“But, to speak practically and as a citizen unlike those who call themselves no-government men, I ask for not at once no government, but at once a better government. Let every man make known what kind of government would command his respect, and that will be one step toward obtaining it (Thoreau) ” ____________________________________________________________
Over the course of time, not much has changed when talking about the United States government. Like the American government was criticized in the 1500’s, the same government receives the same criticism over one hundred years later. The main difference between the criticism back then and the criticism now has to do with respect. Thoreau’s criticism is well thought out and educated, unlike in modern times, where everyone gives their opinion regardless if they know anything about that situation or not. Every single decision that the government makes has been, is, and will always be criticized by the United States’ citizens. Thoreau acts like a gentleman in his criticism probably because he knows his opinion stands a better chance of being heard when he acts respectfully compared to when he acts disrespectfully.
In Civil Disobedience, Thoreau is trying to tell the government officials that they need to be more respectful and considerate towards the citizens. When the government is forced to make a decision, they know that they cannot please everyone, and that there will be people that disagree with the decision that the government has made. In reality, there will never be a day where both the people and the government are able to decide and fully agree on a topic, but if the government respects and considers all angles when making a decision, there is more of a possibility that the people may eventually support the government with their decision, not act spitefully towards the...