1. Do you agree that the Bible is a divine-human book? Why or why not?
Yes, I agree that the Bible is a divine-human book. Obviously humans wrote the different “books” of the Bible. And in their respected books they claim that this holy book is by the inspiration of the Holy Spirit of God. Thus you have a divine-human book, though it’s the divine that gives it true value and importance.
2. What is textual criticism? How is it possible to have a high view of the authority of the Scripture and a positive view of textual criticism at the same time?
Textual criticism is a discipline that focuses on bringing about “the most accurate text possible based upon available manuscript evidence. God’s sovereignty! I trust my God, who brought His Word to us through the first human authors, to keep His Word faithful for us through the succeeding scribes and translators.
3. What is a Bible translation? Why is translation not a simple exercise? Describe the two main approaches to translation discussed in this chapter. Which approach do you feel most comfortable with? Why?
The reproducing “of a text that is in one language (the source language), as fully as possible, in another (the receptor language). Because translating one language into another language is not as easy as copying one language word-for-word into another language, especially from copies and without the original authors present for assistance. The “more formal” approach (word-for-word) and the “more functional” approach (thought-for-thought). The “more formal” approach tries to stay as close as possible to the original in structure and words. The “more functional” tries to stay as close as possible in expressing the meaning of the original text though in today’s language. I feel most comfortable with both. I think both are needed in trying to get a more holistic understanding and picture.
Now what other belief/religion can put their "holy book" through this type of scrutiny? None of them. Christianity, not its false offshoots (i.e. Jehovah Witness, Christian Science, Mormons, Black Israelites, etc), is the most solid and vetted belief. This gives Jesus Christ and His claims more and more credence. Thus, the remarks that the Christian Faith is foolish, is foolish.
1. a. dynamis or δύναμιν
c. Acts 1:8, 3:12, 4:7, 4:33
d. Acts 2:22, 6:8, 8:13, 19:11
2. a. yod
c. Exodus 7:19, 15:9, 15:17, 29:9, 29:10
3. No. They have three different meanings.
4. a. 42
9-2 1. 3309
2. merimnaō used 19 times
3. Take thought--11 times
5. a. life, food, drink, clothing, height, tomorrow.
b. Matthew 10:19 and Luke 12:11 are about being arrested for doing what Jesus commanded.
c. Martha fussed over superficial things whereas her sister was more concerned with the eternal.
d. It has to do with male and female relationships and dominance.
6. Concern and fear
Explain the difference between reader response and authorial intent.
Reader Response is when the meaning is determined by the reader or a community of readers. This also means that it is the reader who defines any meaning, because every reader will get something different from the text. This is when the reader asks, "What does this mean to me?" This can have negative and positive effects. If the reader was to take this approach with an objective law, then the reader will soon suffer negative consequences. If the reader was to take this approach with a suggestive song and ignore the innuendos, then the reader (depending on the individual's morals and values) would enjoy listening to the song. This of course, only works if the reader enjoyed music, in the first place.
Authorial intent basically means that when the writer of a written work wrote the piece he had a specific meaning in mind. Some believe that we can ascribe...