Preview

Coca Cola and Pepsi War

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
561 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Coca Cola and Pepsi War
The Coca Cola and Pepsi War 1. Why is the soft drink industry so profitable?

* The soft drink industry remains profitable because of the market share based on Porters Five Forces.

* Coke has protected its recipe for over a hundred years as a trade secret, and has gone to great lengths to prevent others from learning its cola formula. The company even left a billion-person market (India) to avoid revealing this information. As a result of extended histories and successful advertising efforts, Coke and Pepsi are respected household names, giving their products an aura of value that cannot be easily replicated. Also hard to replicate are Coke and Pepsi’s sophisticated strategic and operational management practices, another source of added value.

2. Compare the economics of the concentrates business to the bottling business and why is the profitability so different?

* The CPs negotiate on behalf of their suppliers, and they are ultimately dependent on the same customers.

* Many of their functions overlap; for instance, CPs do some bottling, and bottlers conduct many promotional activities.

* The fundamental difference between CPs and bottlers is added value. The biggest source of added value for CPs is their proprietary, branded products.

* In 1993, CPs earned 29% pretax profits on their sales, while bottlers earned 9% profits on their sales, for a total industry profitability of 14%

* Overall, because of the CPs efforts in diversification, however, substitutes became less of a threat.

3. How has the competition between Pepsi and coca cola affected the industry profits?

* Revenues are extremely concentrated in this industry, with Coke and Pepsi, together with their associated bottlers, commanding 73% of the case market in 1994. Adding in the next tier of soft drink companies, the top six controlled 89% of the market.

* Price wars resulted in weak brand loyalty and eroded margins for both companies

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both Coca-Cola and Pepsi have an agreement with their own bottler who specializes in this field. Moreover, the agreement restrains the bottlers to carry other brand. For instance, Coke bottler could not carry Royal Crown Cola.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    By reducing the threat of backward integration and substitute inputs, and by implementing favorable contracts, concentrate producers exercised control over buyers and increased profits.…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    he brewing industry in 1985 can be analyzed using Porter's five competitive forces: threat of new entrants, bargaining power of suppliers, bargaining power of buyers, substitutes and rivalry among existing competitors. All five competitive forces jointly determine the intensity of industry competition and profitability. Furthermore, the five forces narrow in on why the brewing industry became more concentrated and key features defining industry success.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cola Wars

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Both Coke & Pepsi have segmented the soft drink industry into two divisions, via –…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In my view concentrated products are more profitable then the bottle products or bottle business is because of the reason that high quality material is used in it. The concentrated products are considered to have less superior material as compared to the bottled one, which means that there is less quantity mixed with water which gives nearly the similar taste but still you can easily differentiate. A lot of restaurants promote the fountain pops or concentrated products and bottled have high quality material and less mixture.…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Background: The Atlanta–based Coca-Cola Company controls about 65 per cent of the soft-drink market. Pepsi-Cola has about 15 per cent. The rest belong to other soft-drink products.…

    • 3630 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Each of these companies’s has a similar business plan that is targeted at a particular population. Each company runs their business with high moral and ethical standards and there are many companies out there model their business plans after Coke and Pepsi but not many reach the level that Coke and Pepsi are on.…

    • 1780 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Five Forces (Coke Wars)

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The soft drink industry can be described as a Duopoly since Pepsi and Coke are the two firms competing. The market share of the rest of the industry is too small to be a factor. The competition between the companies has never…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cola War

    • 586 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Soft drinks are profitable because it is a $60 billion industry in the United States alone. Not only is it profitable in the United States, but both Pepsi and Coca-Cola have expanded their franchises internationally and both have become competitive brands. It is estimated that the average American can consume about 53 gallons of carbonated soft drinks a year. According to the article, Americans drink more soda than any other beverages on the market today, such as sports drinks, juices, and beers. This makes carbonated soft drinks more profitable than the other beverages because it has a higher consumption rate. Another reason why carbonated soft drinks are profitable is that it is easy to make since it is made up of a flavor base with added sweetener and carbonated water. These main ingredients are relatively cheap compared to the bottling process. Since 1970, the growth of carbonated soft drinks continues to rise 3% per year for the next 30 years because of diet carbonated soft drinks and other flavored drinks. Soft drinks are also found in supermarkets, convenient stores, vending machines, and restaraunts. This makes the soft drinks more accessible to their customers. Soft drinks are also consumed by cans, plastic bottles, glass bottles, and fountain drinks.…

    • 586 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many of their functions overlap; for instance, CPs do some bottling, and bottlers conduct many promotional…

    • 3389 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cola Wars

    • 1579 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Coke is it -- it being the world's #1 soft-drink company. The Coca-Cola Company (TCCC) owns four of the top five soft-drink brands (Coca-Cola, Diet Coke, Fanta, and Sprite). Its other brands include Minute Maid, Powerade, and Dasani water. In North America it sells Groupe Danone's Evian; it also sells brands from Dr Pepper Snapple Group (Crush, Dr Pepper, and Schweppes) outside Australia, Europe, and North America. The firm makes or licenses more than 3,000 drinks…

    • 1579 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The economics of the CP and bottling is very different from each other in terms of number and size of rivals, and the scope of competitive rivalry. There are two giants competing head to head on the CP industry, smaller national producers, such as Seven-Up and Dr Pepper, are relatively trivial. There are a lot of players of same size in the bottling industry. Unlike the furious competition between Pepsi and Coke, no sense of competition can be felt in bottling industry. Reasons are that, first, Pepsi and Coke control the majority of bottlers in 1990s; second, intrabrand competition is restricted by the franchise agreement, which is protected by 'Soft Drink Interbrand Competition Act'.…

    • 1931 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cola Wars Continue

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2) Compare the economics of the concentrate business to that of the bottling business: Why is the profitability so different?…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Danonecase

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The bottled water market is the most vibrant segment on the drink market with a market share about 38% (report by Global Industry Analysts Inc.). The market is dominated by four international companies: Nestlé, Danone, Coca-cola and Pepsi.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Soft Drink Industry

    • 2188 Words
    • 9 Pages

    With the growth in volume, the average level of profitability of the soft drink industry remains quite high. First, the concentrate producers (CP’s) have become integrated with bottling companies, thereby reducing production costs. The CP’s and bottlers remain profitable through interdependence, sharing promotional and…

    • 2188 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays