Preview

City States vs. Empires (Mesopotamia)

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
751 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
City States vs. Empires (Mesopotamia)
City-States vs. Empires

The first civilizations emerged thousands of years ago in a region in the Middle East called Mesopotamia. Around 4000 B.C.E, a group called the Sumerians invaded Mesopotamia and organized their civilization, Sumer, into many city-states. A city-state is a self-governing state that consists of a city and its surrounding territory. Some Sumerian city-states include Kish, Uruk, Lagash, and Ur. In these city-states, the Sumerians would develop a sense of culture and create new systems of writing, government, art, and religion that would impact future civilizations. The Sumerian city-states would soon be conquered by larger empires that wanted more land and wealth. An empire was more advantageous to the people of Mesopotamia because it was easier to defend from invasions, there was a stronger central government, and different products and technology were shared throughout the region.
An empire was more beneficial because there was more protection against attacks and invasions. The Sumerian city-states only governed and defended themselves which made them very weak compared to neighboring civilizations. The Sumerian civilization declined when the king of the Akkadian empire, Sargon, conquered the southern Mesopotamian region around 2350 B.C.E. After the Akkadians, the Babylonian empire took control of the region. Since the empires were large, powerful armies were created which prevented the civilization from being attacked. An empire’s army is stronger because there are more people working together and they have the same goal. The city-states didn’t communicate or work together to defeat other civilizations. The more civilizations eliminated, the less of a chance the empire will become a victim. An empire was more benevolent because it provided the people with more protection from neighboring civilizations. Empires were advantageous because they had strong, stable governments. A government’s main job is to prevent chaos and promote

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Mesopotamia was the first great civilization and was built along the Euphrates and Tigris Rivers and is now located in present day Iraq. This is the area that is called the Fertile Crescent because its geography and layout caused farming and urban areas. The people in this region were either considered Sumerians or Semitics which led to religion in which the people worshipped gods of nature and also imagined gods as anthropomorphic. The social structure of Mesopotamia was organized in social divisions which gave certain economic and political advantages to some and condemned others. Social structure was very much controlled by The Law Code of Hammurabi which gave the society three classes; the free landowning class, the class of dependant farmers, and the class of slaves. The economy of Mesopotamia was based on slaves and trade. The trading was kept track with a system of tokens which gave ownership of different items and also property. Much of the trade there was done by boat and includes the trading of bronze, clay, and cattle. This is very much how Mesopotamia lasted so long and is known as the first great civilization.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    | -empires included Sargon of Akkad, Hammurabi, Assyrian, and New Babylonian (Nebuchadnezzar)-kings, that normally ruled with local nobles-nobles were through birth in rich families; could not work way up-city-states to control public life within city walls and oversee affairs in surrounding agricultural regions-more cities than Nubia…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mesopotamia (The land between two rivers) is known as one of the oldest civilization ever found. It lay between two rivers; The Euphrates and the Tigris. These rivers flooded inconsistently causing fresh water to flow into their region. Sumer, located further southeast in Mesopotamia, was a very prospering city. It led to increase food supplies and that caused an increase in human population. Many Semitic (Arabs and Jewish) people migrated to Sumer, bringing with them their languages such as: Akkaidian, Aramaic, Hebrew and Phoenician. One of the first “Sumerian governments were probably assemblies of prominent men who made decisions on behalf of the whole community” (Bentley 28).…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mesopotamia PERSIAN CHART

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mesopotamia was made up of city-states. It was one nation as a whole, but each city-state had it’s own government and own set of laws. City-states could also conquer one another for power and more territory.…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mesopotamia is often referred to as the first civilization in history. Named after it’s geographical location, “land between two rivers,” Mesopotamia was settled between the…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hi Analysis

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The economic advantages are that the empire is so big it bring a better economy the political advantage the more land the more power the political disadvantage they are so many people some will not agree with the ruler…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The root of the differences between the Mesopotamian cultures lies within the politics. The two cultures operated very differently as Mesopotamia was ruled regionally while Egypt used a more centralized government. Kings in the Mesopotamian region formed city states ruled by leaders of their armies while they just oversaw what was going on via these mediums. On the other hand, Egyptian culture featured “god-kings” or pharaohs that controlled much larger expanses of land than Mesopotamian leaders did. Logically, it makes sense that this would occur because of the differences in influence for these two regions. For example, unification of Egypt was inspired by Sudan’s use of small kingdoms that governed the agriculture of the rulers. The Egyptians then faced competition which caused their small kingdoms to conquer neighboring kingdoms to the point where they controlled much larger territories. The notion of kings and pharaohs leads into another difference. Mesopotamian societies featured monarchies as they were led by kings while Egyptians had a theocracy as pharaohs were divine rulers. In Mesopotamia it is figured that their monarchs evolved from men making decisions on behalf of their whole…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    World History AP

    • 8777 Words
    • 36 Pages

    Are you more impressed with the “greatness” of empires or with their destructive and oppressive features? Why?…

    • 8777 Words
    • 36 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Others may argue that the advancement in war weapons and strategies allowed for survival of the fittest civilizations and let the way to conquering and expanding civilizations and technology, but I disagree. I believe it is the empire that showed the most compassion and justice that has allowed us to truly thrive as a society.…

    • 346 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mesopotamia was about 300 miles long and 150 miles wide. It was located between two rivers, the Euphrates and Tigris Rivers. The word Mesopotamia itself means "The land between two rivers". With this, Mesopotamia depended on the cultivation of the land for survival. As Mesopotamia began to develop there were city-states that were established. These city-states were surrounded by a mud brick wall and farmland. Sumerians would take great pride in their city-state, and that created chaos. At times wars would break out to prove which city-state was the strongest. Each city-state had a priest-king to rule over their people. However, their beliefs were polytheistic and centered their beliefs in four Gods that represented power. These Gods provided for mankind and every year the Sumerians believed that the Gods would decide their faith. During the time between 2700 ca. and 2600ca. there was a ruler who ran the city-state of Uruk, Gilgamesh the famously known king who was two-thirds God and one third-man. On the other hand, during the time of Roland their civilization was ran by one king known as Charlemagne, who believed in monotheism and that Christianity was the one true religion. During this reign Charlemagne was anointed as the head of the Roman Empire. Their goal as a society was based on conquering cities to convert them to Christianity. Both our epic heroes are from different eras in time that may have contributed to their actions; however, as contradictory as their civilizations were they share distinctions and parallels in their character.…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Assyrians, Neo-Babylonians, and Persians are considered to be amongst the first successful civilizations of first millennium B.C. It can be argued that each civilization was better than the others in terms of treatment of common people, but that’s a issue for another essay. What we want to know right now is, why? What made their model of civilization more effective than that of previous empires?…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rome Essay Question

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages

    My plan is to take the main examples provided for why each is successful and format it as follows: Roman Republic, Roman Empire, both, hit on other civilizations, misc. I’m planning to link examples that explain how other emperors didn’t do what Rome did correctly directly with my fact on what Rome did do correct. As far as the second half of the question goes I am planning on taking what I have on each empire and try to make references to them during my arguments above. Tom L. was emphasizing Assyria during his explanation of this response. I listed some main points to hit on for every civilization below. Then with the remaining information I’m planning on just picking and choosing whatever fits. If you want me to send a list of my sources or an unrefined copy of my original notes let me know, it is kind of a cluster fuck but has some other background information.…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman and Han Comparison

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Roman Senate had executive power, while Han emperors presided over a centralized, bureaucratic government headed by a prime minister. As time progressed, empires became mixtures of previous empires� aspects of civilization.…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    empire might have been strong, but they weren't a unified type of empire. Even though…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civilization. The word “civilization” comes from the Latin term for “city.” The first civilizations were the river-valley civilizations, so-called because they all developed alongside major rivers to secure an adequate water supply for agricultural production. 2 of the greatest river-valley civilizations were Mesopotamia and Egypt. All though they both supported having a patriarchal leader or king, Egypt had a strong, centralized government, whereas Mesopotamia was decentralized, and built based on small city-states operating independently.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics