Common couple’s violence
Therapists give out a few classes that can help couples that commonly fine with violence relationships. “Relationship violence is highly prevalent among couples seeking therapy yet few couple therapists regularly assess for violence. There is a limited lesson on the type of violence most characteristic of couples in this population. The current study uses latent class analysis to examine types of violence in a sample of 273 therapy seeking couples. The results support a three class typology, with the groups labeled no violence, low level violence, and moderate to severe violence. Comparisons between the classes support hypothesized differences between groups in degree of marital satisfaction and difficulties in communication providing further validation of the typology among couples seeking treatment (Simpson, L. 2007).” This program teaches and helps them with self control and not just with the body but also with mind.
“The differentiated between low level violence and what he refers to as “common couple violence,” and more severe abusive violence, known as battering or “patriarchal/intimate terrorism.” He based this typology on the vast differences in prevalence and frequency of aggression found in community survey studies of aggression and studies of battered women and battering men. He suggested that these differences were due to sampling of two distinct populations (Simpson, L. 2007).” Domestic violence is cause by an individual with poor problem solving skills.
“In one population, violence is characterized by relatively infrequent acts of mild to moderate aggression (e.g., pushing, shoving, and slapping) that occur as a result of frustration, poor problem solving skills, and arguments that get out of control. He hypothesized that in this type of aggression, which he called "common couple violence," acts of violence by men and women occur at relatively equal rates, with rare instances of injury, and are not committed in an effort to control or terrorize a partner (Simpson, L. 2007).”
“It consists of systematic efforts by one partner to control, dominate, and terrorize the other through acts of physical violence, emotional abuse, economic control, sexual coercion, and social isolation. The sample consists of 273 married, heterosexual couples that had expressed interest in participating in a study of marital therapy. The average age of participants was 39.7 years (SD = 9.0) for wives and 41.6 years (SD = 9.2) for husbands (Simpson, L. 2007).” Data show that the highest percents of waves that’s involve with domestic violence are Caucasian.
“Statistics show that Sixty-eight percent of wives were Caucasian, 5.1% were Asian American, 8.7% were African American, 8.0% were Latina, 0.4% was Native American, 3.6% were of some other ethnicity, and 5.8% declined to report their ethnicity. Seventy-two percent of husbands were Caucasian, 3.6% were Asian American, 9.5% were African American, 6.9% were Latino, 0.4% were Native American, 2.2% were of some other ethnicity, and 5.5% declined to report their ethnicity (Simpson, L. 2007)”
“The average length of marriage was 9.4 years (SD = 7.8), couples had an average of 1.4 (SD = 1.2) children, and both husbands and wives had an average of 16 years of education (SD = 3.0). Sixty-five percent of wives and 85% of husbands were employed at the time of the study. Tests of Johnson’s typology of relationship aggression have so far been restricted to composite data from women reporting on their own behaviors (Simpson, L. 2007).” Report from colleague found two cluster solution failed to create the different categories found previously.
“The sampling techniques believed to result in bias towards reports of male violence towards women. This study assessed whether the typology would be found in a sample of 1350 respondents unselected for partner violence. Measures of physical aggression and its escalation, injuries,...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document