Preview

Case Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
698 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case Essay
Case Essay

By
Florida State University
September 9. 2014
History of Torts

The Anglo- American tort goes back to the action for trespass to property or to that person. The late 18th century was when this first was observed the distinction between that which is unintentional and injuries that are willfully inflicted. Negligence was distingue as a different tort. The basic idea is today is that a breach of duty constitutes a tort. In American there are courts that treat unjustified and willful as tortious, but other courts have stated that the act must be tortios by law. Torts that hurts someone feelings or reputation are considered to be personal torts. Torts that involve personal property, real are property torts. There are many different classes of property torts such as negligence and automobile accidents.
There have been cases that tort liability can be given without finding a fault, just like no fault auto insurance. In some cases finding fault can be very crucial because of punitive, compensatory damages. Torts can be very costly and time consuming. There have been many attempts to reform tort law, so that there will be a cap on no fault statues and settlements. During the 1990’S there have been some states that passed laws that would limit the amount of damages. State courts have stopped these limits because they believe that this violates the “open courts” which is guaranteed in our state constitutions.
Torts are created by states through Judges and by Statutory law. In most state the Judges and states use the Restatement of Torts 2nd as a guide. This publication is prepared by the American Law Institute. Their primary goal is to show an effective statement of the general law of the United States of America. There are many different torts and this includes assault, trespass, battery, negligence, products liability and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Torts

generally fall into three different categories, negligent torts,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Gng4170 Lecture Notes

    • 4235 Words
    • 17 Pages

    o Defamation – An intentional tort. The reputation of the victim is damaged publicly by untrue statements made by the tort-feezer.…

    • 4235 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jacobsen vs Nike

    • 1484 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Tort Law - Law of Negligence: It involves inadvertent or unintentionally careless conduct causing injury or damage to another person or his property. Four required elements or ingredients must be established by the plaintiff to succeed in a negligence action. Failure to establish any one of these four will lead to dismissal of the plaintiff’s action.1…

    • 1484 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bugusa Case Summary

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The tort of negligence applies in this scenario. Negligence is described as a party who fails to act reasonably, even when the act is not intentionally, or it does not intend for harm to occur (Melvin, 2011).…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Michael Blair was faced with multiple charges and years in prison for something he did not do. First Blair would be faced with a really long time in prison for capital murder. Wednesday, Blair was charged with capital murder because of the death of Ashley Nicole Estell, who was abducted on Sept. 4 from a crowded park in Plano, Texas (McFarland). This shows what Michael was charged with capital murder against a Texas teen, Ashley Estell, on September 4th from a crowded park. Second, Blair was already a convicted felon and claimed that he was innocent. A convicted sex offender that was 23 years old was charged with capital murder, says that he did not commit the abduction and killing of a Texas girl (McFarland). This goes more into personal detail about the convicted murderer, Michael Blair, and the fact that he is pleading innocent in this capital murder charge. Michael Blair knew that he was not guilty of capital murder against Ashley Estell, but he would have a long fight ahead of him to get exonerated. The investigation would make him seem more guilty, than innocent.…

    • 1741 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jones V. Tsige Case Study

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The tort system provides compensation to individuals who have been wronged or injured by the activity of another individual. Until the Ontario Court of Appeal decision in Jones v. Tsige in 2012, resulting in the creation of the tort of intrusion upon seclusion, the common law did not include torts that did not entail a personal or financial injury. It is essential the common law includes torts that do not entail actual injury to provide individuals the means of seeking remedies when they are wronged from the wrongdoer responsible for the action.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    LA 245 Study Guide

    • 6344 Words
    • 24 Pages

    Torts: a violation of a duty imposed by the civil law. When someone breaks one of those duties and injures another, it is tort…

    • 6344 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Business

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages

    References: Okrent, Kathy J. (2009). Tort and Personal Injury Law. Fourth Edition: Cengage Learning Inc.…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tort Outline

    • 9959 Words
    • 40 Pages

    1) Introduction a) Definition – A tort is a civil wrong, other than breach of contract, for which the law provides a remedy. A person who breaches a tort duty (i.e., a duty to act in a manner that will not injure another person) has committed a tort and may be liable in a lawsuit brought by a person injured because of that tort. Torts is a fault-based system. b) Purposes of tort law: (1) to provide a peaceful means for adjusting the rights of parties who might otherwise “take the law into their own hands”; (2) to deter wrongful action; (3) to encourage socially responsible behavior; and, (4) to restore injured parties to their original condition, insofar as the law can do this, by compensating them for their injury. 2) Intentional Torts a) Assault, battery, false imprisonment, trespass to chattels, and trespass to land. b) Intent i) Meaning of intent: There is no general meaning of “intent” when discussing intentional torts. For each individual tort, you have to memorize a different definition of “intent.” All that the intentional torts have in common is that D must have intended to bring about some sort of physical or mental effect upon another person. (1) No intent to harm: The intentional torts are generally not defined in such a way as to require D to have intended to harm the plaintiff. (Example: D points a water gun at P, making it seem like a robbery, when in fact it is a practical joke. If D has intended to put P in fear of imminent harmful bodily contact, the intent for assault…

    • 9959 Words
    • 40 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Intentional Torts

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Buckley, W.R. & Okrent, C. J Torts and personal injury law 3rd ed. Ch.6 & 7 (2004).…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unit 1 Tort Law

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Tort laws are laws that offer remedies to individuals harmed by the unreasonable actions of others. Tort claims usually involve state law and are based on the legal premise that individuals are liable for the consequences of their conduct if it results in injury to others.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tort Reform in the Us

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Tort law is a type of law that is designed to offer remedies to civil wrongs. Unlike contractual damages that occur, where responsibility is predetermined, tort law is designed for someone who is legally injured to be able to recover damages from the person who is deemed legally responsible, or liable for such injuries. Tort law is broken down into three main categories, negligence, strict liability, and intentional tort. In negligence tort one is accused of causing damages through their carelessness. After accusation of negligence the plaintiff must be able to show that the defendant had duty of care, and that a breach of duty had occurred that caused the damages. Strict liability is a legal doctrine that makes someone responsible for damages caused by their actions (e.g. product liability). Intentional tort is much like negligence, but instead of one causing damages by accident, there was reckless action or intent to cause the damages that occurred (e.g. assault, battery). Tort cases are based on common law, which is laws that have been developed through court decisions, i.e. precedent. However, in certain cases tort law can also be based on statutory law laid out by the legislature. It is up to the court to decide which rule should take a higher standing depending on the case.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hot Coffee

    • 1875 Words
    • 8 Pages

    A tort is a non-criminal civil wrong that is caused either on purpose or through negligence (Simon, Eddins…

    • 1875 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Introduction to Law

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A movie star sued a tabloid newspaper for statements it made regarding her abuse of drugs. The story was not true, having been invented by the editors to sell newspapers. Assume the movie star lost several employment opportunities because of the story and she decided to sue.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tort Reform

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the United States justice system, a tort is best defined as an injury or loss that was committed deliberately or negligently by a single person or an entity (Crane). The history of tort law can be traced back to the initial trespass of property or person, but it was not until the 18th century that the distinction between intentional and unintentional acts was made (Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia). In recent years, tort law has become the center of scrutiny through the increase in tort costs, insurance liability costs, and the number of frivolous lawsuits made. This scrutiny has lead to the creation of tort reform. Tort reform is a movement to reshape the way consumers can access the courts by restricting their right to sue and limiting the award that could be received (Crane). The upbringing of this reform has also brought to the table two clear and divided groups and their opinions of tort reform; the advocates of tort reform and the opposition.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Torts Breakdown of Elements

    • 3166 Words
    • 13 Pages

    1. Intentional torts are actions with the purpose or intention to injure another person or that person’s property. The person inflicting the harm is called a tortfeasor. Intentional torts require intent. The person who committed the tort must have intended to cause harm. The harm, however, does not require malice or ill will, just the knowledge that certain consequences would result from their acts. Most often, the consequences result in some type of harm. Intentional torts involve intentional acts, and carry a high degree of risk if injury, and usually a low degree of social benefit. The risk generally outweighs the benefit received; therefore, the duty not to intentionally injure someone or something is great.…

    • 3166 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics