Una Woods1
School of Law, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
Email: una.woods@ul.ie
Abstract:
Boundary disputes are an unfortunate fact of life. This paper illustrates the difficulties currently faced in Ireland by those seeking to demonstrate adverse possession of boundary land and discusses alternative remedies which may be relied upon to resolve boundary disputes. Recently, concerns have been expressed in Ireland and elsewhere in relation to the fairness of the doctrine, in particular the way it enables the deliberate squatter who is fully aware that he is not the owner of the land to acquire title to it. In England and Wales, the Land Registration Act 2002 introduced substantive reforms to the law on adverse possession of registered land which restrict its operation in the context of boundary land to adverse possessors who can satisfy a good faith requirement. In 2005 the Irish Law Reform Commission proposed certain reforms to the law on adverse possession, including the imposition of a good faith requirement in relation to boundary land in language which mirrors that used by the English 2002 Act. This paper discusses the interpretative difficulties which the English good faith requirement may give rise to and reveals a vacuum which this new approach creates in the resolution of boundary disputes that may leave certain ‘deserving’ possessors of boundary land without a remedy. The Irish Law Reform Commission plans to revisit the matter of reform in this area of law in the near future. If a good faith requirement is imposed in relation to adverse possession of boundary land, certain lessons could be learned from the English experience and also the Australian approach to boundary disputes, which relies heavily on mistaken improver and building encroachment legislation.
Keywords: Boundary dispute; adverse possession; Ireland
1 Introduction
1.1
References: Black F. and Healy T., 2008. Judge makes plea for peace in Kenny Land War. The Irish Independent, 12 April. Breen, O., 2000. Registration of Title and Overriding Interests – Another Crack in the Mirror? Conveyancing and Property Law Journal 5(3), 52. Commission on Land Registration, 2008. Green Paper proposing Reform of Boundary Surveys in Ireland Dublin: Irish Institution of Surveyors Fitzgerald, B., 1995 Hargrave, L., 1998-1999. Ruminations on the Revision of the Louisiana Law of Acquisitive Prescription and Possession 73 Tulane Law Review 1197-1230. Jordan, S., 3003. Adverse Possession. London: Butterworths LexisNexis. Law Commission, 1998 Law Commission, 2001. Land Registration for the Twenty-First Century: A Conveyancing Revolution (LC 271). London: Law Commission. Law Reform Commission, 2005 Law Reform Commission, 2008. Consultation Paper– Alternative Dispute Resolution (LRC CP 50 2008). Dublin: Law Reform Commission. McAllister, D.L., 1973 Mee, J. 1998. Lost in the Big House: Where Stands Irish Law on Equitable Estoppel? 23 Irish Jurist (ns) 187-219. Merrill, T.W., 1984-1985. Property Rules, Liability Rules and Adverse Possession. 79 Northwestern University Law Review 1122-1154. Miceli, T.J. and Sirmans, C.F., 1995. An Economic Theory of Adverse Possession 15(2) International Review of Law and Economics 161-173. O’Connor, P., 2006 O’Connor, P., 2007 An Adjudication Rule for Encroachment Disputes: Adverse Possession or a Building Encroachment Statute? In Cooke, E., ed. Modern Studies in Property Law: Volume 4. Oxford: Hart, 197-217. Sperling, D., 2008 Stake, J.E., 2000-2001. The Uneasy Case for Adverse Possession’ 89 Georgetown Law Journal 2419-2474. Woods, U. and Wylie, J.C.W., 2005. Irish Conveyancing Law. West Sussex: Tottel Publishing.