Case Study in Abnormal Behavior
April 4, 2011
Dr. Melda Jones
CERTIFICATE OF ORIGINALITY: I certify that the attached paper, which was produced for the class identified above, is my original work and has not previously been submitted by me or by anyone else for any class. I further declare that I have cited all sources from which I used language, ideas and information, whether quoted verbatim or paraphrased, and that any and all assistance of any kind, which I received while producing this paper, has been acknowledged in the References section. This paper includes no trademarked material, logos, or images from the Internet, which I do not have written permission to include. I further agree that my name typed on the line below is intended to have, and shall have the same validity as my handwritten signature.
Student's signature (name typed here is equivalent to a signature): ____Valvita___Isaac____________________ ___
Case Study in Abnormal Behavior
Psychological is very important in making criminal decisions. Criminal responsibility depends on the related disciplines that are found in the field of psychology. Abnormality differs depending upon what is considered to be typical within a culture. What is typical lies on the surface of cultural morality. Culture is considered to be group – specific behavior obtained from social influences (Hansell & Damour, 2008). To have a better understanding, and come to some conclusiveness of why certain things happen, you must first have an understanding of an individual’s personality. Personality is considered to be the different mask that people wear. These masks are projected and displayed within an individual’s response. Personality is impacted in emotions, and shown through behavior. Cognition is linked to an individual’s learning that is displayed through abilities, processes, and changes that an individual endures. The biological development of an individual involves genetic make –up, that also influences some instances in behavior. There are psychological practices that are used in determining the outcome of some legal issues. Selected Case Study / “Jeffrey Dahmer” When deciding upon the criminal responsibility of an individual, there must be a determination on whether or not the individual is Malingering or actually possess a factitious disorder. Malingering is the act of appearing mentally ill so that the responsibility or compensation is exempt of that individual that is to be held responsible (Hansell & Damour, 2008). A factitious disorder is when an individual shows psychological symptoms of being mentally ill, that will exempt them from legal responsibility of normality, and the individual receives medical attention. In order to determine criminal responsibility an individual must show that they understand what they did, and they must also know that what they did is wrong. If the individual is delusive and/or does not understand what they did, or that (the wrong doing) was wrong, the guilty person will be excused of normal proceedings in a criminal case. The case I chose to study is that of Jeffrey Dahmer. Jeffrey Dahmer, a serial killer, and a sex offender. Dahmer murdered seventeen males between the years of 1978 to 1991. His murders included torture, dismemberment, necrophilia, and even cannibalism (Creekmore, 2007). Torture is to inflict pain for punishment. Dismemberment is cutting off bodily limbs. Necrophilia is receiving sexual arousal from a dead body, and cannibalism is the act of humans eating another human’s flesh. Jeffrey Dahmer was a very disturbed man. His victims were men and boys. He would choose the majority of his victims from gay bars. He would have sex with the victims, and then kill them. Dahmer was a registered/convicted child molester. He would lure children with alcohol, and drugs, then rap them while they are under the influence of a delusive...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document