Preview

Ccj V Privy Council

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
322 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ccj V Privy Council
• The creation of a new court is one of the most important decisions for Jamaica. Jamaican citizens have the right to appeal to the Privy Council in criminal, civil or Constitutional matters.
• The Government of Jamaica proposes to take away your right of appeal to the Privy Council and replace it with a new court called the Caribbean Court of Justice • A process of public education and debate is essential and the public must be involved in making the final decision.
• We don't know how much the Caribbean Court of Justice will cost. We know the Government has to borrow the money to set it up, and Jamaica is carrying too much debt as it is. The Privy Council gives its services at no cost to the Public Purse.
• A final court of appeal should be permanent. However members may withdraw from the Caribbean Court of Justice by giving 3 years notice
• Concerns remain about the full independence of the President of the Court, his/her special prominence and the security of tenure of the judges, which are absolutely critical factors.
• The judges of the Privy Council are entirely free from any interference or pressure from politicians in Jamaica or the Caribbean
• The atrocious state of our courts is a national disgrace. How can we talk about funding a new Caribbean Court, when our own courts are dilapidated, and lack basic amenities such as proper toilets? We must put our own house in order first. Justice should begin at home.
• Whether you support the establishment of a Caribbean Court of Justice or not, it is your right to express your opinion, and it is the Government’s duty to ask us if and when or whether we choose to replace the Privy Council as our Final Court of Appeal.
• The Government should not remove the right of appeal to the Privy Council without a referendum.

The Government should not alter our

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The independence of the judiciary from the executive and legislative is said to kept by things like their fixed salaries and sub judice rule. Their salaries ‘are paid from the Consolidated Fund’ and aren’t fixed or changeable by Parliament or the government which keeps the judiciary free from political pressure in terms of finance. The sub judice rule is where the MPs in the House of Commons are unable to comment on current or pending cases. This keeps the judiciary free from political interference and prevents prejudice against judicial decisions. This rule is followed by ministers and civil servants too. Judges are said to be kept neutral because they lack politically ‘partisan activity’ as they don’t comment on ‘matters of public policy’ and avoid siding with different party governments. Another way the judiciary has been made increasingly independent and neutral is the changed position of the Lord Chancellor following the ‘2005 Constitutional Reform Act as he was previously the ‘head of the judiciary, the presiding officers of the House of Lords and a member of the Cabinet’. This Act removed his judicial role and transferred it to the Lord Chief Justice while also separating the ‘law lords’ from the House of Lords via the ‘establishment of a new Supreme Court’ in 2009. This again, separates the judiciary from the legislature and executive which enhances independence and neutrality.…

    • 2833 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Furthermore, the freedom of the judiciary brach to set precedents equal in importance to the law, especially on the controversial issues mentioned in the C.C.R.F., actually diminishes Canada’s democratic nature. Because they are not elected, judges do not have to be sensitive to the will of the…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    An independent judiciary is Significant as it results in a justice system that is not influenced by either the legislative or executive branch. Moreover it is free to make decisions based upon law and not upon the pressure forced from other groups. The quote "It is vitally important in a democracy that individual judges and the judiciary as a whole are impartial and independent of all external pressures and of each other (Baroness Butler-Sloss–May 2012) visibly condenses this.…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    By making decisions regarding the interest of the society the courts assume responsibilities that belong exclusively to the legislative and executive branches of government. The Supreme Court justices may rule based on what is in their best interest while saying that they are deciding for the good of the society. Moreover, when the Supreme Court justices are appointed, not elected, they may not be the representatives of the public’s view. As a result, judges begin making policy decisions about social or political changes society should make and become “unelected legislators.” By freely interpreting the meaning of the Constitution, the communities’ confidence in the Supreme Court will be undermined. When judicial activism in the Supreme Court wields too much power, it can eventually destruct the essence of…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judges represent an important central role in adjudicating disputes in a fair, unbiased manner by applying legal rules and play a vital role in controlling the exercise of power by the state. Judges may leave their position by the termination of an appointment: Dismissal due to breaching judicial disciplines, resignation of their own choice or suggestion by the Lord Chancellor for misbehaviour, removal due to disability by permanent infirmity from performance of duties and retirement at the age of 70 under the Judicial Pensions and Retirement Act 1993.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    References: American Bar Association (2009) Guide to Court Reform and the Role of Court Personnel: A Guide for USAID Democracy and Governance Workers. [report] Washington: USAID. Bakken, T. (2007) Courts, Prosecution and the Defense. In: Siegel, L. and Senna, J. eds. (2007) Essentials of Criminal Justice. 5th ed. California: Thomson Higher Education, p.220-248. Bruney, D. (2012) Interview on Court Reform. Interviewed by Nelson Sanford [in person] Dominica, 31 August 2012. Byron, D. (2000) The Vision for the Legal Profession and Judiciary in the 21st Century. [address] Mona: Presentation Ceremony for Graduates of the Norman Manley Law School. Dakolias, M. and Said, J. (1999) Judicial Reform: A Process of Change Through Pilot Courts. [report] Washington: World Bank Legal and Judicial Reform Series. Dandurand, Y. et al. (2004) Programming Opportunities in the Justice and Security Sectors in the Caribbean. [report] Vancouver: CIDA. Feeley, M. (1983). Court reform on trial: why simple solutions fail. New York, Basic Books. Hays, S. (1979) The Logic of Court Reform: Is Frederick Taylor Gloating?. Criminal Justice Review, 4 (7), p.7-16. Mays, G. and Taggart, W. (1986) Court Delay: Policy Implications For Court Managers. Criminal Justice Review, 1 (2), p.198-210. Menon, N. (2011) Judicial Delay May Become a Thing of the Past. The Hindu, [online] 26 October. Available at: http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/article2571375.ece?homepage=true [Accessed: 20 Sep 2012]. Merryman, J. et al. (1979) Law and Social Change in Mediterranean Europe and Latin America: A Handbook of Legal and Social Indicators for Comparative Study. California: Stanford Law School. Nij.gov (2012) Specialized Courts | National Institute of Justice. [online] Available at: http://nij.gov/topics/courts/specialized-courts.htm [Accessed: 20 Sep 2012]. Unknown. (2011) Public urged to use out-of-court arbitration. Barbados Today, [online] 21 October. Available at: http://www.barbadostoday.bb/ [Accessed: 20 Sep 2012]. Unknown. (2012) Fed Up. The Sun Newspaper, 30th July, p.24.…

    • 3539 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Canada’s highest court was in Britain, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. It could over-rule decisions made by the Canadian courts.…

    • 1679 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ‘Jamaica Question’, as the debate came to be called, therefore started as a case of coloured colonised people versus White colonisers but turned into a verbal fight among Britons. These religious, social, economic, political and ethical divergences of opinion set up, and were fuelled by, the political context of Britain at the time; they reflected the perceived potential threats on an international scale to Britain's might.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dual Citizenship

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Constitution of Jamaica, the supreme law of the land has been around since December 1966. The Constitution clearly states that citizens who intend to hold a position in parliament should not hold dual citizenship with another country. Persons arguing that the Constitution should be changed to allow these citizens to take part in the running of the country. Careful thought went into the writing of the Constitution. If the Constitution is amended now to allow this change, it will only be opening doors for others to constitute other changes.…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The police, prisons, and court system in the United States are far more advanced compared to the police, prisons, and court system in Jamaica. In the following research paper, it will discuss the comparison of police, police bribery and corruption, police brutality, the prison system, and the court system between these two countries. It will expand more on how bribery and corruption are more prevalent in Jamaica than in the U.S, and how the laws in the United States are more enforced to eradicate bribery and corruption, how the prisons have more resources in the U.S than in Jamaica, and how the U.S court system is much more efficient and effective than the court system in…

    • 117 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jamaica Research Paper

    • 4258 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Jamaica is the third most populous Anglophone country in the Americas after the United States and Canada.…

    • 4258 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The judiciary plays a unique and pervasive role in American society because of its influence in establishing legal precedent, regulating industry, and crafting social policy. The judiciary is the arbitrator of disputes involving nearly every aspect of human experience, and in many cases these disputes cannot or will not be resolved by the executive, the legislative, and the electorate. Unlike the other branches, the judiciary has no choice but to make some type of decision on the presenting issues. Even a decision not to hear a case has significant repercussions on the relevant issues,…

    • 3787 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law - appeal routes

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The end of result of the appeal can consist of the conviction being quashed, vary the conviction to lesser offence or change the sentence, or even order to retrial to be made.…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    What has not changed is the way judgments are made or given; after all, judges have been independent in the way they work for centuries.…

    • 1922 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judicial Independence

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One of the basic principles of the British Constitution is judicial independence . Simply explained, this means that judges, in making their decisions, must not be influenced or coerced by outside forces (History Learning Site). This independence is assured by several safeguards which include fiscal autonomy, independent selection, and security of tenure. The purpose of these is to ensure that judges will render fair and impartial decisions without fear or favor. Judges must be protected from any and all outside influence that could tarnish the possibility of a strict and impartial judicial process. This can not be emphasized enough. The people need a court that they can rely on to solve their legal problems in accordance with the law and the proper procedure.…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays