31). This is the core element of his theory.

Although, Searle accepts that the speech act is both meaningful and has conventional force, he analyses the dimensions of the speech act differently. The major difference is that Searle is postulating a propositional act which is subdivided into a reference act and an act of predication. In addition, he also speaks of the (incomplete) speech act of predication which Austin did not mention. (ibid.: 93). Therefore,the evaluation of Austin and Searle's theories will illustrate the advantages and disantages but also the gaps of its theory.

Austin's Theory

Performatives & constantives

The first distionction made by Austin concerning the use of language is the categoriazation of verbs into performatives nad constatives. He also maintained that only performative verbs are used to denote actions; for example: I name this ship the King George. Whereas, the sentence I drive a red car is a constative one. Constatives can be tested whether they are true or false, a phenomenon that does not occur in perfomantives because the utterance I name this ship the King George do not make statement, therefore it can not be treated as being true or false. This sentence is best interpreted as performing an action, thus a useful test for performative verbs is the insertion of the adverb hereby between subject and verb: I hereby name this ship the King George,



Bibliography: 1.Brown, G. & G. Yule. (1996). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press. 2.Coulthard, M. (1996). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. New York:Longman. 3.Stubbs, M. (1998). Discourse Analysis. The Sociolinguistic Analysis of NaturalLanguage. Oxford: Blackwell. 4.Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in Interaction. An Introduction to Pragmatics. NewYork: Longaman.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful