There is enormous criticism over Huntington’s thesis as culture is not the sole dominating source of conflict among civilizations as a few aspects of contention being significant. First, it is disputed that nation-states and policy based on power rather than ideals will continue to be the motivating force between conflicts. Second, the world’s progressively modern structure will tear natives away from their ancient local identities. Third, the divergence of societies from each other because of tradition, language, and religion will continue to wreak the most violent conflicts.
Many theorist stand firm on various motivating forces which could lead to future conflicts: will it be the competition for power and security through self-interested states as Realist express; can the Liberalist continue to push the democratic system, universal monetary relationships, and global societies reinforcing peace; or, does the Idealistic view of international diplomacy formed from convincing thoughts, shared standards, customs, and communal characteristics rule lands. The U.S.is currently the lead power broker of the 21st Century, squarely focused on achieving its national interest objectives, receiving criticism from many international actors along the Western and non-Western spectrum.
The Chinese currently pursue their self-interests, especially in Africa. They outwardly display this internationally due to their critical need for oil and energy because of a large populace,... [continues]
Cite This Essay
(2011, 10). Clash of Civilizations. StudyMode.com. Retrieved 10, 2011, from http://www.studymode.com/essays/Clash-Of-Civilizations-812159.html
"Clash of Civilizations" StudyMode.com. 10 2011. 10 2011 <http://www.studymode.com/essays/Clash-Of-Civilizations-812159.html>.
"Clash of Civilizations." StudyMode.com. 10, 2011. Accessed 10, 2011. http://www.studymode.com/essays/Clash-Of-Civilizations-812159.html.