Preview

Chapters 6 And 7 Module 2

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1747 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Chapters 6 And 7 Module 2
Yinka Jackson
PHI2010­785622

1)
Explain and evaluate Rene Descartes argument for knowledge including the role of skepticism, the

evil demon, and god in resolving his doubts.
Descartes's believed he could doubt everything that could be doubted, and the remainder was be the absolute certain. He utilized skepticism as a means to achieve certainty. To doubt every proposition he utilized the dream and evil demon conjectures. It was questionable whether he was dreaming, or was it actually realty. By trying to prove himself awake, during the time in which he was actually dreaming.
During the evil demon conjecture,he brought to question whether a demon wishing to deceive at every turn; having brung about uncertainty in proposition what be found to be truth or false. It is impossible to doubt your existence, because you must exist to simply question it.
Descartes believed what he perceived clearly and distinctly is that God would be the cause for his hand to move freely, not his mind. As God is the divine coordinator. He disconnected metaphysical through
“what is”, and brought other philosophers to become divided about the power of reason in overcoming skepticism. 2)
Explain and evaluate Thomas Hobbes view that all objects are material, including thoughts, feelings and ideas.
Hobbes believed that all things are made up of material pieces, and that all change reduces to motion i.e bodies in motion. He attempted to show “perception” where all other mental phenomena are derived , and how the perception reduces the matter in motion. The things that are real outside of us, are the motions by which they are caused. Adding that thinking was a sequence of memory or imagination. 3)
Explain and evaluate John Locke’s Theory of Representative Realism and of primary and secondary qualities. Locke believed that all of our ideas come from experience. He notes that our minds begin as a blank slate, and as we progress through life

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    John Locke was best known as an advocate of empiricism and for his belief of tabula rasa, or the blank slate. In this way his beliefs were similar to those of the behaviorist school of thought. Locke is known as the father of English Empiricism. Empiricism believes that everyone is born with a blank slate that we fill as we experience life. The knowledge that we gain throughout life is due to our experiences, not through reasoning or thought. Locke believed that there is only the capacity to have ideas in the mind, not to be born with them. He states that all knowledge of the world comes from the experience we have within it, through our perceptions and senses. According the empiricism, every thought that we have is influenced by an experience that we have had. Essentially, according to Locke’s view and empiricism, the only way to know the truth about something is to actually experience it through our senses.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes talked about ideas being derived from sensation and how people see an object and it causes a pressure on the sense organ. Hobbes described this as a resistance. Hobbes also believed that colors abide in the perceives and not in the objects themselves. In other words, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Hobbes described many ideas in The Elements of Law.…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes believed that everyone was basically selfish beings who would do anything to benefit their own personal position, and if left alone would act upon evil impulses. He believed this to be…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to understand what ‘I’ is, he considers the things which came spontaneously into his mind when he first considered the question. His first thought is that he had a body – “That I had a face, hands, arms and the whole mechanical structure of limbs which can be seen in a corpse.” He gives the ‘I’ several characteristics – nourishment, movement, sense-perception and thinking. He attributes these to the soul and imagines this to be made of some tenuous substance like wind or ether which permeates his body. By body he means “whatever has a determinable shape and definable location and can occupy a space in such a way to exclude any other body; it can perceive by touch, sight, hearing, taste or smell and can be moved in various ways, not by itself but by whatever else comes into contact with it.” He contends that the power of self-movement, sensation and thought is foreign to the nature of the body.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes Knowledge

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages

    our existence in reality is a question which philosophers have tackled throughout time. This essay will look at the…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mach believes humans think in an economical manner where past experiences and knowledge are systematically reorganized to fit a pattern (Mach 211). Rather than analysing each experience in detail, humans refer to similar or related experiences as groups, which allows for the “least expenditure of thought” (Mach 197). In line with this mentality springs the concept of ‘things’ and ‘bodies’. Mach states that colours, sounds, temperatures, etc. are called sensations (Mach 208-209). When certain sensations are present repeatedly, they would fit into a pattern. To allow for future reference on this knowledge within the mind, the pattern receives a label. An example would be when a person sees an orange, bouncy, sphere object which has a mildly rough texture, the label ‘basketball’ springs to mind. The ‘basketball’ would not be a physical object; it would simply be a “mental symbol” for the sensations and Mach states that “symbols do not exist outside of thought” (Mach 201).…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the start of the meditation, Descartes begins by rejecting all his beliefs, so that he would not be deceived by any misconceptions from reaching the truth. Descartes acknowledges himself as, "a thing that thinks: that is, a thing that doubts, affirms, denies, understands a few things, is ignorant of many things" He is certain that that he thinks and exists because his knowledge and ideas are both ‘clear and distinct'. Descartes proposes a general rule, "that whatever one perceives very clearly and very distinctly is true" Descartes discovers, "that he can doubt what he clearly and distinctly perceives is true led to the realization that his first immediate priority should be to remove the doubt" because, "no organized body of knowledge is possible unless the doubt is removed" The best probable way to remove the doubt is prove that God exists, that he is not a deceiver and "will always guarantee that any clear and distinct ideas that enter our minds will be true." Descartes must remove the threat of an invisible demon that inserts ideas and doubts into our minds to fool us , in order to rely on his ‘clear and distinct' rule.…

    • 1969 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In philosophy there are a number of different views when it comes to the mind/body problem. The mind/body problem is the problem of explaining how the mind relates to the body. One of these views is called dualism. Dualists utilize Leibniz’s law to support their argument that the mind and body are two different things. On the other hand there is also another group of philosophers called physicalists. Physicalists claim that everything including psychological aspects are tangible and they use a concept called modes of presentation to support their beliefs against dualism. In this paper I will be further explaining Leibniz’s law and how it is used by dualism. I will also go into the modes of presentation concept and how physicalists use it as a response to dualism.…

    • 1317 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The world we live in is often taken to be the direct cause of all of our sense experience and this common sense approach is rarely given a second thought. However, upon reflection the experiential process of acquiring and interpreting sense data is complex and still under discussion. John Locke proposed the idea that our minds are born in a state of Tabula Rasa and therefore all knowledge must be gained through experience. Although Locke proposed that are minds are blank at birth he did not succumb to the Naive realist theory that our minds experience the world directly. For Locke, our experiences are more convoluted and involve different qualities to explain the relationship between our minds and the external reality. Inspired by the scientific theories of Robert Boyle, Locke follows from the Corpuscular theory by trying to express external reality in terms of particles, the smallest components of matter. The primary qualities according to Locke are made up of five properties: shape, extension, solidity, motion, number. Secondary properties are dependent on primary qualities and act as a “power” in creating the sense experiences of colour, smell, sound, texture and taste in the mind, thus bridging the gap between mind and body thereby satisfying Locke’s dualistic views. However, the distinction Locke makes comes under attack from many angles. Berkley argues that the distinction is impossible to comprehend and we should therefore refrain from attempting to look behind the view of perception and accept that we can’t refer to things beyond the mental. If Berkley’s rebuttal has understood Locke’s proposal correctly and tenability is dependent on comprehension, the distinction Locke makes between primary and secondary qualities must be deemed untenable.…

    • 1610 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Role of God in Descartes

    • 1464 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Descartes presents the possibility that he might be living a dream, but then realizes that there are such things as clear and distinct ideas. The one thing that Descartes cannot doubt is the fact that he doubts. Doubting is a form of thinking, thus he must be a thinking thing. Therefore, he must exist. This is the new foundation – “I think, therefore I am.” Everything else in his argument is based on the “I think,” but as a consequence, all the world consists of is Descartes’ mind and nothing else. This is a radical doubt. The new Cartesian foundation is not a metaphysical one, it is an epistemological one – the self, “I think.” Descartes has res cogitans – the idea that he is a thinking thing. He now brings about the criterion for truth, being that any clear and distinct idea is true. Sensing and imagining are forms of thinking, but unlike intellection or rational thought, they are confused forms of thinking, where intellect and rational are clear and distinct. The next thing he has to prove so he is not alone in the universe is God.…

    • 1464 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hobbes essentially believes that one must discover how the natural person functions to determine what type of government should be put in place and how man can accomplish its formation. He therefore begins Leviathan by arguing that every aspect of humanity can be explained through materialistic principles, because man consists simply of matter in motion. Hobbes believes individuals are born as blank slates and the knowledge man achieves of the world is derived from external bodies pressing against him. This constant motion occurring internally in each man eventually transfers to the surface of their body creating senses, which in turn relays messages to the brain and forms opinions and imagination. Hobbes believes we are driven by our passions and desires, which means man is essentially a bundle of all his passions in constant motion. An important aspect of this is that once a thing is in motion it will eternally be in motion until an outside force acts upon it. The fact that these bundles of passion are in constant motion until an…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philosophy Epistemology

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Epistemology is one of the very important branches of philosophy. It is also known as the knowledge theory. The knowledge theory consists of three questions; “What is the origin of knowledge? What is the reliability of knowledge? & What is the criteria of knowledge?” Rene Descartes and John Locke really looked into epistemology and both had different theories to approach it. John Locke looked at empiricism and Rene Descartes looked at rationalism.…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes decided to believe in nothing that he could not discern as clearly and distinctly true. Descartes imagined the possibility of a mischievous demon, who disordered reality in order to deceive humans that anything was possible if he could not prove that it wasn’t the case.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    5. Founded the idea that the mind is a tabula rasa, or blank sheet, and experiences write on it. _________ Locke…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Human Nature Human beings are physical objects, according to Hobbes, sophisticated machines all of whose functions and activities can be described and explained in purely mechanistic terms. Even thought itself, therefore, must be understood as an instance of the physical operation of the human body. Sensation, for example, involves a series of mechanical processes operating within the human nervous system, by means of which the sensible features of material things produce ideas in the brains of the human beings who perceive them. (Leviathan I 1) Human action is similarly to be explained on Hobbes's view.…

    • 8388 Words
    • 34 Pages
    Good Essays