Communication was taking place among the Trinity even before the Creator said, “Let there be light.” And within a week of saying that, he had made a being who, having been created in His likeness, likewise communicated. The “Community of Persons” had created a being unlike any He had previously made. And as we gain a better understanding of communication, something in which both Creator and created participate, we will likely find ourselves better able to relate with God and with others.
Hundreds of explicit and implicit definitions of communication have been published in the communication and related literatures for use by scholars and practitioners trying to describe, predict, and understand communicative phenomena. These definitions vary around the common language definitions, with variations depending on individual scholarly interests and general scholarly trends.
In this paper nonetheless, we shall critically and clearly discuss the truthfulness of Sillars (1988) definition of communication as giving, receiving or exchange of information, options or ideas by writing speech or visual means or any combination of the three so that the material communicated is completely understood by everyone concerned and Asha (2005) definition of communication that, “it’s a two way process in which there is exchange and progression of ideas towards a mutually acceptable goal” with the help of three other scholars in as far as the definition of communication is concerned. The paper begins by giving other definitions to communication before the main discussion and later on drafts a conclusion.
Communication is a slippery concept, and while we may casually use the word with some frequency, it is difficult to arrive at a precise definition that is agreeable to most of those who consider themselves communication scholars. Communication is so deeply rooted in human behaviors and the structures of society that it is difficult to think of social or behavioral events that are absent communication.
Given a set of requirements for a definition of communication, we can define communication as information that enters a process and eventually leaves its inverse process (Weekley, 1967: 338). For example, information is transmitted by speaking and received after processing by its inverse, hearing. This definition can be used to precisely describe and explain communication phenomena in an inclusive and exact manner. The nature of processes and their development is considered. Communication processes may support other processes, including non-communicative, evolutionarily adaptive processes supporting survival and reproduction. Communication is expected to develop in self organizing systems, given certain assumptions. Receiving processes may be understood as information filters and their performance described, predicted, and understood. These precise definitions of communication and information can serve as the basis for a science of librarianship.
“Communication,” which is etymologically related to both “communion” and “community,” comes from the Latin communicare, which means “to make common” or “to share.” DeVito (1986: 61) expanded on this, writing that communication is “the process or act of transmitting a message from a sender to a receiver, through a channel and with the interference of noise”. Some would elaborate on this definition, saying that the message transmission is intentional and conveys meaning in order to bring about change.
Putnam (2006: 43) defined Communication as a process by which we assign and convey meaning in an attempt to create shared understanding. This process requires a vast repertoire of skills in intrapersonal and interpersonal processing, listening, observing, speaking, questioning, analyzing, and evaluating. Use of these processes is developmental and transfers to all areas of life: home, school, community, work, and beyond. It is through communication that collaboration and cooperation occur.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document