To what extent should we blame liberal principles for the inequalities that exist in society, and should these liberal values be challenged whenever possible? The source expresses the idea that liberalism has created a discrepancy between the rich and the poor, inequality among individuals, and a lack of services for the people due to little government involvement. The source believes that if the principles of liberalism were to be questioned whenever possible, it would lead to a more equal society. The author appears to be to be rejecting all liberal principles, and is a supporter of collectivism. A government that values socialism protects the economy from instability. By intervening in the economy, a government can prevent drastic boom and bust cycles. Socialist governments provide social programs for those in need, which will narrow the gap between the rich and the poor, thus making individuals economically equal. However, liberalism can benefit the social aspect of society because it promotes the rights of the individuals so long as they are not infringing on the rights of others. This allows for greater freedom and class mobility, something not possible under other forms of government. If any of the components were taken to the extreme ends of the political structure, the result would be failure due to anarchy or communism. Classical liberalism should be challenged when it comes to economics and politics, but the social aspect of a nation is more equal when it is controlled by classical liberalism.
Classical liberalism causes a socioeconomic gap between the rich and the poor, and eventually leads to a breakdown in economic order. In France, during the 1800’s, the economic aspect of society was controlled by capitalism. A slow economy, unemployment, and the development of class systems, which consisted of the bourgeoisies and proletariat, resulted from little to no government intervention. The Bourgeoisie exploited the proletariat for their self-interest...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document