Preview

Cohabitation: New Life Style or Disaster

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2899 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cohabitation: New Life Style or Disaster
AT 32, one of my clients (I’ll call her Jennifer) had a lavish wine-country wedding. By then, Jennifer and her boyfriend had lived together for more than four years. The event was attended by the couple’s friends, families and two dogs.
Readers’ Comments
Readers shared their thoughts on this article.

When Jennifer started therapy with me less than a year later, she was looking for a divorce lawyer. “I spent more time planning my wedding than I spent happily married,” she sobbed. Most disheartening to Jennifer was that she’d tried to do everything right. “My parents got married young so, of course, they got divorced. We lived together! How did this happen?”
Cohabitation in the United States has increased by more than 1,500 percent in the past half century. In 1960, about 450,000 unmarried couples lived together. Now the number is more than 7.5 million. The majority of young adults in their 20s will live with a romantic partner at least once, and more than half of all marriages will be preceded by cohabitation. This shift has been attributed to the sexual revolution and the availability of birth control, and in our current economy, sharing the bills makes cohabiting appealing. But when you talk to people in their 20s, you also hear about something else: cohabitation as prophylaxis.
In a nationwide survey conducted in 2001 by the National Marriage Project, then at Rutgers and now at the University of Virginia, nearly half of 20-somethings agreed with the statement, “You would only marry someone if he or she agreed to live together with you first, so that you could find out whether you really get along.” About two-thirds said they believed that moving in together before marriage was a good way to avoid divorce.
But that belief is contradicted by experience. Couples who cohabit before marriage (and especially before an engagement or an otherwise clear commitment) tend to be less satisfied with their marriages — and more likely to divorce — than couples who do

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Cohabitation and Couples

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A Nationwide study conducted by The National Marriage Project, in 2001, found that almost fifty-percent of adults in their twenties, would not marry someone unless if he or she moved in together first (Jay). Jay writes, “About two-thirds said they believed that moving in together before marriage was a good way to avoid divorce.” This idea of taking your partner on a, “test-drive,” to prevent negative situations down the road, is wrong. “Couples who cohabit before marriage (and especially before an engagement or an otherwise clear commitment) tend to be…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “When you realize you want to spend the rest of your life with somebody, you want the rest of your life to start as soon as possible.” This beautiful quote is from the comedy, When Harry Met Sally. After Harry recited this line to Sally, she fell into his arms and began to passionately kiss him. This quote is not just about love, it also explains cohabitation and marriage. When couples fall in love they want to spend the rest of their lives together, just like Harry and Sally. After a person thinks about beginning the next chapter of their life with the one they love, two choices arise. One can marry their significant other or move in together without any strings attached.…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cohabiting couples cannot just live their lives satisfied, comfortable, and in a better financial position, also their kids can live comfortably with a good role model. Meg Jay, author of “The Downside of Cohabiting before Marriage” points out a great fact about marriage that contradicts Doe’s definition of how easy to get divorce. Jay shows the difficulty of getting out of marriage when she says, “Lock-in is the decreased likelihood to search for, or change to, another option once an investment in something has been made.” (Jay, 251). Even though she points out a great point about marriage being the right kind of relationship if someone wants a long-term commitment, it can also harm the parents and their future child in the long run. To elaborate…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One reason is changing social attitudes. Religion regarded cohabitation as ‘living in sin’, but today there is less shame attached to it. Barlow et al found increasing acceptance of cohabitation. This shows that the change in religions social attitude, cohabitation is accepted more, leading to an increase in cohabitation. Some people prefer love that focuses of on intimacy, closeness and emotion rather than the duties of marriage. Giddens argues that there has been a trend towards confluent love. This love focuses on the intimacy, closeness and emotion of a relationship, rather than the feelings of obligation and duty that is in vows at marriage. When a marriage no longer has confluent love, the relationship is likely to end. This shows that monogamy may start being replaced by serial monogamy, in which cohabitation is most suited to. However, the ONS found that 60% of cohabiting couples will eventually end in marriage showing that monogamy can often replace serial monogamy. There is less pressure to follow traditional norms and values. Beck and Beck-Gernshiem argue that individualism has led to changing attitudes towards cohabitation and marriage. There is less pressure to follow the norms and values around love and relationships set by family, religion or culture. This shows that the change in attitudes has led to people making their own decision about whether they marry or cohabitate. The acceptance of sex outside marriage has made it more likely that cohabitation will occur. Allan and Crow argue that effective contraception has made it possible for partners to cohabit without fear of pregnancy. This alongside the acceptance of sex before marriage means cohabitation without marriage is likely to occur. This shows that the change in social attitudes towards sex outside of marriage has led to an increase in cohabitation.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Neil does bring in some premises that are relevant to that. Neil brings up some states showing that children born to cohabiting parents experience separation of their parents before the age of “16” at “75%” compared to those married at around “one third” . If it was demonstrated that a separation of parents lead to a negative impacts in a child’s life and behavior then the premise might stand. Unfortunately since so few cohabiting couples decide to have children that the net parent separation rate bellow 16% is probably higher for married couples. Neil states that women are more likely to face “physical and sexual abuse” when living in cohabitation compared to a marriage. Neil fails to bring any stats or proof to that claim or anything thing showing that cohabitation is the cause and not just in correlation. An argument is made that relationships will not be as good as married relationships because the partners will not be “genuine and authentic” due to the thinking that “their partner may bolt at the first sign of trouble.” One could rebut that be not having this security would make both partners put more effort into maintaining the relationship due to the fact that they know their partner can leave much more easily. I find it hard to believe that married people are “emotionally, physically, financially, and vocationally” better off because the apparent studies are not listed and we are not informed in what way those statistics were…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    David Popenoe said that those who live together before marriage have higher separation and divorce rates. To support the thesis, David found many studies to conclude that living in a non-marital union has a direct negative impact on subsequent marital stability. He reported the findings of Yale University sociologist Neil Bennett that cohabiting women were 80% more likely to separate or divorce than were women who had not lived with their spouses before marriage. He also take the other study in the Journal of Marriage and Family (Binstock 2003), it found within two years, 32.4 percent of cohabiting couples in the study had separated, while only 8.3 percent of the married couples did. On the allegation that cohabitation increases the risk of divorce, AtMP take the study from Marriage and Family Formation Data Analysis Project, March 2003. This study showed that although cohabitation engenders somewhat more liberal attitudes toward divorce, it does not increase the likelihood of marital disruption. AtMP argue that those studies ' conclusions are frequently misrepresented in the media because the most consistent and strongest predictor of whether a given…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cohabitation is the living together and having a sexual relationship often without the individuals being married. Over the last 40 years there have been many changes to patterns of marriage and cohabitation and new patterns have formed. One main pattern that has began to be seen, is marriage is on a decline. This is due to a number of reasons.…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: Grover, Sam. "Similarities Between Cohabitation & Marriage | EHow." EHow. Demand Media, 15 June 2011. Web. 14 July 2013.…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1960 less than a half a million people cohabitated. Today that number is closer to five million people along with another half a million same sex couples living together. During the 1990s fifty-six percent of the marriages that occurred were preceded by living together first. There is greater than a fifty percent chance that a woman will marry if she has lived with the man for more than five years. More than half of high school seniors’ believe that it is a good idea to live together before marriage. If you are divorced you are more likely to cohabitate. There are advantages to living together before you are married. Economically it may provide a better life for the two people to be able share household expenses. People who are on public assistance may lose that assistance if they are married. College students may choose to live with their significant other secretly as to not lose their parents assistance. It also provides people with a way to share a life without the legal entanglements of marriage. Some people believe that cohabitation will strengthen their relationships and eventually lead to marriage. Other studies show that living together first show a divorce rate twice as high after ten years of marriage. Cohabitation may not actually be the cause of divorce though. Typically people who with less traditional views of marriage cohabitate together. Because they already value the idea less that may be what leads to eventual…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The 20th century has been the scene of rapid social change. Educational, political, economic and religious institutions have been changing and morphing as the century progressed. These institutional changes have impacted individuals and families in dramatic ways. Gender roles have changed, family mobility has increased, fertility has declined and union formation patterns have become more fluid and less stable (Morrison, 2015). Over the past 40 years cohabitation has moved from being viewed as a deviant form of union formation to the preferred social norm as a transition from dating to marriage. Cohabitation is when a couple lives together for an extended period as if they were married, but is not a legal agreement. Many couples that are planning…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    We typically commit one person at a time. From an evolutionary perspective, monogamous pairing makes sense (parents who cooperated to nurture children more often passed on their genes to future generation). Bonds of love are most satisfying and enduring with a similarity of interests and values, emotional and material spot, and intimate self-disclosure. Those who commit with marriage more often endure, esp. after age 20. The divorce rate is 2x higher than 40 years ago, reflecting women's lessened economic dependence and people's rising expectations. Studies show that those who live together before marriage have higher rates of divorce and marital dysfunction because cohabiters tend to be initially less committed to the ideal of enduring marriage and then they become even less supporting during the…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cohabitation is on the rise plain and simple, in the textbook on page 331 figure (9.1) shows that. In 1960 it shows that about .6 million couples were living together that were not married, this is what cohabiting means. Then fast forward 60 years and that number has jumped a crazy amount. Now that number that was .6 million, has risen to a little over 7.4 million couples living together. This graph is going straight up and I don’t see it stopping anytime soon. I am going to be talking about all the reason people are resorting to cohabitation. It is a smart move…

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cohabitation Before Marriage

    • 2513 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Did you know that over half of all first marriages are now preceded by living together compared to virtually none 50 years ago? The number of unmarried couples living together increased tenfold from 1960 to 2000. The number of unmarried couples living together increased 72% between 1990 and 2000. By the year 2010, if the present trend continues, there will be 7 married couples for every cohabiting couple. (Cohabitation Facts, "Cohabitation - It's Training for Divorce”- Chuck Colson (1995). Here are some statistics on cohabitating couples. These numbers show that as times go on more and more people will be living together before marriage. What is your opinion on cohabitation before marriage? Is this something that you see yourself doing in the future?…

    • 2513 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Meg Jay compared the cohabitation to a credit card when your signing up for it with a 0% interest and after a while it goes up and later after you cant keep up with the payments you feel stuck, and that's how it feels with the cohabitation. Today many people believe that if you end up living with the person you love that nothing will come out good that you would just be wasting your time. Another disadvantage of cohabiting would be if it doesn't work out then one person would up end losing everything. “The best time to work on someone’s marriage is before he or she has one” (Meg Jay).…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Trial Marriage

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The reason why cohabitation may setup couples for failure in marriage is because cohabitation is just a test. Since all couples suffer from some incompatibility, when the other partner “fails” the test, the person moves on to the next partner. A succession of cohabitation failures results in an inability to maintain commitment-the most important part of a marriage relationship.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics