Preview

Case Study Sample

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1299 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case Study Sample
A NEW LOOK AT MATERIALITY

What are the latest views on materiality in financial accounting? How have standards for measuring materiality changed since passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act? And what new approaches are being taken to better assess the materiality of financial information? In the aftermath of the Enron scandal, corporate financial statements are under greater scrutiny than ever, forcing auditors to pay closer attention to many transactions previously considered immaterial. This paper reviews the basis of materiality in financial reporting and the methods commonly used to assess what is – and what is not – material.

The concept of materiality has been receiving increased scrutiny by the Securities and Exchange Commission since at least 1998, when then-chairman Arthur Levitt made his much-quoted “Numbers Game” speech. Levitt complained of the misuse of materiality by companies that deliberately record misleading financial information to increase their earnings statements, and then later claim that any errors introduced were immaterial. Levitt clearly abhorred the practice and went on to say that “in markets where missing an earnings projection can result in a loss of millions of dollars in market capitalization, I have a hard time accepting that some of these so-called non-events simply don’t matter” (Messier, et al, 2005, p. 154). In the year following Levitt’s speech, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 99, which made it clear that quantitative measures alone are insufficient to determine materiality; qualitative measures must be considered, too. For example, if the inclusion of any item or transaction, however small, will cause a firm to miss forecasted earnings estimates, then that item must be properly recorded and reported.

The abuse of materiality standards can be traced back to the mid-1980s, when Wall Street intensified its focus on quarterly earnings and practically demanded continual increases in



References: Cox, S. P., Guan, L., & Wendell, J. (2005, August). Biased Rounding in the Reported Earnings of Financial Firms. Bank Accounting & Finance, 18, 29-32. Gist, W. E., Shastri, T., & Colson, R. H. (2003, November). Revisiting Materiality. CPA Journal, 73, 60-63. Holder, W. W., Schermann, K. R., & Whittington, R. (2003, November). Materiality Considerations. Journal of Accountancy, 196, 61-66. Messier, W. F., Martinov-Bennie, N., & Eilifsen, A. (2005, November). A Review and Integration of Empirical Research on Materiality: Two Decades Later. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 24, 153-187. Rosner, R. L., Comunale, C. L., & Sexton, T. R. (2006, June). Assessing Materiality. CPA Journal, 76, 26-28. Scherpenseel, C. (2004, October). The Ever-Changing Landscape of Corporate Governance. Strategic Finance, 86, 49-51. Vorhies, J. B. (2005, May). The New Importance of Materiality. Journal of Accountancy, 199, 53-59.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Anne Aylor Case - 1

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Different materiality bases are considered when determining planning materiality because the magnitude and nature of financial statement misstatements or omissions have different influences on different financial statement users. For example, investors are more interested in the accuracy of numbers involving net income because they are mainly concerned with the company’s ability to increase shareholder wealth. For an audit company, the primary concern when planning materiality is to take into account all expected financial statement users. These different expected users all have different concerns in regards to where financial statements contain misstatements. Debtors such as banks who provide loans to help companies like Anne Aylor raise capital are mainly concerned with company’s maintaining debt covenants involving current assets. Anne Aylor has a debt covenant to maintain a current ratio over 2.0, which according to the company’s projected 2012 balance sheet, will not be met. These debtors are more concerned with Anne Aylor overstating assets or understating liabilities in order to meet these debt covenants and avoid potential interest rate changes.…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the release of the SFAC No. 8, your definition of materiality has been brought into question. In the past, your rule for determining materiality was based solely on quantitative data, where an event was only material if its impact was more than a given percentage of the income statement amounts. Using a quantitative measure is effective because it keeps the process objective; however there are also times when the quantitative difference doesn’t adequately demonstrate the true effect of an action. For this reason, “materiality is an entity-specific aspect of relevance based on the nature [quality] or magnitude [quantity] or both items,” as stated in Q:11 of the SFAC No. 8. For The Framework Company each of the following closing entries must be judged on a case-by-case level on the parameters of whether it could influence decisions that our users make.…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    B120 TMA03

    • 1098 Words
    • 4 Pages

    References: Day, J, Eller, L, Preston, D, Watson, G (2011), An introduction to accounting and finance in business, Milton Keynes, The Open University.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The objective of the audit of financial statements is to enable the auditor to express an opinion if the financial statements are prepared in accordance with an identified financial reporting framework. The reason that materiality is allocated to those accounts sampled because materiality represents the magnitude of an omission or misstatement of an item in a financial report. The three function of the audit risk are inherent risk (IR), control risk (CR), and detection risk (DR). Every level of audit risk has an opposite connection that exists between assessed levels of controls, inherent risk, and level of detection risk…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    individual report

    • 1699 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Bibliography: Drever, M., Stanton, P., & Mcgowan, S. (2007). Contemprorary issues in accounting. Sydney: John Wiley &Sons Australia.…

    • 1699 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Discussion

    • 2337 Words
    • 10 Pages

    "Hocus-Pocus Accounting" by Douglas R. Carmichael, Journal of Accountancy, October 1999; Vol. 188, Iss. 4; pg. 59, 5 pgs…

    • 2337 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Acct 3563 Summary

    • 7433 Words
    • 30 Pages

    Page 3 Page 7 Page 12 Page 17 Page 20 Positive Accounting Theory Ethics in Accounting Accounting for Physical Assets & Intangible Assets Accounting for Assets in Mining & Agricultural Industries ounting Accounting for Provisions…

    • 7433 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Accounting and Global Piracy

    • 3664 Words
    • 15 Pages

    References: Bazley, M., Hancock, P., Berry, A. and Jarvis R., (2004) Contemporary Accounting, 5 Edition, Nelson ITP, South Melbourne…

    • 3664 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anne Aylor Case

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Materiality is a relative rather than an absolute concept. The materiality threshold that will influence users of the financial statements will vary depending on the context in which the entity operates. For example, the magnitude of a misstatement that will influence financial statement users will vary depending on how the entity is performing relative to the industry. Misstatements of a smaller magnitude will be more influential for an entity just achieving the industry average compared to an entity significantly over- or under-achieving relative to the industry average.…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    5. Healy, P. M. and Wahlen, J. M. (1999) “A Review of the Earnings Management Literature and Its Implications for Standard Setting”, Accounting Horizons, Volume 13, p365-383.…

    • 2057 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 2, “Qualitative Characteristics of Accounting Information,” defines materiality as follows:…

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    When reviewing the information gathered in “The Dangerous Morality of Managing Earnings,” there are five generalizations in how to manage short term earnings. They are how managers manipulate records to benefit themselves or the company. It seems that there is no true uniformity in short term earnings and each felt that rules could be bent by manipulating operating procedures, accounting methods, deferring expenditures, budget target, or by changing the short term earnings in sales and expense was justifiable.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eyemax

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Total financial statement materiality was set at $625,000, which is equal to approximately 5% of earnings before taxes, and the level of potential aggregate misstatement including upper bounds suggests a significant adjustment would be required to reduce audit risk to an acceptable level. In the planning phase of the audit, both inherent risk and control risk were assessed at less than the maximum but the audit plan specifies an audit approach that relies primarily on substantive testing.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It would be feasible for auditors to conceal this information from their audit clients. In the North Face case, Crawford, The North Face’s CFO, knew the materiality threshold that Deloitte had established for them, and also knew that the gross profit of approximately $800,000 on the $1.64million fell slightly below Deloitte’s materiality threshold for North Face’s collective gross profit. He believed that company would pass on that proposed adjustment. If CFO of North Face didn’t know the threshold, it would be another story. Anyway, general acceptable accounting principle and other accounting standards have set up rules for companies to follow how to record its transactions, such as revenues recognition, match principle, and full-disclosure principle. The financial statements provided by companies should be free of material errors. Financial reporting information should have qualitative characteristics, which are relevance, faithful representation, verifiability, timeliness, and understandability. The function of the financial statement is to let company’s…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bibliography: Atrill, P., & McLaney, E. (2011). Financial Accounting for Decision makers (6th ed.). FT Prentice Hall. Elliott, B., & Elliott, J. (n.d.). Financial Accounting and Reporting (14th ed.). FT Prentice Hall. HSBC Corporation. (2011). Hong Kong Bank Foundation. Retrieved 2011, from Hong Kong Bank Foundation: http://www.30.hongkongbankfoundation.org/index.php/en/events HSBC Holdings plc. (2011). HSBC Holdings plc. Annual Report and Accounts 2010. London: Group Finance HSBC Holdings plc. IASB. (2011, February). Financial Statement Presentation. Retrieved August 2011, from IASB: http://www.iasb.co.uk/ Kocieniewski, D. (2011, March 24). GE Strategies Let It Avoid Taxes Altogether. Retrieved March 2011, from The New York Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/25/business/economy/25tax.html?_r=1&ref =business Sarbanes-Oxley Act Forum. (n.d.). sarbanes-oxley forum. Retrieved August 28, 2011, from sarbanes-oxley forum: http://www.sarbanes-oxleyforum.com/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=1 Weinstein, E. A. (2007, August). Materiality: Whose Business Is It? Retrieved August 2011, from CPA Journal: http://www.nysscpa.org/printversions/cpaj/2007/807/p24.htm…

    • 2423 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays