Republicans, led by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, strongly opposed America becoming a land of cities, mines, mills, factories, and other industrial plantations. To support their ideas for a country of farmers, they adopted the theory of strict constructionism. This theory put forth the thought that the government did not have the power to do anything, unless it was expressly given the consent by the Constitution. Federalists, on the other hand, promoted the growth of industry in America. This party, lead by Alexander Hamilton, used the idea of broad constructionism. It said that unless the Constitution said it could not be done, it was fine to go ahead and do it. They often referred to the Necessary and Proper Clause, also known as the Elastic Clause; this stated that the government had the power to pass any law deemed "necessary and proper." These two ideas obviously clashed frequently, and still do today. However Jefferson's idea of an agrarian republic free of industry is absolutely absurd. Without the development of cities and industries there would not be a trade industry which would allow the farmers to trade and prosper. With no trade, farmers would not be able to market their surplus and the surplus in the American economy would cause prices to fall. This situation would produce little profit for farmers and eventually a severe recession... [continues]
Cite This Essay
(2005, 05). A Comparative Analyis: Jefferson vs Hammilton. StudyMode.com. Retrieved 05, 2005, from http://www.studymode.com/essays/Comparative-Analyis-Jefferson-Vs-Hammilton-57731.html
"A Comparative Analyis: Jefferson vs Hammilton" StudyMode.com. 05 2005. 05 2005 <http://www.studymode.com/essays/Comparative-Analyis-Jefferson-Vs-Hammilton-57731.html>.
"A Comparative Analyis: Jefferson vs Hammilton." StudyMode.com. 05, 2005. Accessed 05, 2005. http://www.studymode.com/essays/Comparative-Analyis-Jefferson-Vs-Hammilton-57731.html.