Preview

Case History of Hadley vs. Baxendale: Measuring and Compensating Loss

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1012 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case History of Hadley vs. Baxendale: Measuring and Compensating Loss
eMeasuring and Compensating Loss
Note: Hadley v. Baxendale is one of the most famous cases in history.
Case:
Hadley v. Baxendale (1854, ENG) [pp. 206-210]
Parties:
Plaintiff - Hadley
Defendant - Baxendale
Facts:
The plaintiff, Hadley, operated a mill. The crankshaft of the mill broke, forcing the mill to shut down. Hadley contracted with the defendant, Baxendale, to deliver the crankshaft to engineers for repair by a certain date. Baxendale failed to deliver on the date in question, causing Hadley to lose some business. Hadley sued for the profits he lost due to Baxendale 's late delivery, and the jury awarded Hadley damages of £25. Baxendale appealed, contending that he did not know that Hadley would suffer any particular damage by reason of the late delivery.
Issue:
Whether a defendant in a breach of contract case could be held liable for damages that the defendant was not aware would be incurred from a breach of the contract. Reasoning: The court said no to allowing Hadley to recover lost profits in this case, holding that Baxendale could only be held liable for losses that were generally foreseeable, or if Hadley had mentioned his special circumstances in advance. The mere fact that a party is sending something to be repaired does not indicate that they would lose profits if it was not delivered on time. The court suggested various other circumstances under which Hadley could have entered into this contract which would not have presented such dire circumstances, and noted that where special circumstances do exist, provisions can be made in the contract voluntarily entered into by the parties to impose extra damages for a breach.
In this case, however, the court stated: "the loss of profits here cannot reasonably be considered such a consequence of the breach of contract as could have been fairly and reasonably contemplated by both the parties when they made this contract."
The rule of the case stands for placing the risk

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ptarmigan Investment

    • 320 Words
    • 1 Page

    The case that was present in 16.5 is that a breach of contract by Ptarmigan Investment Company who had contracted Gunderson’s, Inc. to construct a golf course for them. After just a third of the work had been completed, Ptarmigan Investment Company ran out of funds to cater for the rest of the project. Therefore, they would not be in a position to pay for the remaining two thirds of the work. Gunderson’s, Inc. has sued the company in a bid to recover the lost profits which if granted would be given to them as damages. The question presented is whether Gunderson’s, Inc. can recover the lost profits as damages. It is evident that the investment company has gone against its agreement with the contractor. Ptarmigan Investment Company has rendered inferior performance of its obligations under the contract. In an unprecedented turn of events, they are unable to pay the contractor for their services. Although the work was yet to be completed, the contractor had anticipated a certain amount of profit. Therefore, they are justified under the law to claim compensation from the breaching party. Gunderson, Inc. can receive damages in form of monetary compensation. This is one of the methods used to remedy contract breaches. Compensatory damages are awarded in the event that a breach of contract has led to a loss of a bargain. In so doing it places the non-breaching party in the same position it would have been had the contract been fully performed with regard to the benefits accrued. In this case, payment to the contractor was estimated at $1,294,129 and payment had already been made for a third of the work. The sum of money owed to restore the bargain made is $ 867,066, which would ensure that the contractor has earned their full profits. Gunderson’s, Inc. can recover lost profits as damages because the contract was breached before completion of the construction…

    • 320 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Procedure: The jury first found for Mr. Faverty. Then Faverty filed suit against McDonald’s, and McDonald’s appealed.…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    You Decide, Week 5

    • 777 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Jimmy’s mother, John, and Jimmy’s Poor-Man’s Bar sued Software Inc. for the damage caused by Coleman. Coleman sued Software Inc. for wrongful termination and the jewelry store sued Software Inc. for the value of the ring.…

    • 777 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    costa rica

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages

    lawsuit from his stock market days. The incident frightened both of the Benders and a home…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Citation- Legal Brief

    • 1352 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Facts: The appellant, Michael P. Babine brought suit against Gilley’s Bronco Shop, Inc. damages from injuries sustained at Kevin’s West, Inc. a nightclub, where he was thrown off the mechanical bull “El Toro”. The mechanical bull was sold to Kevin’s from Gilley’s. Gilley’s purchased it from another party. The purpose of the mechanical bull was for training rodeo cowboys.…

    • 1352 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    If a breach is considered material, the breach recipient can cancel the contract and sue for damages. However, there must actually be damages before such relief can be granted. Damages in a contract case are generally determined by examining a party’s expectation interest. That is, the breach recipient is entitled to damages measured by how much in money damages would be required to put the party in the same position as if the contract had been properly performed. Homer has no damages unless the costs and expenses to complete the cabin will exceed the original contract price ($200,000) Homer expected to pay.…

    • 955 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the key issues in this case is what are considered deliverables in the arrangement made between…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal Case Study

    • 2752 Words
    • 12 Pages

    there is a risk that the plaintiff will suffer financial loss if the statement is incorrect.…

    • 2752 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Negligence and Points

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages

    5. According to the case, why didn't the court approve summary judgment for product liability claims? (5 points)…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Goody’s entered into a contract with Banco to purchase wind suits. On or about July 13, 1994, Goody’s agreed to change the delivery date of the first shipment to September 30, 1994 and assured Banco that the “letters of credit” would be amended appropriately. Around August 23, 1994, prior to the contract delivery date, Goody’s informed Banco that they were terminating the contract. Plaintiff comes to the courts for relieve in the matter to a breach of contract.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Echo Consulting Services sued North Conway bank for partial actual eviction. In addition Echo Consulting Services sued for breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment as well as for the breach of the lease. These were all ruled against from the Superior Court. Echo Consulting Services argues that the trial court erred by confusing the legal standards for constructive eviction and partial actual eviction and partial actual eviction, finding that locking the street-level access doors did not constitute a partial actual eviction, ruling that there was no constructive eviction and applying the wrong legal standard to determine the quiet enjoyment…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Blaustein V. Burto Brief

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Issue: Was there a contract, and if there was, did the defendants breached that contract and confidential relationship, and unjustly received enrichment from such breach?…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    DECISION: The court should not grant Kallestad’s request for dismissal because he breached his contract with the Rothings and failed to honor the implied warranty of merchantability. In addition, Kallestad should be ordered to reimburse or compensate the Rothings for the goods and products they’ve lost due to the defective product they received from Arnold Kallestad’s ranch.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In article “You Asked for it, You got it…Toy Yoda: Practical Jokes, Prizes and Contract Law” by Keith A. Rowley, the professor of the University of Nevada, is discussing a case of Berry v Gulf Coast Wings Inc.…

    • 1593 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Held. The trial court erred in granting defendant judgment on the pleadings because the plaintiff’s complaint states a cause of action for breach of an express contract, and can be amended to state a cause of action independent of allegations of express contract.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays