The Lunch Room Murder Essay
The evidence points to customer C as the murderer because of the way he eats with his left hand and the way he shoots the gun with his left hand. Ernie the building owner said that the shooters right hand was on the wall when he shot the gun. He also said that the shooter shot the man at point blank range.
Other evidence shows that customers B, C, and D knew each other because they all paid together. Customer B’s ticket was a total of 3.00 dollars. Customer C’s ticket was a total of 2.40 dollars. Customer D’s ticket was a total of 3.65 dollars. When added up the total is 8.75 dollars which is what the cash register was just rung up at.
Ernie who is the building owner and only employee was probably mopping so the evidence points to footprints Y as Ernie’s. The evidence points that customer A’s footprints were Z but, for some odd reason when he left the counter he went into the kitchen, also he did not pay his bill. The evidence points to customer C as the footprints of X are his.
After going through the evidence the evidence shows that the murderer is customer C. he was left handed and so was the shooter. The footprints of X came from either customers B, C, or D. The footprints of X go right by were the shooter hand was when he shot the gun. Cask of Amontillado essay
No because he is insane. Montresor tricked Fortunato so he could also be trying to trick the reader. Also he is not reliable because he is a biased narrator and we did get to hear not Fortunato’s side of the story.
Considering that he is the only source that we have, we must suppose he is being unreliable. To justify his actions through his words. Montresor was dedicated to his own point of view, which is cruel, vicious, shrewd, and bitter. Montresor doesn’t mind telling us about his torture and murder of Fortunato he thinks what he did was the right way to handle the situation.
Montresor is reliable because Fortunato deserved it. Montresor says that he...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document