Preview

Biography of Clarence Thomas

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1339 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Biography of Clarence Thomas
In 1991, the prestigious Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall announced his retirement (“Clarence Thomas”, pg. 2). Justice Marshall set the precedent for racial equality in America, putting Clarence Thomas at the opposite end of Marshall’s liberal agenda. At this time, Clarence Thomas was working on the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, a common “stepping stone” to the U.S. Supreme Court (Clarence Thomas, pg. 2). President Bush had been eager to nominate Thomas to the court, and on July 1, 1991, he afforded him the opportunity (“Clarence Thomas”, pg. 1). This was a chance of a lifetime for Thomas. Once Thomas was nominated concerns began to surface. Would there be backlash from Civil Rights committees for his criticism of the Brown v. the Board of Education (Abramson and Mayer, pg. 117)? The Bork hearings had recently ended, and the politics in the air ran thick. The “war over the Supreme Court” within the last twenty years was never more intense than at Clarence Thomas’ confirmation hearings (“Clarence Thomas”, pg. 2). Learning from the Bork experience, the political strategies would be coming from inside and outside the beltway. If successful, the campaign would deflect attention from Thomas’s record and qualifications, showing him as nothing less than the people’s choice (Abramson and Mayer, pg. 122). A prominent outsider to lead the battle was political consultant, Kenneth Duberstein. Duberstein knew that the way to play the game was to use Thomas’s hard knocks background, creating what was called the “Pin Point Strategy” (Abramson and Mayer, pg. 123). Duberstein arranged to have multiple murder boards with Thomas. Questions were raised on past rulings and speeches, and when it came down to his opinions on minority rights and abortion he was told to say nothing definitive (Abramson and Mayer, pg. 128).
On September 10, 1991, Thomas and his team sat with the Senate Judiciary Committee, chaired by Joseph Biden (“Clarence Thomas”, pg. 2).



Bibliography: Abramson, Jill and Jane Mayer. Strange Justice: The Selling of Clarence Thomas. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1994. Print. “Clarence Thomas”, Biography.com 19 January 2012. http://www.biography.com/people/clarence-thomas-9505658. Clarence Thomas. The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. 20 January 2012. http://www.oyez.org/justices/clarence_thomas/.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    After the Supreme Court was established pursuant to Article Three of the United States Constitution in 1789, the extent to which the Supreme Court can affect social change has always been disputable. Scholars developed different definitions of social change and looked in different fields to discuss the Court's effect. Expanding on their ideas, I argue that the Court is successful in generating attention from society to the cases it decides on, yet it takes time for changes in public opinion and implementing the rulings. Focusing on three significant cases decided by the Court— Brown v. Board of Education (Brown) in 1954, Roe v. Wade (Roe) in 1973, and Obergefell v. Hodges (Obergefell) in 2015, and drawing together and analyzing data and…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Court System Interview

    • 1334 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When the United States Constitution was established, the founding fathers devised the core of the court system that is present in today’s society. The state and federal government each have a version of a Supreme Court which is typically led by a Chief Justice. The states level Supreme Court Justice governs the issues that pertains to the citizens within the respective state. These individuals will also take part in hearings or proceedings that impact of law of the state and hear constitutional cases with regards to the state. On the federal side, a Supreme Court Chief Justice will operates more on a national level, ruling over cases that such as states taking one another to court. The federal court has authority over anything to do with the United States Constitution and this paper will interview State Supreme Court Justice Roy Moore on the current issue of same-sex marriage that was recently passed for the state of Alabama.…

    • 1334 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Carp, Robert A., Ronald Stidham, and Kenneth L. Manning. "chapter 6." Judicial process in America. 8th ed. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press, 2011. 125. Print.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Clarence Thomas

    • 3655 Words
    • 15 Pages

    In the annals of American history, this name has risen to the forefront of noted Supreme Court Justices and has become synonymous with the ideals and philosophies of uncompromising conservatives. Undeniably, the same name also congers thoughts of hypocrisy, desertion, and self-denial toward one of America 's most divisive and enigmatic political figures. Since his nomination by President George H. Bush to the United States Supreme Court, Justice Thomas has been inundated with criticism by those who oppose his expressed jurisprudence and with praises by those who follow his hard-nosed, unapologetic style of governance in his role as America 's second African-American Supreme Court Justice.…

    • 3655 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Smith, F. (1998, January). The Struggle for Justice Continues. The Attica Talk Flyer. Retrieved September 13, 2004, from http://www.etext.org/Politics/MIM/aa/atticatalk.html…

    • 1957 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Which justice, emphasizing his refusal to compromise judicial views, said, “Originalists have nothing to trade!”…

    • 1942 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lct1 Task 1

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Through the words and tones he uses to express himself, it is evident that the subjective perspective resulting from his obvious knowledge of the scriptures leads him to see the decisions made by various political groups as less than responsible. When discussing the Supreme Court’s decision overturning the Defense of Marriage Act, Thomas uses phrases such as “increasingly secular and indifferent society” , “difficult to persuade”, and “ nearly impossible to restrain”(Thomas, 2013). Through these phrases, he shows his knowledge of the continuing decline in the lack of morals and the lack of religious discipline of society and political leaders. Using faith-based words like “Creator and Higher Authority” implies that Thomas has a religious background that persuades his faith-based subjectivity. Words like “indifferent” and “ineffective” show his underlying view that previous decisions were not responsible decisions because Americans no longer set standards for themselves or rely on a “Higher…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Wohl, R. (2012, April 23). The Upside of the DOJ Lawsuit. Publishers Weekly Vol. 259 Issue 17, p. 56.…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Just four decades ago On June 13, 1967, President Johnson nominated a then United states Solicitor General Thurgood Marshall to be the first African American named to U.S. Supreme Court. Although, a mere months earlier Thurgood suffered an indignity that today seems not just outrageous but almost incomprehensible. He and his wife had found their dream house in a Virginia suburb of Washington, D.C., but could not lawfully live together in that state: he was black and she was East Asian. Fortunately for the Marshall's, in January 1967 the Supreme Court struck down the anti-interracial-marriage laws in Virginia and 18 other states. And by the end of 1967 these laws were just leftover scraps from an extinct era.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thought That We Hate

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Anthony Lewis has always held his head high where it has concerned the American Judiciary – Lewis’ praise for the American judiciary is arguably sensible and thorough in its worthy aspect. Not only does he excel as a reporter and a columnist at the New York Times, but where it concerns his authorship he has been equally exceptional in his craft. In his latest book, “Freedom for the Thought That We Hate” Lewis has the same heroic view of the American Judiciary to portray and he does it with his usual flair, with his typical – subtle, but very much inherent – admiration for the Judiciary, and for everything that he stands for. Similar to his incomparable, thorough, and critical account of the 1963 Supreme Court Case, Lewis does not lag in sending…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justice Harry Blackmun was once quoted saying “I don’t believe I’m any more liberal, as such, now than I was before” he argued that it was the Court that had changed its ideologies, not himself. To answer this our group looked into the influences and effects that played a role in justice preferences and case outcomes, so we decided to look at the ideological effects of individual justices on the Court itself. From that framed core interest, we came up with a research question of, “In the confines of the Burger Court (1969-1986), do the justices of the United States Supreme Court drift ideologically over their tenure on the bench?” We felt that this very narrow and extremely controlled Court era would allow us to best approach our hypothesis without the bias of changing courts, inexperienced justices, and Chief Justice turnover. Thus, our hypothesis came to be that justices ' ideologies tend to drift towards the center of the spectrum over their tenure largely due to their life appointments, personal experiences, and court experience. Throughout our paper you will notice references to Martin-Quinn scores, our main source of quantitative data, and an individual breakdown of justice’s who served during Burger’s tenure as Chief Justice. We include a brief discussion of the Burger Court, but then largely leave his influence behind and focus on those who shared the bench with him. We do this in an attempt to remove his influence as a Chief Justice, while making each of the justices we analyze hold equal authoritative position relative to each other in the voting process. Thus, we blend empirical data and individual case studies together in an effort to understand both how and why justices shift, as well as in what direction. In our data…

    • 7837 Words
    • 32 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    From 1877 up to the middle of the 1960s there was organized racial segregation in the United States. This was achieved because it was thought that blacks were believed to be inferior to whites. This organized segregation was done by a series of changes to the law in the south known as the Jim Crow laws. The first time that the United States government made a ruling whether or not these laws were actually legitimate under the US constitution was with the Plessey v Ferguson case. They were upheld granting states the ability to institute segregation. Sixty Years later these same laws affected the Brown v Board of Education case and they were considered unconstitutional. The Plessey vs.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people know that people of color, especially African Americans, were treated quite unfairly around the 1930s - many don’t know, however, that the same horrendous treatment is still present today. In the 1930s, most people held prejudices against those of other races, and those prejudices became known through the decisions of the legal system. Now, it has been about 90 years, and society has yet to make the necessary improvements to counteract the influences of such prejudices on the legal system. True, there have been many changes in the American Legal system over the past years, however, it has not changed drastically enough so as to provide justice to everyone.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Joan Biskupic’s novel In American Original: The Life and Constitution of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, describes Scalia’s success as an influential conservative force in the Supreme Court, which conservative lawyer, Alfred S. Regnery, bolsters, expanding on William Rehnquist’s role in establishing the groundwork allowed for a major a shift towards right in courts, in The American Spectator article, “The Good Old Days”. Regnery begins by establishing he agrees with Biskupic’s assertions that Scalia has been the “most influential member”: “changing the terms of the debate at the Court” and influencing many. Regnery, however, submits that although the degree of Scalia’s achievements hadn’t been accomplished before, Rehnquist, in fact…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antonin Scalia was a very wise, smart educated man who was driven by politics. “He was born in Trenton, New Jersey, March 11, 1936. He married Maureen McCarthy and has nine children named, Ann Forrest, Eugene, John Francis, Catherine Elisabeth, Mary Clare, Paul David, Matthew, Christopher James, and Margaret Jane. He received his A.B. from Georgetown University and the University of Fribourg, Switzerland, and his LL.B. from Harvard Law School, and was a Sheldon Fellow of Harvard University from 1960–1961. He was working in a private practice in Cleveland, Ohio from 1961–1967, a Professor of Law at the University of Virginia from 1967–1971. In 1972, Antonin Scalia entered public service when President Nixon appointed him general counsel for the Office of Telecommunications Policy where he helped formulate regulations for the cable television industry. And he also was a Professor of Law at the University of Chicago from 1977–1982, and a Visiting Professor of Law at Georgetown University and Stanford University” (Court, 2013).so he had his hands tied up in a lot of different important places with many important people.…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays