Preview

Ch 5 Gov

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
968 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ch 5 Gov
Ch.5 Reading Questions – Civil Liberties

1. How do civil liberties often involve a conflict between different liberties?

Civil liberties are basic rights given to everybody. It often involves conflict because discrimination exists between people of different race or gender and some people don’t think different people deserve the same civil liberties, even though civil liberties should be the same for every human being

2. Read the textbook and the handout on the incorporation doctrine and write a definition of incorporation clarifying the concept in your own words as well as explaining the role of the 14th Amendment in incorporation. What is selective incorporation?

Incorporation in opening your business or actions to other people and letting them be involved in your work. Selective incorporation is where you get to choose who becomes involved but they are involved nonetheless.

3. List and explain the circumstances when the Supreme Court has ruled that freedom of speech may be limited.

Freedom of speech is limited when it puts others in danger, for instance yelling fire at a movie theater

4. Explain briefly how the Supreme Court has interpreted the Free Exercise and Establishment clauses.

The Supreme Court usually interprets free exercise very loosely, and let lots of people do lots of things. However, sometimes a bar is lowered because the crime committed is so far out of the realm of normality.

5. What are the difficulties in using the “wall of separation” principle?

Sometimes putting a wall between religion and government can anger a few people but it is nothing compared to what would’ve happened without it

6. What is the purpose of the exclusionary rule? What are the exceptions to it that the Supreme Court has recognized?

The exclusionary rule is a legal principle in the United States, under constitutional law, which holds that evidence collected or analyzed in violation of the defendant's constitutional rights is sometimes inadmissible for a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Civil liberties and civil rights are fundamental for everyday living. In today’s society both of these terms have different prospective; civil rights are considered to be natural rights. In other words, civil rights means that people have the right to be treated the same regardless of their race, gender, or religion. Even thought civil rights are guaranteed by law, this prospective took many years to be achieved. For example, after the Civil War African and Americans were still treated badly; they got the worst jobs and were paid poorly. On the other hand, civil liberties are “Rights in freedom that protect an individual from the government” (Welch 404). Most civil liberties are found in the bill of rights; which are the first ten amendments of the constitution.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    THESIS: The first amendment of the constitution of the United States protects our right to freedom of speech. However, the freedom to speak should not entitle the speaker to purposely hurt another person by revealing private matters or spreading rumors and lies.…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ap Nsl

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages

    7. Summarize the Supreme Court’s changing interpretations of how to protect both the due process rights of accused criminals and to preserve the safety of the community.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ayy lmao

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages

    III. The History of the case being appealed to the Supreme Court and the decisions of the lower courts…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The legal principle established by the exclusionary rule is embodied in the United States of America Constitution and relates to the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. The Fourth Amendment protects the people by prohibiting illegal searches and seizures. The Fourteenth Amendment ensures offenders are afforded their rights to due process in a criminal trial according to the law. The exclusionary rule also applies to the Fifth Amendment, which protect the people against self incrimination when charged with an offense by a government officer. Furthermore, the rule applies to interrogations where the offender is often pressured by officers to confess to their crimes. In turn, the rule also applies to the Sixth Amendment that ensures every offender has the right to have legal counsel. Ultimately, the rule greatly influences the credibility of any evidence gathered, by government officers, for use in the prosecution of an accused offender. If the evidence presented to the court is found to have been collected in violation of the rule it may be suppressed in any federal or state court.…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are now limitations of free speech that were not put in place before because they have evolved as a problem of our society in this day and age. These limitations that "Fall outside of its protection are obscenity, child pornography, defamation, incitement to violence and true threats of violence," (Richards) "Even in those categories, there are tests that have to be met in order for the speech to be illegal. Beyond that, we are free to speak" (Richards). The Supreme Court of the United States of America fully supports and condones the First Amendment in all aspects and cases that don’t fall under any of these categories. This law is held to the highest importance because our country is run off of the human rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness and without freedom to have a voice this would not exist. The limitations are set in place, but when the Founding Fathers passed this Amendment they wanted absolute freedom of speech, as they felt there should be no limits on what can be said and not said. Everyone has a voice or at least that’s how it started off. Present day issues, such as the items listed above, shouldn’t create a limitation on what can and cannot be said. That’s why we live in a free country unlike any in the world.…

    • 1792 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The exclusionary rule is a law that prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in a criminal trial. The U.S. Supreme Court developed the rule to discourage police from violating the Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. A lot of police feel as when they have their badge on there able to do anything and everything which isn't fair to the everyday citizen.…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Contitution Net. (2010). A description of the United States constitution. Retrieved September 23, 2010, from www.usconsitution.net: http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Exclusionary Rule

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 1914, during the Supreme Court case Weeks versus the United States, the exclusionary rule was established (Hendrie 1). The exclusionary rule was a part of the Fourth Amendment. It states that evidence found at a crime scene is not admissible if it was not found under the correct procedures. This means that the government cannot conduct illegal searches of a person or place and use evidence that is found at that time. The government must go through the procedures of obtaining warrants or have probable cause to search an individual or place. The exclusionary rule is used to provide civil rights for individuals and restricts powers of the local and federal government (Lynch 1).…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Richards, David A. J. “Melville B. Nimmer Symposium: Article: A Theory of Free Speech” UCLA Law Review, 1987…

    • 2295 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Among the arguments in support of the exclusionary rule4 by its proponents are the following:…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The exclusionary rule is an important doctrine supporting the ideals of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution. The Fourth Amendment provides people under the jurisdiction of the American criminal justice system protections from unreasonable searches and seizures. The amendment also delineates the methods members of the criminal justice system may obtain information via judicially sanctioned search warrants based on probable cause. The exclusionary rule exempts some evidence even when the seizure or location of the evidence may violate the Fourth Amendment. The rule also provides some benefits and detriments for members of the criminal justice system when gathering evidence or prosecuting offenders. However, the exclusionary rule is an important doctrine to members of the criminal justice system demonstrating a means to introduce evidence in the furtherance of justice.…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mapp V. Ohio Case Study

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Justice Black also believes the command that no unreasonable searches or seizures be allowed is too little to infer such a large decision. With these differences aside Justice Black feels that along with previous court decisions that the "Fourth Amendment's ban against unreasonable searches and seizures is considered together with the Fifth Amendment's ban against compelled self-incrimination, a constitutional basis emerges which not only justifies, but actually requires the exclusionary…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    United States.[9] In Weeks, the Court suppressed evidence that was unlawfully obtained by federal officers and introduced into a federal prosecution. The Court addressed two concerns that were accomplished by suppressing unlawfully seized evidence. First, the remedy would enable courts to fulfill their obligatory duty of giving effect to the Fourth Amendment right.[10] In the unanimous opinion, Justice Day explained that without the remedy of suppression, “the protection of the 4th Amendment… is of no value.”[11] Weeks emphasized the “great principles” of the Constitution and expressed an unwillingness to sacrifice these fundamental rights to aid the conviction of one criminal.[12] The exclusionary rule was thus conceived as a necessary adjunct to the Fourth Amendment right…

    • 4459 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Exclusionary rule is a judicially created rule that prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in a criminal prosecution (Sheb and Sheb 503). It became known in 1914 after a Supreme Court case Weeks vs United States. The Supreme Court ruled that the rule was rational because police cannot illegaly do searches and…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays