Preview

Common Causes of Rebellion in the Period from 1485 to 1603

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1214 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Common Causes of Rebellion in the Period from 1485 to 1603
'Disputes over the succession to the English throne were the most common cause of rebellion in the period from 1485 to 1603.' How far do you agree with this view?

There is no doubt that dispute over the succession to the English throne were the most common cause of rebellion, as stability in England in terms of Kings withered until the arrival of Henry VII.

Right from the start Henry VII reign as the monarch of England was to be disturbed by constant rebellions from elite conspirators, in 1486 Lovell and the Stafford brothers led the Yorkists rebellion, Lovell who was a close confidante to Richard III was the major figure behind the conspiracy.
The reason for the rebellion was because Henry VII had attained Lovell and this meant all his lands and property were lost, while the Stafford's had been in sanctuary since the Battle of Bosworth. Although this rebellion was quickly dealt with by Henry, it was merely an ominous sign of things to come.
Both attempts to overthrow Henry by Yorkists. Both failed. Both represent faction and succession.

This came in the shape of a boy named Lambert Simnel who claimed to be Edward VI, nephew of Richard III. The scheme was believed by many and Lambert Simnel was crowned Edward VI in Dublin Cathedral. They had support from Ireland, and Burgundy as Duchess of Margaret was Richard III sister. Henry had heard of events gathering pace and he again responded immediately to the rebellion, Henry army outnumbered the rebels at the Battle of Stoke however it did help that the majority of the English nobility and gentry showed their loyalty. Once again we see the Yorkist faction attempting to change the succession.

Again Henry reign was under scrutiny with a yorkist prince claiming his right to the crown of England. Perkin Warkbeck another pretender was taken in by a Yorkist; John Taylor who had lost his post under Henry VII he had since devoted time into turning Warbeck into Richard of York. However due to a lack of support by

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Legitimacy is the key to a successful kingship. If you can be perceived as an effective and legitimate ruler by the nobility, you will remain in power. This was especially important in the early period of the reign of Edward IV because the son of Henry VI, Edward of Westminster, was still alive until he was killed at the Battle of Tewkesbury on 4th May 1471. If Edward IV not establish the legitimacy in the minds of the nobles, then they could easily justify overthrowing the usurper because the son of the rightful king, Edward of Westminster, was still alive. Our extract shows us this attempt to legitimise Edward IV by delegitimising the overthrow of Richard II by saying that Henry IV took the throne through illegal…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Popular protest in the 16th century could pose a dangerous challenge to the monarch and the state. How far is the statement accurate in relation to years 1536-69?…

    • 1226 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Edward VI died in 1483, there was debate as to who was most suited to take up his position on the throne. It has been argued that Richard, Duke of Gloucester had himself set on usurping the throne from the rightful heir Edward V, as soon as his brother died. Others argue that it was never the case that his immediate wishes were to seize the throne; actions after his brother’s death led him to this decision. There is evidence for and against to support the principal statement.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ‘Most Tudor governments underestimated the threat presented by rebellions in England and Ireland.’How far do you agree?…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, because of the issues with the will, there was no direct heir to the throne, and it was either going to be Edward V on the throne or Richard of Gloucester, nonetheless Edward IV’s son Edward V had to take the throne. However, because Edward V was a minor, the two factions competed to control the country until Edward V was old enough where he could govern by himself, thus resulting in a bitter feud within the Yorkist family. This…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ii) Elizabeth had no children so the crown went to Mary Queen of Scots, a Catholic.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After Edward IV died in 1483, a dispute began between to major factions – the Woodvilles and Richard of Gloucester. The Woodvilles were the family of Elizabeth Woodville, Edward’s wife, with whom he shared many children. Edward V, the heir to the throne, was the son of Elizabeth Woodville, and so this put them in a good position. However, Richard of Gloucester was Edward’s brother and had shown himself to be a very useful and successful man to Edward during his reign. They both had their various strengths and weaknesses, and they both wanted the same thing. Control of England.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1676 and 1739 there were a lot of rebellions, uprisings, wars, and revolts in colonial America. Two specific rebellions are Bacon’s Rebellion, which occurred in 1676, and the Stono Rebellion, which occurred in 1739. These two rebellions were caused by pent up anger and tension between slaves and indentured servants and white people. Both Bacon’s Rebellion and the Stono Rebellion were the cause of Native American and Slave tensions.…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 1470 Edward IV’s rule was challenged by the former monarch that he had usurped, Henry VI, and one of the key reasons as to why he was able to overcome this challenge was due to his popularity as king. Edward had proved to be an able king who was also young, strong and handsome, which is severely juxtaposed to the monarch he had usurped, as Henry VI was old, a less than capable ruler and thought to be insane. This meant that not only his original usurpation of Henry in 1461 was considered more acceptable to England’s population as it was most likely going to better the country; it also meant that Henry’s usurpation of Edward in 1470 was especially unfavourable with the population. Another reason why Edward was able to overcome his challenge of usurpation was at that time France was very unpopular with England, which is unsurprising as it is said that ‘England’s national hobby was going to war with France’, and Henry VI’s wife, Margaret of Anjou was the French kings niece. This marriage alone would be enough to make Edward appear more favourable with the general population; however it seemed likely that if Edward had not usurped, an alliance between the two countries would proceed, which only served to support Edward’s campaign to get back on the throne. Nonetheless, the most damaging factor to the position of the opposition is most likely the circumstances that the Lancastrian house found themselves in as with the deaths of both their key supporter, the Earl of Warwick, at the Battle of Barnet and of the Lancastrian heir, Edward, Prince of Wales at Tewkesbury, the Lancastrian position was no longer considered viable. The popularity of Edward IV was not repeated with Richard III however, and this combined with the fact he usurped a king that was showing great…

    • 1818 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Explain why Edward IV’s death opened up such a bitter family feud in the weeks from 9th April to 26th June 1483 (12 marks)…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the sixteenth century, peasants and the poor rose against the German states and their lords. To show their unhappiness, the peasants and poor would perform rebellious actions and created the grievances in word in hope to make a change with their lords' control over them. The probable main cause for the rebellion and uprisings was due to the hatred on the lords oppressions. Responses varied, considering that lords and theologians such as Martin Luther did not agree with the choice of the peasants while some other theologians did agree with the peasants and even urged and praised them to continue.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fling

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Once Richard took the throne he was known as Richard III. He was the great-great-grandson of Edward III and the uncle of the previous king Edward V. It was rumoured that he caused the death of the princes in the tower. Although it was never proven he had a motive to do it because he wanted the throne for himself. To help himself get there he also started a rumour that Edward IV and Elizabeth Woodville’s marriage was illegitimate because Edward had already been set to marry someone before Elizabeth. People believed what they heard which meant they believed that Edward V was also illegitimate to have the throne, and so shortly after Richard was made king. During his reign the Buckingham Rebellion took place. Henry Stafford, The Duke of Buckingham, was once a loyal supporter of Richard but switched sides to bring Richard down. This caused Richard to build a huge army, but it wasn’t particularly strong. The rebellion failed leaving Richard still on the throne; however it left a…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first ever civil war broke about between King Charles I and his parliament. To name, there are many causes which lead up to this, three major which are: money, power, and religion. It was said that Charles I wasn’t a strong king as was his father (King James VI and I) yet some blame parliament for their arrogance to the new power. This essay will explain the three causes, their triggers and which was the most important cause of the first ever Civil War in England.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Perkin Warbeck

    • 2487 Words
    • 10 Pages

    First we are going to look at how Warbeck managed to rise in the first place. As the story goes, he was working for a cloth merchant from Flanders and arrived in Cork where he was showing off the goods. When people saw how finely dressed he was, they immediately took upon him and told him that he was the ‘Earl of Warwick’, who was Edward IV’s great nephew. However knowing that this threat could easily be tackled by Henry VII who had the actual Earl of Warwick in the tower of London, he quickly changed his identity to Richard, Duke of York. This is where it becomes a threat to Henry, with a very weak claim to the throne himself, a Duke of York imposter would be highly difficult to disprove as the priest who had buried the bodies of the children was dead so could not justify their identity. In reality, the plot had probably been pre planned by Margaret of Burgundy, who looked to avenge Richard III, her brother.…

    • 2487 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tudor governments were relatively successful in dealing with the problem of rebellion, although this was more effective towards the end of the period than at the beginning shown through the decline in rebellion after 1549: only 5 English rebellions occurred as opposed to 10 before 1549. Over the course of the Tudor period the main aims of rebellions were only fully achieved in the rebellions of 1525, the Amicable Grant and 1553. In addition to this the reforms made to local government, policies directly implemented by central government and the effects of trials and retribution, such as Henry VII’s concessions made to the late 15th century pretenders, Lambert Simnell and Perkin Warbeck and later in the period during Elizabeth’s reign, who recognised rebel Shane O’Neil as Earl of Tyrone, all contributed to the reduction in the frequency and scale of English rebellions. Pre-emptive strikes implemented by Tudor governments were also instrumental, especially during the start of the period in Henry’s reign and later in Elizabeth’s reign, in preventing rebellion or stopping riots from becoming dangerous rebellions. In some areas these strategies and tactics worked better in some areas than others; Irish rebellions were generally more costly and more difficult to suppress.…

    • 2557 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays