Preview

City States vs. Empires (Mesopotamia)

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
751 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
City States vs. Empires (Mesopotamia)
City-States vs. Empires

The first civilizations emerged thousands of years ago in a region in the Middle East called Mesopotamia. Around 4000 B.C.E, a group called the Sumerians invaded Mesopotamia and organized their civilization, Sumer, into many city-states. A city-state is a self-governing state that consists of a city and its surrounding territory. Some Sumerian city-states include Kish, Uruk, Lagash, and Ur. In these city-states, the Sumerians would develop a sense of culture and create new systems of writing, government, art, and religion that would impact future civilizations. The Sumerian city-states would soon be conquered by larger empires that wanted more land and wealth. An empire was more advantageous to the people of Mesopotamia because it was easier to defend from invasions, there was a stronger central government, and different products and technology were shared throughout the region.
An empire was more beneficial because there was more protection against attacks and invasions. The Sumerian city-states only governed and defended themselves which made them very weak compared to neighboring civilizations. The Sumerian civilization declined when the king of the Akkadian empire, Sargon, conquered the southern Mesopotamian region around 2350 B.C.E. After the Akkadians, the Babylonian empire took control of the region. Since the empires were large, powerful armies were created which prevented the civilization from being attacked. An empire’s army is stronger because there are more people working together and they have the same goal. The city-states didn’t communicate or work together to defeat other civilizations. The more civilizations eliminated, the less of a chance the empire will become a victim. An empire was more benevolent because it provided the people with more protection from neighboring civilizations. Empires were advantageous because they had strong, stable governments. A government’s main job is to prevent chaos and promote

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    14. Sumer was located in southern Mesopotamia and was divided into different city-states. What’s a city-state?…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    History Quizz

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages

    With few precedents to guide them, the population of Mesopotamia adapted and created Answer | | Social organization | | | Writing | | | Agricultural cultivation | | | Development of religion | | | Competition amongst different groups | 1 points Question 2 The earliest urban societies so far known emerged in the Answer | | First millennium B.C.E | | | Third millennium B.C.E | | | Sixth millennium B.C.E | | | Second millennium B.C.E | | | Fourth millennium B.C.E | 1 points Question 3 After 3000 B.C.E. all Sumerian cities were ruled by what form of government? Answer | | Monarchy | | | Councils of elders | | | Dictators | | | Assemblies of citizens | | | Military governors | 1 points Question 4…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first Mesopotamians were the Sumerians who had city-states. Sumerian cities were surrounded by a wall and used large supply of mud to their advantage. Many large buildings and structures were made of mud bricks. Sumerian cities had a theocratic government in which many priestly figures had great power. A temple was built to serve the priests and priestesses but soon kings came into play. Kings were the sole rulers of governments. Kings had full authority of armies and people. Farming was big in Mesopotamia and there were many different products of trade. Inventions like the wheel were made to make carrying good easier. Sumerian city-states had different social groups. Nobles were the highest in status then the commoners and then the slaves. Many city-states wanted to take control of others and started war with them. The most famous and successful leaders of these wars was Hammurabi. Hammurabi gained control of many city-states. Hammurabi was a fair leader who gave peace to his empire. After his death however, his empire collapsed due to weak kings and strong invaders.…

    • 2240 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An empire is a major political unit having a territory of great extent or a number of territories or peoples under a single sovereign authority. Two very famous classical empires were the Roman in the Mediterranean from 27BCE to 476CE and the Han in East Asia from 206BCE to 220CE. Both of these empires utilize the policies and practices of previous political governments to help ensure their success. Overall, the empires showed more political, economic, and social factors for their rise and fall than points of difference.…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roman Vs Han

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty are some of the earliest empires that existed. They both lasted around four hundred years (Roman Empire lasted from around 37 B.C.- 476 A.D. and the Han Dynasty lasted from around 206 B.C.-220 A.D.). During this time these civilizations were the most powerful in the world. At their height, these empires had populations of around fifty million people, and they both covered approximately two million square miles. The Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty both sought to protect their trade routes (the Roman Empire had the Mediterranean and the Han Dynasty had the Silk Road). They protected their trade routes by expanding their empires into these territories. Both empires had economies based off of agriculture, so for them the more land they owned the wealthier the empire was. These empires also developed an infrastructure to make communication, access to resources, and movement of military much easier. The Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty both involved in economic activities that were designed to ensure a stable social and political order, and they used bureaucracy and taxation to provision major cities. Both were patriarchal societies where the father of the family had the most power.…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    | -empires included Sargon of Akkad, Hammurabi, Assyrian, and New Babylonian (Nebuchadnezzar)-kings, that normally ruled with local nobles-nobles were through birth in rich families; could not work way up-city-states to control public life within city walls and oversee affairs in surrounding agricultural regions-more cities than Nubia…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman and Han Comparison

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Roman Senate had executive power, while Han emperors presided over a centralized, bureaucratic government headed by a prime minister. As time progressed, empires became mixtures of previous empires� aspects of civilization.…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mesopotamia PERSIAN CHART

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mesopotamia was made up of city-states. It was one nation as a whole, but each city-state had it’s own government and own set of laws. City-states could also conquer one another for power and more territory.…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hi Analysis

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The economic advantages are that the empire is so big it bring a better economy the political advantage the more land the more power the political disadvantage they are so many people some will not agree with the ruler…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mesopotamia is often referred to as the first civilization in history. Named after it’s geographical location, “land between two rivers,” Mesopotamia was settled between the…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mesopotamia Vs Egypt

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Mesopotamian society was set up as city-states, where farming villages were connected to an urban are, ruled by a leader living in a palace in the city. This decentralized government is in sharp contrast with the centralized and divine leadership of the Egyptian ruler. The villages in Mesopotamia provided produce, and the urban area provided military protection and specialized goods. There were many city-states in Mesopotamia. The city-states often fought for control of resourses, but they also came together when large man power was needed as in building new irrigation systems. The geography of both Egyptian and Mesopotamian civilization helped to develop the religion, the political and economic environment of two great early civilizations. Mesopotamian civilization was comprised of city-states. Their society was divided into landowners, farmers/artisans/and slaves. With the importance of farming, the role of women diminished, since the men did the hard labor of plowing. Women were still allowed to own land at the time. The writing system in Mesopotamia, cuneiform, was controlled by male scribes. This dominance probably led to a further decline in the role of women in Mesopotamian society. Women were allowed to engage in trade, work outside their homes, and make baskets and clean their homes. Politics was off limits.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Olmec Essay

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3500 BC to 2332 BC, when the civilization fell under control of Sargon Akkad(Kleiner 40). The Sumerians settled in the previously inhabited valley between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers, in modern day southern Iraq(Kliener 32). This region, known as the Fertile Crescent was named for the quarter moon shape of the region. The unusually fertile soil allowed the early civilization to be able to focus on more than just farming for food to survive, as the Sumerians developed irrigation canals for crops, and learned to control the floods. Along with developments in agriculture, they charted the earliest urban societies, referred to as city-states that were surprisingly complex for the time period(Kliener 31). While urban, Sumer was not a unified populations. Instead, the multiple regions were under the rule of different deities, and the rulers were these gods’ representatives on Earth. The rulers controlled all communal activities, including agriculture and food distribution. As a result of extensive agriculture innovation, only a select portion of the population had to farm, allowing others to develop skills in a multitude of areas. This began the advent of the urbanized society, with the shift from family to community responsibilities(Kliener…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the very early days, before Christ, there were great, powerful empires. They built tall, beautiful buildings and temples. They rose to be the greatest empires ever. In my opinion, the best were the Ancient Egyptians and Mesopotamians. They were different in many ways, but had their similarities. (Mrs. Welsh)…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World Empires

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Throughout human history we have seen the rise and fall of many great cities and empires, through archeological records and remains of cites. Mostly all of the empires that we have record has impacted and influence our world today. The most noticeable empires that have the greatest influence on today’s world are the early great empires of the Hittites and Assyrians and the later empires of the Romans and Chinese in the 2nd half of the first millennium. However both the early and later empires differ in how they got power and established themselves in the world. Some factors that contributed to the rise of the Roman and Chinese empires were the political structure and military conquest.…

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Assyrians, Neo-Babylonians, and Persians are considered to be amongst the first successful civilizations of first millennium B.C. It can be argued that each civilization was better than the others in terms of treatment of common people, but that’s a issue for another essay. What we want to know right now is, why? What made their model of civilization more effective than that of previous empires?…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics