Preview

Choice Theories

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
323 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Choice Theories
Robin Wake
10/24/12
Choice Theories
Madoff was a master thief and financier. In 2008, he revealed that the asset management arm of his firm, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities, was "just one big lie". In what he described as a Ponzi scheme, he took his investors for $65 billion over the course of two decades. The scheme wasn't revealed until Madoff himself confessed his crimes (How Ponzi Schemes Work).
I believe this is based on the rational choice theory. For example, a drug addict may know there are thousands rotting in prison for what they’re about to do, but they will get high anyway. It’s the same for a thief, a rapist, and pedophile. An offender’s wants or needs are in the present, the consequences are no more than an afterthought. “What’s the payoff” and “what are the chances of getting away with it” (Madoff sentence misses the point). Madoff obviously knew what he was doing was bad, but kept his “business” going for more than 20 years. Another example that shows rational theory is Madoff's investment empire spent decades taking money from clients on the promise of large returns that he knew they weren’t going to get. Instead of investing the money, he used deposits from new clients to pay out false profits to existing investors (The Guardian).
A choice theory I can personally relate to is general deterrence. I got pulled over today in Hampton. I was going ten mph over the speed limit because my daughter was hungry and crying. I rather speed a little bit so I can get home sooner to feed my daughter. I would never excessively speed with my daughter, but if the speed limit is twenty-five and I’m going thirty-five, at that time, getting home outweighed going the speed limit. I wasn’t thinking about the consequence at the time, but ten minutes later, I got handed an eighty dollar

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    First, Bernard Madoff started a stock trading business in 1960 that was highly successful. This business consisted of buying and selling stocks that were not on the New York Stock Exchange. Conversely, once Pete Madoff came into the business, Bernard created the investment management business, which is where the fraud occurred. Bernard was a respected businessperson that served on boards and even created his own foundation. In the financial industry, Bernard Madoff was a powerful person with several…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rational choice theory teaches that a person will look at a current situation and decide that an immediate need must be met through illegal action. For example, a normally law abiding citizen is watching his or her family go hungry. To meet the feeding need of his or her family, that person will break the law and steal. Because the benefit (not starving to death) outweighs the risk of being caught.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The rational choice theory is a logically consistent model that claims that a criminal will make a conscious choice to commit a crime, but only if the benefit of committing the crime outweighs the cost. I believe in some cases that criminals are a product of their environment and some criminals are even created due to mental illness. But I mostly believe in the choice theory. From the time we are born, we are taught the difference between right and wrong. Parents, relatives, and other authoritative figures in our lives play a direct role in the path to becoming an adult. These same people are a part of what we consider…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arming Law-Abiding Theory

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rational choice theory would suggest that these conditions force the criminal to weigh the probabilities of success in committing crime against the probability…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    CIS 170

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    They are many Criminal Theories from Psychological theories, social theories, deterrence theories and a few more but let focus on, Choice Theory, known as, rational choice theory. People will engage in delinquents and criminal behavior after weighting consequences and benefits of their actions. According to this review in, motivated people, after consideration, will commit crime if they believe that it will provide immediate benefits without the threat of long-term risk (David, et al, 2006). If people have a choice to do crime or do the right thing, why do they choose crime? What causes a person to choice crime? Poverty, conventional life styles, environment, social life, preexisting physical conditions, genetics or theirs past childhood. Many explanation can be an argument and it cause go on, and on.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ray Rice Criminology

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Beccaria proposed that people weigh the costs and benefits to see if the crime is worth committing. Now to prevent crime from occurring he proposed that through the act of punishment, potential criminals will realize that the costs outweigh the benefits and therefore not worth it. This idea became very popular as scholars discovered his texts. A part of classical theory, rational choice theory can be used in explaining that all people are able to commit a crime if the right opportunity arises (Bernard et al.,…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The rational choice theory says that we are choosing to commit a crime (Schmalleger, 2011). For example, a person has very little income and has a bill due. This person sits back and thinks of ways to come up with the money. Ultimately this person decides the only way to get the money is to commit robbery. Using the rational choice theory this person chose to commit the crime and must now deal with the consequences. The rational choice theory also states that the person who chooses to commit the crime feels the gain from the crime is far better than the repercussions of ignoring the law (Schmalleger, 2011). The rational choice theory is part of neoclassical criminology. Neoclassical criminology says that we are the ones who choose to commit crimes or choose to abide by the law (Schmalleger, 2011).…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Successful millionaire, Wall Street celebrity and esteemed philanthropist who ran the largest Ponzi scheme turned in by his own children. Some of the laws he broke include: securities fraud, wire fraud, money laundering and mail fraud among others. As a result of his scheme and disregard for the law many people were affected and lost their savings and retirement plans. The consequence to his actions: life in prison and all of his belongings auctioned off by the U.S. government.…

    • 1915 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The term choice theories better yet known as rational choice theories were developed by DR William Glasser in 1995. In Doctor Glasser’s theories he explains human desire to satisfy their genetic needs one has in order to survive. These desires cause humans to make conscious choices and act upon them in any way they decide to ensure the needed desires are satisfied. These theories relate to criminal activity because criminals feel that crime is their only way of fulfilling these desires. The need to survive is a primal instinct shared by all humans. When a person breaks a law, their offense becomes criminal and this affects society through costly trials, the need for more corrections, and housing; thus impacting the economy in a negative way.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bernie Madoff was a successful businessman, who built his business with an investment of five thousand dollars and ran his business using Ponzi schemes. His Ponzi schemes are what made him acquire so many investors and make billions. As crooked and illegal as Bernie Madoff's actions might've been he found a way to still strike as an iconic and incredibly successful business man. Bernie Madoff made it seem like if you didn't have a connection to him then your name was unheard of. The only way you were able to be let into his "community" was by having special connections. He created this need of acceptance by having a high confidence level and strong communication skills to make people buy into his hype. His motivation was off of the pure greed of the green papers of North America; money. His…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are many ethical issues in the world’s news today, some bigger than others, and many that get swept under the rug. One particular ethical issue is at the core of a huge story that has dominated the news for months on end and has lead to more trying times on Wall Street. The story is about Bernie Madoff and the massive effect he and his ponzi scheme had on hundreds of people who trusted him. This paper will discuss the ethical issue underlying the conflict, the damage that resulted from it, and the leadership that acted to counter suit his disaster. Bernie Madoff’s ponzi scheme is sure to go down in history as one of the largest business scandals ever and should make every person stop and make sure there ethics are in check.…

    • 1519 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    William Glasser

    • 1780 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Choice theory provides an explanation of motivation which is markedly different from what many of…

    • 1780 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bernie Madoff was a thief, plain and simple. He was a greedy, selfish, self-indulgent con artist, no different from any other grifter that you meet, except because of who he was, he was able to pull the con off on a grander scale. Madoff used his name and position and the legitimacy of his first business to draw people into his Ponzi scheme (like a pyramid scheme where one takes money from newer clients to pay older clients). He misrepresented (the kinder word) or lied (if you want the truthful description) to his friends and clients from the beginning and as later documented in his allocution, he never invested any of the money he got. It would have been different if this scheme formed from some bad business decisions and he did this in response to that and was trying to save some of his client’s money, but it wasn’t. Madoff originally provided his clients the 10-12% returns on investment that he offered, but it appears that with the increase in funds, the persons that benefitted the most from the Ponzi scheme was Madoff and his family. They all shared in an expensive and lavish lifestyle bordering on the garish with its excesses. He appeared to hire incompetent people so no one would be the wiser to what he was doing which was a disservice to his clientele. He also appeared to have used some of his misbegotten gains and infused them into his legitimate business therefore, putting it at risk. Nepotism was rampant in Madoff’s business which is why many people believe his family had to be involved more than just the sons and the confession of the scheme.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Furthermore, rational choice theory is useful in trying to explain and understand why human trafficking and forced labor occurs. According to this theory, the decision-making process of rationality is what determines the opportunities taken after weighing the costs, anticipated benefits and risk of committing these crimes. The perpetuators from the case outweighed the consequences from their crimes with the benefits and decided to execute them anyway. This theory is both offender and offense specific, and suggests that there are also crime-specific decisions made. It vies the needs and demands choices from both offender and offense as crime specific and focuses on the prevention of individual crime types.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I can think of these examples that the Rational Choice Theory is applied: my membership in GMA’s Multi-Purpose Cooperative and participation in various volunteer activities. Cooperative I have joined GMA’s Multi-Purpose Cooperative since 2002 recognizing the optimum benefits from my savings versus the traditional bank savings deposit. Saving through COOP seems unfelt because it is deducted from our salary. It yields a much higher interest rate than bank. Besides, the total contribution can be withdrawn anytime without withholding tax; hence, it is readily available if needed, which is the very essence of savings. Our COOP has been giving annual cash dividends, the total profits from all its investments divided to its members based on our individual capital. Higher contribution means higher dividends. Because of this, I already maximized my monthly contribution so I can optimize what I can get out of my money. So far, dividends have been ranging from 6-8% per annum, much higher than banks. Other benefit that we enjoy through COOP is the cash or gadget/appliance loans, with adjustable terms of payment plus certain rebates. If I don’t apply for a loan, I still enjoy certain benefit from this activity i.e., the interests of those who availed of the loan are earnings of the COOP and COOP earnings mean mine and all other members. Recent additions to the benefits include college scholarships for dependents and insurance. These particular items I haven’t enjoyed yet but I feel secured that someday, I will be able to avail of these because of COOP. Aside from all of these, I can also build a strong social network together with several (if not all) COOP members. People connection is of course a lifetime benefit. Hence, joining COOP gives me both financial and social advantages. With the help of other members, I am able to optimize the value of my savings, something…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays