Preview

Biography of Clarence Thomas

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1339 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Biography of Clarence Thomas
In 1991, the prestigious Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall announced his retirement (“Clarence Thomas”, pg. 2). Justice Marshall set the precedent for racial equality in America, putting Clarence Thomas at the opposite end of Marshall’s liberal agenda. At this time, Clarence Thomas was working on the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, a common “stepping stone” to the U.S. Supreme Court (Clarence Thomas, pg. 2). President Bush had been eager to nominate Thomas to the court, and on July 1, 1991, he afforded him the opportunity (“Clarence Thomas”, pg. 1). This was a chance of a lifetime for Thomas. Once Thomas was nominated concerns began to surface. Would there be backlash from Civil Rights committees for his criticism of the Brown v. the Board of Education (Abramson and Mayer, pg. 117)? The Bork hearings had recently ended, and the politics in the air ran thick. The “war over the Supreme Court” within the last twenty years was never more intense than at Clarence Thomas’ confirmation hearings (“Clarence Thomas”, pg. 2). Learning from the Bork experience, the political strategies would be coming from inside and outside the beltway. If successful, the campaign would deflect attention from Thomas’s record and qualifications, showing him as nothing less than the people’s choice (Abramson and Mayer, pg. 122). A prominent outsider to lead the battle was political consultant, Kenneth Duberstein. Duberstein knew that the way to play the game was to use Thomas’s hard knocks background, creating what was called the “Pin Point Strategy” (Abramson and Mayer, pg. 123). Duberstein arranged to have multiple murder boards with Thomas. Questions were raised on past rulings and speeches, and when it came down to his opinions on minority rights and abortion he was told to say nothing definitive (Abramson and Mayer, pg. 128).
On September 10, 1991, Thomas and his team sat with the Senate Judiciary Committee, chaired by Joseph Biden (“Clarence Thomas”, pg. 2).


Bibliography: Abramson, Jill and Jane Mayer. Strange Justice: The Selling of Clarence Thomas. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1994. Print. “Clarence Thomas”, Biography.com 19 January 2012. http://www.biography.com/people/clarence-thomas-9505658. Clarence Thomas. The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. 20 January 2012. http://www.oyez.org/justices/clarence_thomas/.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Judge Clarence Thomas Case Study
    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Judge Clarence Thomas Case Study

    In her open statement on the sexual harassment hearings, Anita Hill recounts the details of how Judge Clarence Thomas took advantage of working relationship between them and conducted inappropriate sexually offensive behaviors toward her. Although Hill does not feel comfortable to reveal her vulnerability, she keeps a very formal and constraining tone while she illustrates in details of the process in which Judge Thomas intentionally ignored her refusal on his innumerable invitations to social outings. Admitting to having poor judgement, Hill is still trying to portray a despicable and heinous character of Judge Clarence, and proves to the court that his illegitimate action deserves punishment.…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Assess the Leadership of John Marshall as Chief Justice
    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Assess the Leadership of John Marshall as Chief Justice

    4.) Assess the leadership of John Marshall as Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Gideons Trumpet Chapters 6-10
    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gideons Trumpet Chapters 6-10

    As we continue through Gideon’s Trumpet, Anthony Lewis continues to explain the complicated process that the Supreme Court takes in hearing a case. There are many instances in which Lewis shows how he is in favor of thick, procedural democracy. Lewis emphasizes the process of judicial review; the prejudice is the court system, the history of ones right to counsel, and how the court was changing at the time. Through these examples, Lewis shows how the Supreme Court is not a perfectly unbiased system; it is quite adequate in its process. However, as this book relates to American Creation, the time and place of the novel played a pivotal role in fate of Clarence Earl Gideon. Throughout this section of Gideon’s Trumpet, Lewis shows that the case of Gideon v. Cochran and later Gideon v. Wainwright was not as important as the time at which the case occurred.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Neil Gorsuch Kathleen Parker Analysis
    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Neil Gorsuch Kathleen Parker Analysis

    Kathleen Parker gives her judgment on newly appointed supreme court justice Neil Gorsuch. Her purpose is to denounce the ‘left wing’ slander of this new ‘right wing’ judge. Parker states facts and gives reasoning to show why we should feel secure about Trump’s appointee. In the article, Kathleen Parker using contradicting descriptions of Neil Gorsuch to display his true characteristics. When recalling the Democrats reaction to Neil Gorsuch, Parker says they painted Gorsuch as a ‘cruel and bloodless beast who shrinks from the light and plays havoc with history.’ However, contrasting this view are Gorsuch true characteristics; a man who is ‘courageous in protecting the people and the constitution by adhering to the text and original intent without…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Clarence Thomas: A Brief Biography
    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Clarence Thomas: A Brief Biography

    Clarence Thomas was born on June 23, 1948 in Pin Point, Georgia. He spent most of his childhood living with his grandfather and step-grandmother in Savannah, Georgia. When he was young, his grandfather wanted him to follow a religious career path and he transferred high schools in order to become a priest. He was also very involved in the civil rights movement as a young man. After Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated, he left the south and attended Holy Cross College in Massachusetts where he studied English. After he graduated from Holy Cross, he went to study at Yale University Law School. He began as an attorney in Missouri where he then moved to Washington D.C. and was appointed a Supreme Court Justice by George H.W. Bush to replace…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Plessey Vs. Ferguson Case: Racial Segregation In The United States
    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Plessey Vs. Ferguson Case: Racial Segregation In The United States

    From 1877 up to the middle of the 1960s there was organized racial segregation in the United States. This was achieved because it was thought that blacks were believed to be inferior to whites. This organized segregation was done by a series of changes to the law in the south known as the Jim Crow laws. The first time that the United States government made a ruling whether or not these laws were actually legitimate under the US constitution was with the Plessey v Ferguson case. They were upheld granting states the ability to institute segregation. Sixty Years later these same laws affected the Brown v Board of Education case and they were considered unconstitutional. The Plessey vs.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Antonin Scalia Research Paper
    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Antonin Scalia Research Paper

    Antonin Scalia was a very wise, smart educated man who was driven by politics. “He was born in Trenton, New Jersey, March 11, 1936. He married Maureen McCarthy and has nine children named, Ann Forrest, Eugene, John Francis, Catherine Elisabeth, Mary Clare, Paul David, Matthew, Christopher James, and Margaret Jane. He received his A.B. from Georgetown University and the University of Fribourg, Switzerland, and his LL.B. from Harvard Law School, and was a Sheldon Fellow of Harvard University from 1960–1961. He was working in a private practice in Cleveland, Ohio from 1961–1967, a Professor of Law at the University of Virginia from 1967–1971. In 1972, Antonin Scalia entered public service when President Nixon appointed him general counsel for the Office of Telecommunications Policy where he helped formulate regulations for the cable television industry. And he also was a Professor of Law at the University of Chicago from 1977–1982, and a Visiting Professor of Law at Georgetown University and Stanford University” (Court, 2013).so he had his hands tied up in a lot of different important places with many important people.…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Summary Of My Own Words Ginsburg
    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Summary Of My Own Words Ginsburg

    The book also includes several of her own Court opinions and dissents in which this principle is illustrated – namely, her dissents in Shelby vs. Holder and Gonzales vs.…

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Incoherence Of Antonin Scalia
    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Incoherence Of Antonin Scalia

    Joan Biskupic’s novel In American Original: The Life and Constitution of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, describes Scalia’s success as an influential conservative force in the Supreme Court, which conservative lawyer, Alfred S. Regnery, bolsters, expanding on William Rehnquist’s role in establishing the groundwork allowed for a major a shift towards right in courts, in The American Spectator article, “The Good Old Days”. Regnery begins by establishing he agrees with Biskupic’s assertions that Scalia has been the “most influential member”: “changing the terms of the debate at the Court” and influencing many. Regnery, however, submits that although the degree of Scalia’s achievements hadn’t been accomplished before, Rehnquist, in fact…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ideological Drift in Supreme Court Justices
    • 7837 Words
    • 32 Pages

    Ideological Drift in Supreme Court Justices

    Justice Harry Blackmun was once quoted saying “I don’t believe I’m any more liberal, as such, now than I was before” he argued that it was the Court that had changed its ideologies, not himself. To answer this our group looked into the influences and effects that played a role in justice preferences and case outcomes, so we decided to look at the ideological effects of individual justices on the Court itself. From that framed core interest, we came up with a research question of, “In the confines of the Burger Court (1969-1986), do the justices of the United States Supreme Court drift ideologically over their tenure on the bench?” We felt that this very narrow and extremely controlled Court era would allow us to best approach our hypothesis without the bias of changing courts, inexperienced justices, and Chief Justice turnover. Thus, our hypothesis came to be that justices ' ideologies tend to drift towards the center of the spectrum over their tenure largely due to their life appointments, personal experiences, and court experience. Throughout our paper you will notice references to Martin-Quinn scores, our main source of quantitative data, and an individual breakdown of justice’s who served during Burger’s tenure as Chief Justice. We include a brief discussion of the Burger Court, but then largely leave his influence behind and focus on those who shared the bench with him. We do this in an attempt to remove his influence as a Chief Justice, while making each of the justices we analyze hold equal authoritative position relative to each other in the voting process. Thus, we blend empirical data and individual case studies together in an effort to understand both how and why justices shift, as well as in what direction. In our data…

    • 7837 Words
    • 32 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    course notes for history and government, whichever
    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages

    course notes for history and government, whichever

    This month, Jefferson returned to private practice, leaving his post on the highest civil court in Texas nine years after he was appointed its chief by Governor Rick Perry. I recently interviewed him by telephone on a series of issues. First up was the notion of judicial elections. Here's a slightly edited version of our lengthy conversation (the first of a series I'll be posting here at The Atlantic over the next few weeks). Jefferson's remarks aren't just notable for their candor about the structural failure of the state's judicial campaigns. They also shed valuable insight into the motivations behind that failure -- and explain why things aren't likely to change anytime soon.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Recusal Study Essay
    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Recusal Study Essay

    The subject of recusal is not the most studied issue either. Much of the literature available and some used here is related to recusal but not necessarily the primary focus. It is still relevant and clearly connects though, and this study will illustrate that. For example, much of the history and background of the study is the same for a variety of subjects written about the Supreme Court. Terms of Engagement by Clark M. Neilly III claims that the Supreme Court’s actions restrict the constitutional theory of limited government.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Prejudice In The 1930s Essay
    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Prejudice In The 1930s Essay

    Many people know that people of color, especially African Americans, were treated quite unfairly around the 1930s - many don’t know, however, that the same horrendous treatment is still present today. In the 1930s, most people held prejudices against those of other races, and those prejudices became known through the decisions of the legal system. Now, it has been about 90 years, and society has yet to make the necessary improvements to counteract the influences of such prejudices on the legal system. True, there have been many changes in the American Legal system over the past years, however, it has not changed drastically enough so as to provide justice to everyone.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Racial Patterns in Dating and Marrige
    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Racial Patterns in Dating and Marrige

    Just four decades ago On June 13, 1967, President Johnson nominated a then United states Solicitor General Thurgood Marshall to be the first African American named to U.S. Supreme Court. Although, a mere months earlier Thurgood suffered an indignity that today seems not just outrageous but almost incomprehensible. He and his wife had found their dream house in a Virginia suburb of Washington, D.C., but could not lawfully live together in that state: he was black and she was East Asian. Fortunately for the Marshall's, in January 1967 the Supreme Court struck down the anti-interracial-marriage laws in Virginia and 18 other states. And by the end of 1967 these laws were just leftover scraps from an extinct era.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    History Of The United States Supreme Court
    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages

    History Of The United States Supreme Court

    In recent history, the two individuals that have brought forward the most change by the Supreme Court are Chief Justices Earl Warren and Chief Justice William Rehnquist. While both approached the way they ran the court in different manners, they were both viewed as good leaders of the court. Chief Justice Earl Warren served as the 14th Chief Justice. During this time, he was considered a successful Chief Justice and got his way using “forceful leadership” styles (history). Warren was so favorable during his reign that some have even considered him to be ranked with the top three Chief Justices’ of all time (history). The period in which Chief Justice Warren served is now known as the Warren era. Many of Warren’s greatest court decisions during this time, aligned with the views the liberal democrats of that era. Some of his most influential cases surrounded the topics of unconstitutional segregation of public schools, the right of counsel to the poor, and the use of miranda warnings. In contrast, Chief Justice William Rehnquist lead the court in a much different manner. One of the biggest reasons Rehnquist was appointed to his position was because his moral beliefs aligned with the conservative’s opinions for social issues. His morality and the fact that both liberal and conservative members of the court recognised that Rehnquist would be a “superb chief…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics