Preview

Causes of Rev War

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1189 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Causes of Rev War
Historical Context
The year 1763 marked the end of the French and Indian War, the final defeat of the French and their Native American allies in America. For America's English colonists, this was a cause for great celebration and pride in their English identity. Expressions of English patriotism were widespread. But only twelve years later, these same American colonists found themselves locked in a bitter and violent conflict with the mother country that had so recently been the object of their proud respect. To this day, now over two hundred years later, the reasons behind this abrupt transition of England and its American colonies from allies to enemies are debated.

The following documents address the question of whether the American colonists were really justified in waging war against England. Examine each document carefully, and answer the question or questions that follow.

Document 1
This excerpt is from "Considerations ...," a pamphlet written by Thomas Whately, Whately was an advisor to George Grenville, British Chancellor of the Exchequer (1763-1765) and the author of the Stamp Act. In this pamphlet, Whately explained why the British were justified in levying taxes on their American colonists.
We are not yet recovered from a War undertaken solely for their [the Americans'] Protection ... a War undertaken for their defense only ... they should contribute to the Preservation of the Advantages they have received....

1. Why did Whately (and probably most other English officials) feel that the American colonists should be willing to pay higher taxes to Parliament?

Document 2
These excerpts are from Letters from a Farmer in Pennsylvania by John Dickinson. Dickinson was a Pennsylvania political leader who served in the Stamp Act Congress of 1765. Later in his career, he served in the Continental Congress, and later still, in the Constitutional Convention. In the following statement, Dickinson condemned some of the new taxes being imposed by

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Document 2: According to Dickinson, what taxes was Parliament justified in imposing on the colonies?…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Restated Thesis. Taxation without representation was common in the 13 colonies. Colonists often debated about why a small island, Great Britain, should rule a piece of a continent, the 13 colonies, from 3,000 miles away. The Stamp Act was issued by the British Parliament in 1765. The Stamp Act directly taxed printed materials. In Document 2, John Dickinson, a political leader from Pennsylvania, shows his disagreement with the Stamp Act. John Dickinson shares that Great Britain never thought the colonies would thrive as much as they did, so when the British Parliament issued the Stamp Act, and it was just for the purpose of raising Britain’s revenue, he disagreed with it. In addition, all the laws regarding the colonies only talked about regulating trade but it never intended the raising of taxes. John Dickinson, like many other patriots tolerated the old taxes, but at the Stamp Act, they drew the line, because Britain was taking money from the abundant colonies, with no benefits in return. The Townshend Acts followed the Stamp Act in 1767. Similarly, in Document 2, John Dickinson talks about the Townshend Acts having the same purpose as the Stamp Act, bringing more money to Britain. However, this time, when the Townshend Acts were issued, the tax was hid in the price. Charles Townshend hoped the colonists would be glad there were no more taxes even though the taxes would be right in the price. Unfortunately for Great Britain, the colonists realized that Britain was trying to be sneaky and hide the tax, so they got even madder. Moreover, the British never…

    • 528 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This primary source is a letter from George Washington to his wife’s uncle, Francis Dandridge. It is a very interesting piece due to the fact that Dandridge did not approve of his niece’s marriage to Washington; Washington notes that he, nor his wife had received any word from Dandridge in months due to his disapproval of Washington. Furthermore, he decides to use this letter as an opportunity to note some grievances he has over the Stamp Act. He makes a special note about the Stamp Act stating, “The Stamp Act Imposed on the Colonies by the Parliament of Great Britain engrosses the conversation of the Speculative part of the Colonists, who look upon this unconstitutional method of Taxation as a direful attack upon their Liberties, & loudly…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    7. Why did the colonists object to taxation by the British Parliament? Who did they believe had the right to tax them in their colonies?…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As seen in the British Order in Council, Parliament sees the acceptance of these new taxes and laws as a duty and responsibility of the colonies (Doc F). The colonies had had enough with the taxes and when the British decided to pass the Stamp Act of 1765, the colonists were outraged and in turn decided to protest. The colonies develop this idea of “no taxation without representation” in the British Parliament due to the ideas of James Otis, who argued it was against the British constitution. The colonies came together to hold the Stamp Act Congress in New York in 1766 to discuss how they were going to protest the new British tax; to which they decided a boycott of purchasing British goods would be put into place. As seen in Newspaper Masthead in October 1765, the colonist were already trying to find ways to encourage the repeal and resistance against the tax before the Stamp Act Congress (Doc H). The King and Parliament noticed the defiance of the tax, and were upset and confused until Benjamin Franklin goes…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During 1765 the British Parliament imposed stamp tariffs on the American colonies. When George Grenville tightened up the administration of the colonial customs service and revised the rates which was “to make them produce a revenue, he knew that he was only beginning, that the colonies could and should contribute more to the cost of their defense. During the summer of 1763 he had already begun to consider the possibility of a stamp tax”. When introducing the idea to Parliament, “he managed to put the colonies in a position where a Stamp Act would be results of their own failure” this was because they would feel guilty for not supporting their mother country in a time of despair. England intended to raise revenue by tariffs on trade with a…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 4 APush

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why were most Americans content with their role within the British Empire in the 1750s? What evidence of discontent did exist?…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    UNIT ONE ESSAY QUESTIONS

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3. The American Revolution should really be called the "British Revolution" because marked changes in British colonial policy were responsible for final political division than were American actions. Assess the validity of this statement for the period 1763 – 1776…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Stamp Act of 1765, enacted by the British Parliament had a profound effect on the America Revolution as well as later American legal and Constitutional writings. In the opening line, The Stamp Act of 1765 provides "...several Duties were granted, continued, and appropriated, to toward defraying the Expenses of defending, protecting,…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In America there were many reasons that colonists on both sides of the issue of taxation had for whether taxes on the American people were necessary and justified. In the reading about the colonist’s responses to the stamp act of 1765, both sides were represented. The people who were in favor of the stamp act felt that America had created a burden on the British government and that they needed to help lessen that burden on England. They also felt that since the government had protected the colonists from Native Americans that America owed them for maintain peace and their freedom. By continuing with the negative reactions the colonists were giving it would result in the loss of America and in by doing so would allow for other countries to use the opportunity to become stronger and challenge the authority of the English government. While some people were for taxation others were not as willing. They thought that since they were British citizens and they came to the colonies that they deserved the same rights as the people back Britain. Placing a tax on the colonist, they felt, was also in conflict with previous rulings of other decrees like the Manga Charta. They also placed an emphasis on how laws in England may…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Stamo Act

    • 1745 Words
    • 7 Pages

    “No taxation without representation!” This was the cry that came forth from the American rebellion after George Greenville proposed the Stamp Act in England’s House of Commons. George Greenville had a plan to help pay off debt and help pay for soldiers to protect the American frontier. The Stamp Act, Greenville’s plan, was proposed on March 9th 1765 and took effect on March 22nd 1765. The act was to tax printed documents such as ship papers, legal papers, newspapers, licenses, and even playing cards. This act was passed by the British Parliament but wasn’t accepted for long from the Americans. To many it was taken offensively because taxes were originally used for commerce reasons; however, when the Stamp Act came about their money was being used for fundraiser purposes. Was Greenville’s Stamp Act plan a good idea? Although it helped pay off England’s debt and helped pay for England’s protection, it also upset those who were required to pay the extra tax with having no say as to how their money was being used (Colonial Williamsburg).…

    • 1745 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stamp Act

    • 308 Words
    • 1 Page

    During the time of the stamp act, Dulany, Jenyns, Pitt, and Grenville all gave their opinions British taxation. Dulany opposed the right of British parliament to tax the colonies without representation, and voiced his objection to "visual representation." Jenyns supported the right of parliament to tax the people since other English cities were taxed as well and they too were visually represented. Pitt also opposed the internal tax on the colonies since he did not support the idea of visual representation and that in the past, parliament wouldn't tax without a representative. Grenville supported the right since he saw it as the right of parliament to do so.…

    • 308 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Boston Massacre

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In conclusion, the colonists were justified in leaving the British by a war due to the unfair treatment and the actions of the British negatively effecting the American…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Revolutionary War Causes

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The British will leave a permanent army in the colonies to protect them from any Native American threats or attacks. As a result, Prime Minister George Greenville asked Parliament to pass increased taxes on the colonies to pay for the war debt and protection. The colonists felt they were independent now, and the British Parliament needed their consent before taxing the colonists. The colonists spoke out against the taxation without…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Road to Revolution

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The British Empire was one of the strongest and wealthiest Empire in the world during this time period. Britain being the mother country to the American colonies, used nine different parliament (laws) acts from 1763-1775 to control the American colonies. These Acts were cruel and unusual punishments to the American colonies. It was a way the British Empire could flaunt their power to the American colonies and make them feel powerless on another continent. Britain wanted to make sure that they kept the American colonies stuck in a corner, without any way of moving, unless it was when they, the British, said so. This tight control, was very disrespectful and hurtful to the American colonies and it only made the colonies start to resent Britain. The Parliament Acts that were passed from 1763-1775, left the American colonies with two choices to break away from their mother country and become independent or obey the ridiculous Parliament Acts and forever be bullied by the British government. Out of the nine Parliament Acts, I will only discussed four of the Parliament’s Acts to show why the American colonies had no other choice but to say “give me liberty or give me death,” and fight for their independence from Britain.…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays